| Literature DB >> 27756339 |
Séverine Erismann1,2, Serge Diagbouga3, Peter Odermatt1,2, Astrid M Knoblauch1,2, Jana Gerold1,2, Akina Shrestha1,2,4, Tarnagda Grissoum3, Aminata Kaboré3, Christian Schindler1,2, Jürg Utzinger1,2, Guéladio Cissé5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unsafe drinking water, unimproved sanitation and lack of hygiene pose health risks, particularly to children in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasitic infections in school-aged children in two regions of Burkina Faso.Entities:
Keywords: Burkina Faso; Helminths; Hygiene; Intestinal protozoa; Polyparasitism; Sanitation; Water
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27756339 PMCID: PMC5069922 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1835-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Intestinal parasitic infections among schoolchildren in the two regions of Burkina Faso, February 2015
Characteristics of the study population in the two regions of Burkina Faso in February 2015
| Children’s demographic characteristics ( | [ | Plateau Central [ | Centre-Ouest [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Girls | 188 (48.8) | 97 (49.0) | 91 (48.7) | |
| Boys | 197 (51.2) | 101 (51.0) | 96 (51.3) | |
| Age of childrena | ||||
| Age group 1 (8–11 years) | 251 (65.2) | 147 (74.2) | 104 (55.6) | |
| Age group 2 (12–14 years) | 134 (34.8) | 51 (25.8) | 83 (44.4) | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Mossi | 262 (68.1) | 189 (95.5) | 73 (39.0) | |
| Gourunsi | 114 (29.6) | 1 (0.5) | 113 (60.5) | |
| Others (Dioula, Peulh) | 9 (2.3) | 8 (4.0) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Caregiver’s socioeconomic characteristics ( | ||||
| Roof material | Simple (natural and baked clay) | 37 (9.6) | 12 (6.1) | 25 (13.4) |
| Metal cover | 348 (90.4) | 186 (93.9) | 162 (86.6) | |
| Wall material | Simple (natural clay) | 359 (93.3) | 182 (91.9) | 177 (94.7) |
| Baked or cemented clay | 26 (6.7) | 16 (8.1) | 10 (5.3) | |
| Floor material | Simple (clay, sand, mud, straw) | 255 (66.2) | 115 (58.1) | 140 (74.9) |
| Baked or cemented clay | 130 (33.8) | 83 (41.9) | 47 (25.1) | |
| Energy used | Simple (charcoal, firewood) | 376 (97.7) | 191 (96.5) | 185 (98.9) |
| Electricity and gas | 9 (2.3) | 7 (3.5) | 2 (1.1) | |
| Possession of domestic animals | 371 (96.4) | 187 (94.4) | 184 (98.4) | |
| Animals roaming freely in household | 246 (63.9) | 124 (62.6) | 122 (65.2) | |
| Caregiver’s sociodemographic characteristics ( | ||||
| Caregiver’s ageb | ||||
| No formal schooling | 288 (74.8) | 142 (71.7) | 146 (78.1) | |
| Primary education | 59 (15.3) | 28 (14.1) | 31 (16.6) | |
| Secondary or higher education | 38 (9.9) | 28 (14.1) | 10 (5.4) | |
| Main occupation of head of household | ||||
| Agriculture | 344 (89.4) | 180 (90.9) | 164 (87.7) | |
| Merchant | 8 (2.1) | 7 (3.5) | 1 (0.5) | |
| Civic service | 9 (2.3) | 3 (1.5) | 6 (3.2) | |
| Others (housework, retirement and no employment) | 24 (6.2) | 8 (4.0) | 16 (8.6) | |
a = mean age of 11.0 (±0.7) years; 10.8 (±0.1) in the Plateau Central and 11.2 (±0.1) in the Centre-Ouest
b = mean age of 45.0 (±14.2) years; 44.8 (±14.3) in the Plateau Central and 45.2 (±14.1) in the Centre-Ouest
Intestinal parasitic infections among schoolchildren in two regions of Burkina Faso in February 2015
| Parasite | Prevalence [ | Sexa | Age groupb | Regionc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | 8–11 | 12–14 | PCd | COd | ||
| Trematodes | |||||||
|
| 15 (3.9) | 7 (3.7) | 8 (4.1) | 8 (3.2) | 7 (5.2) | 8 (4.0) | 7 (3.7) |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) |
| Total | 16 (4.2) | 7 (3.7) | 9 (4.6) | 8 (3.2) | 8 (6.0) | 8 (4.0) | 8 (4.3) |
| Nematodes | |||||||
| Hookworm | 3 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (1.5) | 2 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.1) |
| Cestodes | |||||||
|
| 25 (6.5) | 11 (5.9) | 14 (7.1) | 13 (5.2) | 12 (9.0) | 5 (2.5) | 20 (10.7) |
| Total faecal-oral transmitted helminthse | 27 (7.0) | 11 (5.9) | 16 (8.1) | 15 (6.0) | 12 (9.0) | 6 (3.0) | 21 (11.2) |
| Intestinal protozoa | |||||||
|
| 256 (66.5) | 131 (69.7) | 125 (63.5) | 163 (64.9) | 93 (69.4) | 110 (55.6) | 146 (78.1) |
|
| 144 (37.4) | 67 (35.6) | 77 (39.1) | 93 (37.1) | 51 (38.1) | 65 (32.8) | 79 (42.3) |
|
| 108 (28.1) | 44 (23.4) | 64 (32.5) | 69 (27.5) | 39 (29.1) | 49 (24.8) | 59 (31.6) |
|
| 90 (23.4) | 39 (20.7) | 51 (25.9) | 51 (20.3) | 39 (29.1) | 55 (27.8) | 35 (18.7) |
|
| 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) |
|
| 290 (75.3) | 144 (76.6) | 146 (74.1) | 182 (72.5) | 108 (80.6) | 130 (65.7) | 160 (85.6) |
| Total intestinal protozoaf | 326 (84.7) | 161 (85.6) | 165 (83.8) | 209 (83.3) | 117 (87.3) | 157 (79.3) | 169 (90.4) |
| Multiple intestinal parasitic infectiong | 206 (53.5) | 101 (53.7) | 105 (53.3) | 124 (49.4) | 82 (61.2) | 103 (48.0) | 111 (59.4) |
aSignificant differences in investigated parasite infection prevalence between boys and girls were found for Giardia intestinalis (P = 0.05)
b Trichomonas intestinalis and multiple parasitic infection prevalence were significantly different between age groups (P < 0.05)
cSignificant regional differences were found for Hymenolepis nana, any faecal-oral transmitted helminth, Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar, Entamoeba coli, Trichomonas intestinalis, Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar or Giardia intestinalis, total intestinal protozoa infection, and multiple intestinal parasitic infection (P < 0.05)
dPC, Plateau Central; CO, Centre-Ouest region of Burkina Faso
eThe category of total faecal-oral transmitted helminths includes children infected with hookworm and Hymenolepis nana. There was one child co-infected with hookworm and Hymenolepis nana
fSeveral children were co-infected with intestinal protozoa. The total of this category therefore does not sum up from the separate figures
gMultiple intestinal parasitic infection was defined as dichotomous variable, classified as > 1 infection vs ≤ 1 infection
Fig. 2Number of concurrent intestinal parasitic infections, stratified by region among 385 schoolchildren in Burkina Faso. Box plot: boxes illustrate the 25th and 75th percentiles (ptile), while the whiskers indicate the adjacent lower and upper values (values which are within 25th ptile – 1.5 * (75th – 25th ptile) and 75th ptile + 1.5 * (75th – 25th ptile), respectively) and values outside these bounds are plotted individually. The median is shown by the line within the boxes
Questionnaire findings and water quality in the two regions of Burkina Faso, February 2015
| Children ( | [ | Plateau Central [ | Centre-Ouest [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selected KAP indicatorsa | |||
| Handwashingb | |||
| Before eating | 338 (87.8) | 164 (82.8) | 174 (93.1) |
| After eating | 55 (14.3) | 25 (12.6) | 30 (16.0) |
| After playing | 28 (7.3) | 12 (6.1) | 16 (8.6) |
| After defaecation | 85 (22.1) | 41 (20.7) | 44 (23.5) |
| Do not wash hands | 16 (4.2) | 15 (7.6) | 1 (0.5) |
| Water only | 344 (89.4) | 183 (92.4) | 161 (86.1) |
| Water and soap | 306 (79.5) | 153 (77.3) | 153 (81.8) |
| With ash | 12 (3.1) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (6.4) |
| With mud | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) |
| Hygienec | |||
| Lower category (1) | 56 (14.6) | 33 (16.7) | 23 (12.3) |
| Middle score (2) | 227 (59.0) | 119 (60.1) | 108 (57.7) |
| Best category (3) | 102 (26.4) | 46 (23.2) | 56 (30.0) |
| Sanitary practices at schoolk | |||
| Using latrines at school | 307 (79.7) | 181 (91.4) | 126 (67.4) |
| Open defaecation (fields, bush) | 71 (18.5) | 12 (6.1) | 59 (31.5) |
| Using latrines at home/at teachers’ house | 7 (1.8) | 5 (2.5) | 2 (1.1) |
| Drinking waterd | |||
| Drinking water from school | 322 (83.6) | 174 (87.9) | 148 (79.1) |
| Bringing drinking water from home | 239 (62.1) | 112 (56.6) | 127 (67.9) |
| Quality of water in children’s drinking cups ( | |||
| Coliform bacteriak | 101 (89.4) | 46 (80.7) | 55 (98.2) |
|
| 55 (48.7) | 17 (29.8) | 38 (67.9) |
| Faecal streptococci | 101 (89.4) | 50 (87.7) | 51 (91.1) |
| Safe to drink without prior treatment | 3 (2.7) | 3 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Households ( | |||
| Household WASH characteristicse | |||
| Type of latrines used | |||
| Flush toilet (i) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| VIP latrinef (ii) | 14 (3.6) | 12 (6.1) | 2 (1.1) |
| Traditional pit latrine (iii) | 83 (21.6) | 65 (32.8) | 18 (9.6) |
| EcoSang (iv) | 60 (15.6) | 33 (16.7) | 27 (14.4) |
| Samplat latrine (v) | 15 (3.9) | 13 (6.6) | 2 (1.1) |
| No facilities/open defaecation (vi) | 213 (55.3) | 75 (37.9) | 138 (73.8) |
| Total improvedh (i, ii, iv, v) | 89 (23.1) | 58 (29.3) | 31 (16.6) |
| Total unimprovedi (iii, vi) | 296 (76.9) | 140 (70.7) | 156 (83.4) |
| Preferred source of drinking water during the rainy season | |||
| Private tab | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Shared tab | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Public tab | 25 (6.5) | 18 (9.1) | 7 (3.7) |
| Improved source | 4 (1.0) | 4 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Un-improved source | 8 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (4.3) |
| Borehole water | 249 (64.6) | 161 (81.3) | 88 (47.1) |
| Collected rain water | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Surface water | 3 (0.8) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.1) |
| Wells | 87 (22.6) | 14 (7.1) | 73 (39.0) |
| Others | 6 (1.5) | 1 (0.5) | 5 (2.7) |
| Preferred source of drinking water during the dry season | |||
| Private tab | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Shared tab | 2 (0.5) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Public tab | 25 (6.5) | 18 (9.1) | 7 (3.7) |
| Improved source | 4 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (2.1) |
| Un-improved source | 9 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (4.8) |
| Borehole water | 261 (67.8) | 168 (84.9) | 93 (49.7) |
| Surface water | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Wells | 81 (21.0) | 8 (4.0) | 73 (39.0) |
| Others | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) |
| Household drinking water storage | |||
| Open | 278 (72.2) | 141 (71.2) | 137 (73.3) |
| Pot or canary | 290 (75.3) | 146 (73.7) | 144 (77.0) |
| Basin or bowl | 16 (4.2) | 2 (1.0) | 14 (7.5) |
| Canister (plastic jerrican) | 59 (15.3) | 38 (19.2) | 21 (11.2) |
| Others | 18 (4.7) | 11 (5.6) | 7 (3.7) |
| No storage | 2 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) |
| Household drinking water treated prior to consumptionjk | 69 (17.9) | 21 (10.6) | 48 (25.7) |
| Water quality of household drinking water ( | |||
| Coliform bacteria | 89 (93.7) | 42 (89.4) | 47 (97.9) |
|
| 61 (64.2) | 23 (48.9) | 38 (79.2) |
| Faecal streptococci | 88 (92.6) | 42 (89.4) | 46 (95.8) |
| Safe to drink without prior treatment | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Water quality of community sources ( | |||
| Coliform bacteria | 13 (35.1) | 4 (22.4) | 9 (47.4) |
|
| 9 (24.3) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (47.4) |
| Faecal streptococci | 10 (27.0) | 2 (11.1) | 8 (42.1) |
| Safe to drink without prior treatment | 22 (59.5) | 12 (66.7) | 10 (52.6) |
aKnowledge, attitudes and practices
bMultiple responses were possible for the variables characterising the mode (how) and frequency (when) of handwashing
cA new variable for hygiene behaviour was created using factor analysis with the mode and frequency of handwashing. Children were classified into three categories with poor, middle and good hygiene behaviours
dMultiple responses were possible for the variables characterising the child’s drinking water consumption at school
eWater, sanitation, and hygiene
fVentilated improved pit (VIP) latrine is an improved type of pit latrine, which helps remove odours and prevent flies from breeding and escaping. Excreta are collected in a dry pit which has a vent pipe covered with a fly-proof screen at the top
gEcological sanitation (EcoSan) toilets are linked to a closed system that does not need water. The toilet is based on the principle of safely recycling excreta resources to create a valuable resource for agriculture
hThe improved sanitation category includes all sanitation facilities that hygienically separate human excreta from human contact; i.e. pit latrine with slab, VIP and EcoSan toilets
iThe unimproved sanitation category includes traditional pit latrines and no facilities (open defaecation)
jHouseholds having reported to treat their drinking water through filtration and sedimentation
kSignificant regional differences were found for children’s sanitary practices (dichotomised variable classified as using latrines vs. open defaecation, χ 2 = 4.67, df = 1, P = 0.03), water quality of children’s drinking water cups (coliform bacteria, χ 2 = 5.87, df = 1, P = 0.02; Escherichia coli, χ 2 = 15.51, df = 1, P < 0.001); household water treatment (P = 0.02); and water quality of household drinking water (Escherichia coli, χ 2 = 8.97, df = 7, P = 0.003) using mixed logistic regression models with random intercepts at the level of schools