Pedram Keshavarz1,2,3, Steven S Raman4. 1. School of Science and Technology, The University of Georgia, 77a, M. Kostava str., 0171, Tbilisi, Georgia. Keshavarz.p2390@gmail.com. 2. Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology of New Hospitals LTD, Tbilisi, Georgia. Keshavarz.p2390@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), 757 Westwood Plaza, Suite 1638, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. Keshavarz.p2390@gmail.com. 4. Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), 757 Westwood Plaza, Suite 1638, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy of three combination therapies, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CRA) for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Online databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched. RESULTS: Forty-two studies with 5468 pooled patients (TACE + RFA: 21 studies with 3398 patients, TACE + MWA:14 studies with 1477 patients, and TACE + CRA: 7 studies with 593 patients) reported combination therapy versus TACE alone. The TACE + MWA subcohort had the best odds of long-term overall survival (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.44, 16.08, P = 0.011) and objective response rate (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.34, 6.61, P < 0.001) compared with the other two combination subcohorts. The TACE + RFA and TACE + MWA subcohorts had approximately similar odds of 1-year recurrence-free survival (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13, 12.75, P < 0.001 and OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.70, 12.51, P = 0.003, respectively). The disease control rate was similar between the TACE + MWA and TACE + CRA subcohorts (OR 4.01, 95% CI 2.66, 6.04, P < 0.001 and OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.68, 9.74, P = 0.002) but greater than the TACE + RFA subcohort (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.14, 4.86, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, the TACE + MWA subcohort had the best efficacy and outcomes, especially for younger patients (less than 60-year-old) with tumor size of ≤ 3 cm, compared with the TACE + RFA or TACE + CRA subcohorts.
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy of three combination therapies, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CRA) for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Online databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched. RESULTS: Forty-two studies with 5468 pooled patients (TACE + RFA: 21 studies with 3398 patients, TACE + MWA:14 studies with 1477 patients, and TACE + CRA: 7 studies with 593 patients) reported combination therapy versus TACE alone. The TACE + MWA subcohort had the best odds of long-term overall survival (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.44, 16.08, P = 0.011) and objective response rate (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.34, 6.61, P < 0.001) compared with the other two combination subcohorts. The TACE + RFA and TACE + MWA subcohorts had approximately similar odds of 1-year recurrence-free survival (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13, 12.75, P < 0.001 and OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.70, 12.51, P = 0.003, respectively). The disease control rate was similar between the TACE + MWA and TACE + CRA subcohorts (OR 4.01, 95% CI 2.66, 6.04, P < 0.001 and OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.68, 9.74, P = 0.002) but greater than the TACE + RFA subcohort (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.14, 4.86, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, the TACE + MWA subcohort had the best efficacy and outcomes, especially for younger patients (less than 60-year-old) with tumor size of ≤ 3 cm, compared with the TACE + RFA or TACE + CRA subcohorts.
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 11.105