Literature DB >> 31852267

The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lei Wang1, Qiao Ke2, Nanping Lin2, Qizhen Huang1, Yongyi Zeng2, Jingfeng Liu2,3.   

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical value of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients and methods: Eligible studies were identified using PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, investigating the synergistic effect of TACE + MWA in the treatment of advanced HCC. Endpoints were the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates, local control rate (LCR), objective remission rate (ORR), and adverse event (AE). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size.
Results: Nine studies including 351 patients in the TACE + MWA group and 653 patients in the TACE group were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were in favor of TACE + MWA (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 2.26-4.79; OR = 2.82, 95% CI 2.01-3.95; OR = 4.50, 95% CI 2.96-6.86; respectively). The pooled OR for the ORR and LCR were also in favor of TACE + MWA (OR = 4.64, 95%CI 3.11-6.91; OR = 3.93, 95% CI 2.64-5.87; respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of severe AE was observed between TACE + MWA group and TACE group (p > .05). However, subgroup analysis showed that patients with tumor size >5 cm were more likely to be benefited from TACE + MWA, rather than patients with tumor size ≤5 cm.
Conclusion: With the current data, we concluded that combination TACE and MWA was safe, and should be strongly recommended to unresectable patients with tumor size >5 cm, but TACE alone was enough for unresectable patients with tumor size ≤5 cm. However, the conclusion needs further validation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; local contral; meta-analysis; microwave ablation; objective remission rate; transarterial chemoembolization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31852267     DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1692148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  5 in total

Review 1.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

2.  Comparison of combined transarterial chemoembolization and ablations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedram Keshavarz; Steven S Raman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 3.  Local and Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Future Combinations.

Authors:  Adam Hatzidakis; Lukas Müller; Miltiadis Krokidis; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation therapy vs. microwave ablation alone for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary investigation of clinical value.

Authors:  Juanfang Liu; Wenguang Zhang; Huibin Lu; Hongbin Li; Xueliang Zhou; Jing Li; Xinwei Han
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.322

5.  Efficacy and safety of computed tomography-guided microwave ablation with fine needle-assisted puncture positioning technique for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ming-Zhi Hao; Yu-Bin Hu; Qi-Zhong Chen; Zhang-Xian Chen; Hai-Lan Lin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.