| Literature DB >> 34983662 |
Fidèle K Bassa1, Ikenna C Eze2,3, Rufin K Assaré4,2,3,5, Clémence Essé5,6, Siaka Koné2,3,5, Félix Acka7, Véronique Laubhouet-Koffi8, Dinard Kouassi7, Bassirou Bonfoh5, Jürg Utzinger2,3, Eliézer K N'Goran4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis remains an important public health problem, also among adults, and infected individuals not treated serve as a reservoir for continued transmission. Despite this fact, evidence on the epidemiology of schistosomiasis in adults in Côte d'Ivoire is scanty. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Schistosoma infection and co-infection with other helminth species and Plasmodium among adults in the Taabo region in the south-central part of Côte d'Ivoire.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Côte d’Ivoire; Morbidity patterns; Prevalence; Risk factor; Schistosoma infection
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34983662 PMCID: PMC8728899 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-021-00925-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Summary of participants’ characteristics of a cross-sectional survey carried out in the region of Taabo, south-central part of Côte d’Ivoire in April and May 2017
| Group | Characteristic | Number (%) |
|---|---|---|
| All | 901 (100.0) | |
| Sociodemographic factors | Age [years; median (IQR)] | 41 (18) |
| Age: 18–41 years | 477 (52.9) | |
| Females | 436 (48.4) | |
| No formal education | 405 (45.0) | |
| Lowest wealth tertile | 309 (34.3) | |
| Farmers | 487 (54.1) | |
| Area: Taabo-Cité (semi-urban) | 451 (50.1) | |
| Area: Amani-Ménou (rural) | 222 (24.6) | |
| Area: Tokohiri (rural) | 228 (25.3) | |
| Rural area | 450 (49.9) | |
| Hygiene-related factors | No toilet in household | 426 (47.3) |
| Use of surface water | 201 (22.3) | |
| Disposal of waste in the environment | 799 (88.7) | |
| Disposal of toilet water in the open | 645 (71.6) | |
| Poor handwashing practice | 6 (0.7) | |
| Poor water storage | 115 (12.8) | |
| Poor faecal handling | 446 (49.5) | |
| Poor hygiene score [median (IQR)]a | 3 (2) | |
| Poor hygiene score > 3 | 371 (41.2) | |
| Health-related factors | Fatigue | 701 (77.8) |
| Nausea or vomiting | 154 (17.1) | |
| Fever | 374 (41.5) | |
| Diarrhea | 362 (40.2) | |
| Blood in the stool | 169 (18.8) | |
| Blood in the urine | 6 (0.7) | |
| General body pain | 736 (81.7) | |
| General body pain disturbance | 450 (61.1) | |
| Abdominal pain | 346 (38.4) | |
| Use of pain medication | 238 (26.4) | |
| Pain score [median (IQR)]b | 2 (2) | |
| Pain score > 2 | 329 (36.5) | |
| Symptom score [median (IQR)]c | 4 (3) | |
| Symptom score > 4 | 369 (41.0) | |
| Poor self-rated general health | 43 (4.8) | |
| Use of conventional healthcare | 697 (77.4) | |
| Hemoglobin, Hb [g/dl; median (IQR)] | 13.3 (2.2) | |
| Anaemia | 185 (20.5) | |
| Body mass index, BMI [kg/m2; median (IQR)] | 22.7 (4.8) | |
| Underweight | 69 (7.7) |
All estimates are counts and proportion unless stated otherwise; IQR interquartile range
aCombines no toilet in household, use of surface water, disposal of household waste in nature or toilet water in the open and poor handwashing, fecal handling or water storage practices
bCombines general body pain, pain disturbance, abdominal pain and use of pain medication
cCombines pain score, fatigue, fever, nausea or vomiting, diarrhoea, blood in the stool and blood in the urine
Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni infection according to the sociodemographic factors
| Sociodemographic variables | Examined | Prevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 901 | 23.2 | – |
| Age ≤ 41 years | 477 | 30.0 | |
| Age > 41 years | 424 | 15.6 | 3.10–7 |
| Females | 436 | 21.6 | |
| Males | 465 | 24.7 | 0.25 |
| No formal education | 405 | 23.9 | |
| Formal education | 496 | 22.6 | 0.62 |
| Upper wealth tertiles | 592 | 19.3 | |
| Lowest wealth tertile | 309 | 30.7 | 10–4 |
| Non-farmers | 414 | 20.3 | |
| Farmers | 487 | 25.7 | 0.05 |
| Area: Taabo-Cité | 451 | 21.7 | |
| Area: Amani-Ménou | 222 | 19.8a | |
| Area: Tokohiri | 228 | 29.4b | 0.04 |
| Rural area | 450 | 24.7 |
*P-value: Probability value; Difference in infection prevalence between subgroups of the study sample was tested using the Pearson’s χ2; Difference between a and b is statistically significant (P-value < 0.05)
Bivariate associations between Schistosoma mansoni infection status and sociodemographic and hygiene related factors according to the diagnostic method
| Variables | Model 1 c | Model 2 c | Model 3 c | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No infection | No infection | No infection | |||||||
| 596 (74.0) | 170 (21.1) | 39 (4.9) | 596 (85.8) | 78 (11.2) | 21 (3.0) | 596 (95.2) | 22 (3.5) | 8 (1.3) | |
| Age > 41 | Ref | 0.40 (0.28–0.60)*** | 0.39 (0.19–0.78)** | Ref | 0.28 (0.16–0.48)*** | 0.63 (0.25–1.59) | Ref | 0.19 (0.06–0.58)** | 0.52 (0.12–2.20) |
| Males | Ref | 1.12 (0.79–1.57) | 1.77 (0.90–3.48)* | Ref | 1.16 (0.72–1.86) | 1.70 (0.66–4.39) | Ref | 1.74 (0.72–4.21) | 1.66 (0.39–6.99) |
| Formal education | Ref | 0.98 (0.70–1.38) | 0.60 (0.31–1.15) | Ref | 1.31 (0.80–2.13) | 0.36 (0.13–0.95)** | Ref | 0.93 (0.39–2.18) | 2.32 (0.46–11.61) |
| Lowest wealth tertile | Ref | 1.89 (1.33–2.69)*** | 3.69 (1.90–7.17)*** | Ref | 1.88 (1.16–3.06)** | 7.19 (2.54–20.30)*** | Ref | 3.08 (1.31–7.28)** | 4.28 (1.01–18.14)** |
| Farmers | Ref | 1.28 (0.91–1.80) | 2.86 (1.37–5.98)** | Ref | 1.21 (0.75–1.95) | 5.26 (1.52–18.26)** | Ref | 2.11 (0.85–5.26) | 1.64 (0.39–6.95) |
| Semi-urban area | Ref | 0.89 (0.63–1.25) | 0.51 (0.26–1.00)** | Ref | 0.86 (0.54–1.39) | 0.33 (0.12–0.91)** | Ref | 0.34 (0.13–0.89)** | 0.30 (0.06–1.52) |
| Poor hygiene score > 3 | Ref | 1.52 (1.07–2.14)** | 4.44 (2.17–9.11)** | Ref | 1.42 (0.88–2.29) | 9.31 (2.68–32.36)** | Ref | 1.75 (0.74–4.10) | 5.24 (1.05–26.22)** |
Estimates represent increase or decrease in odds of S. mansoni only infection or S. mansoni co-infection compared to no infection. All estimates were derived from bivariate multinomial logistic regression models including each independent variable at a time. Poor hygiene score combines lack of household toilet, use of surface water, disposal of household waste or toilet water in nature or open and poor handwashing, faecal handling or water storage practices. Median (IQR) of poor hygiene score is 3 (2)
IQR interquartile range, cOR crude odds ratio, CI confidence intervals, Ref. reference
‡S. mansoni co-infection with either Plasmodium, S. haematobium or hookworm
*P-value between 0.05 and 0.1; **P-value < 0.05; ***P-value < 0.001
Model 1: All participants (n = 805); S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz or point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA);
Model 2: n = 695; S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz or POC-CCA test (excluding trace positive-only cases);
Model 3: n = 626; S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz test (excluding all POC-CCA positive-only cases)
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with Schistosoma mansoni infection status according to the diagnostic method
| Sociodemographic variables | Model 1 a | Model 2 aOR (95% | Model 3 a | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No infection | No infection | No infection | |||||||
| N (%) | 596 (74.0) | 170 (21.1) | 39 (4.9) | 596 (85.8) | 78 (11.2) | 21 (3.0) | 596 (95.2) | 22 (3.5) | 8 (1.3) |
| Age > 41 | Ref | 0.39 (0.27–0.57)*** | 0.35 (0.17–0.69)** | Ref | 0.27 (0.17–0.48)*** | 0.55 (0.21–1.42) | Ref | 0.18 (0.06–0.52)** | 0.64 (0.19–2.16) |
| Males | Ref | 1.13 (0.78–1.63) | 1.96 (0.94–4.11)* | Ref | 1.06 (0.63–1.77) | 1.94 (0.72–5.29) | Ref | 1.71 (0.64–4.64) | 1.42 (0.31–6.56) |
| Formal education | Ref | 0.90 (0.60–1.33) | 0.57 (0.29–1.13) | Ref | 1.16 (0.66–2.03) | 0.40 (0.14–1.10)* | Ref | 0.82 (0.29–2.34) | 2.63 (0.44–15.79) |
| Lowest wealth tertile | Ref | 2.03 (1.23–3.35)*** | 1.82 (0.71–4.65)** | Ref | 2.10 (1.10–3.99)** | 2.82 (0.83–9.55)* | Ref | 2.39 (0.65–8.35) | 2.60 (0.27–24.87) |
| Farmers | Ref | 1.06 (0.67–1.67) | 1.29 (0.43–3.84) | Ref | 1.10 (0.60–2.01) | 1.40 (0.23–8.51) | Ref | 1.13 (0.37–3.49) | 0.54 (0.04–6.69) |
| Semi-urban area | Ref | 1.44 (0.94–2.20)* | 1.55 (0.60–4.02) | Ref | 1.33 (0.73–2.45) | 1.66 (0.54–5.10) | Ref | 0.48 (0.18–1.33) | 0.63 (0.15–2.67) |
| Poor hygiene score > 3 | Ref | 1.11 (0.71–1.74) | 3.10 (1.22–7.83)** | Ref | 1.02 (0.56–1.85) | 4.79 (1.26–18.16)** | Ref | 0.69 (0.24–2.01) | 3.59 (1.00–12.90)** |
Estimates represent increase or decrease in odds of S. mansoni only infection or S. mansoni co-infection compared to no infection. All estimates were derived from multivariable multinomial logistic regression models including all sociodemographic variables. Poor hygiene score combines lack of household toilet, use of surface water, disposal of household waste or toilet water in nature or open and poor handwashing, faecal handling or water storage practices. Median (IQR) of poor hygiene score is 3 (2)
IQR interquartile range, aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence intervals, Ref. reference
‡S. mansoni co-infection with either Plasmodium, S. haematobium or hookworm;
*P-value between 0.05 and 0.1; **P-value < 0.05; ***P-value < 0.001
Model 1: All participants (n = 805); S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz or point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA);
Model 2: n = 695; S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz or POC-CCA test (excluding trace positive-only cases);
Model 3: n = 626; S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz test (excluding all POC-CCA positive-only cases)
Association between Schistosoma mansoni infection status and health-related outcomes according to the diagnostic method
| Health-related variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No infection | No infection | No infection | |||||||
| N (%) | 596 (74.0) | 170 (21.1) | 39 (4.9) | 596 (85.8) | 78 (11.2) | 21 (3.0) | 596 (95.2) | 22 (3.5) | 8 (1.3) |
| Self-rated poor health | Ref | 1.84 (0.84–4.03) | 2.16 (0.57–8.27) | Ref | 0.78 (0.17–3.53) | 4.59 (1.06–19.92) ** | Ref | NA | 8.35 (1.24–56.32) ** |
| Healthcare use | Ref | 1.11 (0.72–1.72) | 0.55 (0.27–1.13) * | Ref | 1.12 (0.62–2.03) | 0.35 (0.14–0.88) ** | Ref | 1.12 (0.39–3.22) | 0.27 (0.06–1.18) * |
| Anaemia | Ref | 0.84 (0.52–1.33) | 0.47 (0.16–1.39) | Ref | 0.61 (0.30–1.24) | 0.18 (0.02–1.42) | Ref | 0.22 (0.03–1.68) | NA |
| Underweight | Ref | 0.61 (0.29–1.30 | 1.64 (0.63–4.29) | Ref | 0.96 (0.39–2.38) | 2.68 (0.90–8.02) * | Ref | 1.58 (0.43–5.77) | 1.52 (0.22–13.09) |
| Abdominal pain | Ref | 1.00 (0.69–1.45) | 0.89 (0.44–1.80) | Ref | 1.52 (0.92–2.52) * | 1.11 (0.44–2.81) | Ref | 2.32 (0.91–5.92) * | 0.37 (0.07–1.99) |
| Pain score > 2 | Ref | 1.03 (0.71–1.49) | 0.87 (0.42–1.78) | Ref | 1.29 (0.78–2.14) | 1.46 (0.68–3.64) | Ref | 2.54 (1.03–6.28) ** | 0.94 (0.21–4.14) |
| Symptom score > 4 | Ref | 0.84 (0.58–1.22) | 0.61 (0.29–1.26) | Ref | 1.14 (0.69–1.88) | 1.08 (0.43–2.73) | Ref | 3.19 (1.18–8.67) ** | 0.64 (0.14–2.92) |
Estimates represent increase or decrease in odds of each outcome in S. mansoni only positive and S. mansoni co-infection compared to no infection. All estimates were derived from multivariable logistic regression models (one for each health-related outcome) containing the S. mansoni infection status and hygiene variables. Pain score included general body pain, pain severity, abdominal pain and pain medication. Median (IQR) of pain score was 2 (2). Symptom score included general body pain, pain severity, abdominal pain, pain medication, fatigue, blood in stool, blood in the urine, fever, nausea or vomiting and diarrhoea. Median (IQR) of symptom score was 4 (3). n.a. not applicable due to absence of self-rated poor health or anaemia in this group
IQR interquartile range, OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals, Ref. reference, NA not available
‡S. mansoni co-infection with either Plasmodium, S. haematobium or hookworm;
*P-value between 0.05 and 0.1; **P-value < 0.05
Model 1: All participants (n = 805); S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz or point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA);
Model 2: n = 695; S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz or POC-CCA test (excluding trace positive-only cases);
Model 3: n = 626; S. mansoni defined as positive Kato-Katz test (excluding all POC-CCA positive-only cases)