| Literature DB >> 34983573 |
Kazuyoshi Baba1, Daisuke Chiba2, Yu Mori2, Yoshiyuki Kuwahara3, Atsushi Kogure2, Takehiro Sugaya2, Kumi Kamata4, Itsuki Oizumi4, Takayuki Suzuki2, Hiroaki Kurishima2, Soshi Hamada2, Eiji Itoi5, Toshimi Aizawa2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study examined the biomechanics of preventing excessive internal hip joint rotation related to the hip flexion angle.Entities:
Keywords: Cadaveric study; Capsular ligament; Dislocation; External rotator; Hip joint; Ischiofemoral ligament; Total hip arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34983573 PMCID: PMC8725321 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02873-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Photographs of the cadavers showing A the insertion of the Phoenix Ankle Arthrodesis Nail to the right femur (a protractor was attached to the nail) and B pelvic fixation (using a posterior approach). c A schematic model providing an overview of the study settings. The hip flexion angle was the angle between the femur and the anterior pelvic plane
Fig. 2The angle-measurement method using a digital pull tension gauge. Photographs A and B demonstrate the methods used to measure the increasing angles using a digital pull tension gauge
Fig. 3Schematic models of the stepwise dissections of the hip rotator muscles and ischiofemoral ligament in the posterior hip approach and reverse order. A The cutting order of the right hip via the posterior approach, indicated by the arrow. B The cutting order of the left hip in the opposite order from the right hip, indicated by the arrow. c The cutting order of the ischiofemoral ligament, indicated by the dotted arrow. A, piriformis; B, superior gemellus; C, obturator internus; D, inferior gemellus; E, obturator externus
Fig. 4Increasing angles via the posterior approach from the piriformis to the obturator externus. The muscle name indicates the increased angle measured after muscle resection. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey–Kramer test
Fig. 5Increasing angles via the posterior approach from the obturator externus to the piriformis. The muscle name indicates the increased angle measured after muscle resection. * p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey–Kramer test
Increasing angles via the posterior approach from the piriformis to the obturator externus. The muscle name indicates the increased angle measured after muscle resection. The data are presented as averages ± standard deviations
| Piriformis | Superior gemellus | Obturator internus | Inferior gemellus | Obturator externus | Ischiofemoral ligament | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hip flexion 0° | 1.8° ± 1.0° | 3.2° ± 0.5° | 2.7° ± 0.8° | 3.4° ± 1.7° | 3.8° ± 1.1° | 8.4° ± 5.1° |
| Hip flexion 30° | 1.6° ± 1.3° | 2.6° ± 1.3° | 3.8° ± 1.1° | 4.7° ± 1.3° | 4.6° ± 1.3° | 15.5° ± 5.7° |
| Hip flexion 60° | 1.6° ± 1.1° | 2.0° ± 0.9° | 2.1° ± 2.0° | 1.1° ± 2.9° | 2.5° ± 3.8° | 10.2° ± 5.8° |
Increasing angles via the posterior approach from the obturator externus to the piriformis. The muscle name indicates the increased angle measured after muscle resection. The data are presented as averages ± standard deviations
| Obturator externus | Inferior gemellus | Obturator internus | Superior gemellus | Piriformis | Ischiofemoral ligament | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hip flexion 0° | 1.6° ± 2.2° | 2.4° ± 1.6° | 3.2° ± 3.0° | 5.3° ± 2.9° | 4.5° ± 4.1° | 10.5° ± 3.1° |
| Hip flexion 30° | 0.8° ± 2.9° | 1.9° ± 3.4° | 4.7° ± 4.2° | 4.8° ± 3.7° | 3.3° ± 5.9° | 18.1° ± 4.8° |
| Hip flexion 60° | 0.6° ± 3.4° | 1.5° ± 2.5° | 3.2° ± 4.0° | 2.9° ± 5.6° | 1.8° ± 5.6° | 13.3° ± 10.9° |