Literature DB >> 18656915

Covalency in the f element-chalcogen bond. computational studies of M[N(EPR2)2]3 (M = La, Ce, Pr, Pm, Eu, U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm; E = O, S, Se, Te; R = H, (i)Pr, Ph).

Kieran I M Ingram1, Matthew J Tassell, Andrew J Gaunt, Nikolas Kaltsoyannis.   

Abstract

The geometric and electronic structures of the title complexes have been studied using scalar relativistic, gradient-corrected density functional theory. Extension of our previous work on six-coordinate M[N(EPH 2) 2] 3 (M = La, Ce, U, Pu; E = O, S, Se, Te), models for the experimentally characterized M[N(EP (i)Pr 2) 2] 3, yields converged geometries for all of the other 4f and 5f metals studied and for all four group 16 elements. By contrast, converged geometries for nine-coordinate M[N(EPPh 2) 2] 3 are obtained only for E = S and Se. Comparison of the electronic structures of six- and nine-coordinate M[N(EPH 2) 2] 3 suggests that coordination of the N atoms produces only minor changes in the metal-chalcogen interactions. Six-coordinate Eu[N(EPH 2) 2] 3 and Am[N(EPH 2) 2] 3 with the heavier group 16 donors display geometric and electronic properties rather different from those of the other members of the 4f and 5f series, in particular, longer than expected Eu-E and Am-E bond lengths, smaller reductions in charge difference between M and E down group 16, and larger f populations. The latter are interpreted not as evidence of f-based metal-ligand covalency but rather as being indicative of ionic metal centers closer to M (II) than M (III). The Cm complexes are found to be very ionic, with very metal-localized f orbitals and Cm (III) centers. The implications of the results for the separation of the minor actinides from nuclear wastes are discussed, as is the validity of using La (III)/U (III) comparisons as models for minor actinide/Eu systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18656915     DOI: 10.1021/ic800835k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  7 in total

1.  Triamidoamine uranium(IV)-arsenic complexes containing one-, two- and threefold U-As bonding interactions.

Authors:  Benedict M Gardner; Gábor Balázs; Manfred Scheer; Floriana Tuna; Eric J L McInnes; Jonathan McMaster; William Lewis; Alexander J Blake; Stephen T Liddle
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 24.427

2.  Covalency between the uranyl ion and dithiophosphinate by sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy and density functional theory.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhang; Wuhua Duan; Qiang Wang; Lei Zheng; Jianchen Wang; Jing Chen; Taoxiang Sun
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.616

3.  Defect induced electronic structure of uranofullerene.

Authors:  Xing Dai; Cheng Cheng; Wei Zhang; Minsi Xin; Ping Huai; Ruiqin Zhang; Zhigang Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Triamidoamine thorium-arsenic complexes with parent arsenide, arsinidiide and arsenido structural motifs.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Wildman; Gábor Balázs; Ashley J Wooles; Manfred Scheer; Stephen T Liddle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Reactivity of uranium(iii) with H2E (E = S, Se, Te): synthesis of a series of mononuclear and dinuclear uranium(iv) hydrochalcogenido complexes.

Authors:  Sebastian M Franke; Michael W Rosenzweig; Frank W Heinemann; Karsten Meyer
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Charge densities in actinide compounds: strategies for data reduction and model building.

Authors:  Christopher G Gianopoulos; Vladimir V Zhurov; A Alan Pinkerton
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.769

7.  Thorium-ligand multiple bonds via reductive deprotection of a trityl group.

Authors:  Danil E Smiles; Guang Wu; Nikolas Kaltsoyannis; Trevor W Hayton
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.825

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.