Literature DB >> 34978387

Diverse myopathological features in the congenital myasthenia syndrome with GFPT1 mutation.

Kaiyan Jiang1, Yilei Zheng1, Jing Lin1,2, Xiaorong Wu3, Yanyan Yu1, Min Zhu1,2, Xin Fang1,2, Meihong Zhou1, Xiaobing Li1, Daojun Hong1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mutations in the GFPT1 gene are associated with a particular subtype of congenital myasthenia syndrome (CMS) called limb-girdle myasthenia with tubular aggregates. However, not all patients show tubular aggregates in muscle biopsy, suggesting the diversity of myopathology should be further investigated.
METHODS: In this study, we reported two unrelated patients clinically characterized by easy fatigability, limb-girdle muscle weakness, positive decrements of repetitive stimulation, and response to pyridostigmine. The routine examinations of myopathology were conducted. The causative gene was explored by whole-exome screening. In addition, we summarized all GFPT1-related CMS patients with muscle biopsy in the literature.
RESULTS: Pathogenic biallelic GFPT1 mutations were identified in the two patients. In patient one, muscle biopsy indicated vacuolar myopathic changes and atypical pathological changes of myofibrillar myopathy characterized by desmin deposits, Z-disc disorganization, and electronic dense granulofilamentous aggregation. In patient two, muscle biopsy showed typical myopathy with tubular aggregates. Among the 51 reported GFPT1-related CMS patients with muscle biopsy, most of them showed tubular aggregates myopathy, while rimmed vacuolar myopathy, autophagic vacuolar myopathy, mitochondria-like myopathy, neurogenic myopathy, and unspecific myopathic changes were also observed in some patients. These extra-synaptic pathological changes might be associated with GFPT1-deficiency hypoglycosylation and altered function of muscle-specific glycoproteins, as well as partly responsible for the permanent muscle weakness and resistance to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with GFPT1-related CMS had tubular aggregates in the muscle biopsy, but some patients could show great diversities of the pathological change. The myopathological findings might be a biomarker to predict the prognosis of the disease.
© 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital myasthenia syndrome; glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 1; myopathological changes; tubular aggregates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34978387      PMCID: PMC8865156          DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav            Impact factor:   3.405


INTRODUCTION

Congenital myasthenia syndrome (CMS) includes a large group of rare inherited endplate myopathies characterized by dysfunctions of neuromuscular junction transmission due to genetic defects (Engel et al., 2015; Finsterer, 2019). CMS shows great clinical and genetic heterogeneities characterized by abnormal fatigability, transient or permanent muscle weakness with varied age of onset. The main inheritance pattern of this disease is autosomal recessive, but a small part is inherited in autosomal dominant mode. There are at least 32 kinds of genes that have been identified in CMSs, while the number is still being updated (Iyadurai, 2020). Mutations in CHRNA1, CHRNB1, CHRND, or CHRNE are the most causative genes accounting for more than 30% of the cases, while mutations in RAPSN, COLQ, and DOK7 involve about 10% to 15% of the cases, and GFPT1 is accountable to approximately 3% of the cases (Engel et al., 2015; Finsterer, 2019). Among the various types of CMS, the limb‐girdle form is characterized by a muscle weakness and fatigability predominant in proximal muscles with minor or no involvement of ocular, facial, and bulbar muscles (Belaya et al., 2012). Mutations in the glutamine‐fructose‐6‐phosphate transaminase 1 (GFPT1, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM]:138292) gene encoding a ubiquitous enzyme for biosynthesis pathway of protein glycosylation are responsible for a specific CMS subtype called limb‐girdle myasthenia with tubular aggregates (OMIM:610542) (Huh et al., 2012; Senderek et al., 2011). Although genetic screening may be conveniently available for these patients through next‐generation sequence (NGS), muscle biopsy is typically the first assessment conducted in these CMS patients who predominantly present with limb‐girdle muscle weakness. Considering that some subtypes of CMS may be treatable genetic diseases, it is very important to make a timely diagnosis as early as possible (Farmakidis et al., 2018). Therefore, accurate identification of the various myopathological changes is very important to the diagnosis of CMS. However, not all patients show tubular aggregates in muscle biopsy (Guergueltcheva et al., 2012), suggesting a need to re‐recognize and summarize the diversity of muscle pathology in patients with CMS associated with GFPT1 mutations. In this study, we described two CMS patients with GFPT1 mutations: one presented with vacuolar myopathy with myofibrillar destruction, and the other showed typical myopathy with tubular aggregates. To further explore the pathological characteristics of CMS caused by GFPT1 mutation, we summarized the muscle pathological features in all reported GFPT1‐related CMS cases with muscle biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Patients with GFPT1 mutations were recruited from our in‐home database including 15 patients with CMS between January 2016 and June 2021. The inclusion criteria of CMS included fatigable muscle weakness presenting with ptosis, ophthalmoparesis, facial and bulbar, and generalized muscle involvement; positive changes of neuromuscular junction in electrophysiological assessments; and/or causative mutations in CMS‐related genes. A battery of clinical and laboratory investigations were conducted to exclude the inflammatory, toxic, or metabolic origins. A detailed medical history was obtained from the subjects and their relatives. Information regarding age of onset, progression of disease, family history, and other clinical manifestations was collected. Electrophysiological study was performed in the nerves using a standard method with surface electrodes for stimulation and recording.

Ethical statement

All patients’ tissue samples were obtained after a written consent signed by each individual in compliance with the bioethics laws of China as well as the Declaration of Helsinki. The research was approved by ethics committee of the first affiliated hospital of Nanchang University.

Genetic screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples. The NGS was commercially supported by Running Gene Inc. (Beijing, China). In brief, targeted exon enrichment was performed using SureSelect Human All Exon V5 (Agilent Technologies). The exon‐enriched DNA libraries were subjected to paired‐end sequencing with the Hiseq 2000 platform (Illumina, Inc.). Sequence data were mapped with BWA (Li & Durbin, 2009) and SAMTOOLS (Li et al., 2009) onto the hg19 human genome as a reference. Calls with variant quality less than 20 were filtered out, and 95% of the targeted bases were covered sufficiently to pass our thresholds for calling single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), nonsynonymous/splice acceptor and donor site, insertions or deletions (NS/SS/InDel) variants in the dbSNP v137, ESP6500, and 1000 Genome were removed. Synonymous changes were filtered using SIFT software (http://sift.jcvi.org). Sanger sequencing with specific primers was conducted to confirm the GFPT1 mutation in the patients and their available family members.

Muscle pathological examination

Muscle biopsies were performed from the right bicep or left gastrocnemius of the two cases, respectively. The muscle tissue was frozen and then cut at 8 μm sections. These sections were stained according to standard histological and enzyme histochemical procedures with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), modified Gomori trichrome (MGT), periodic acidic Schiff (PAS), oil red O (ORO), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide tetrazolium reductase (NADH‐TR), succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), cytochrome c oxidase (COX), nonspecific esterase (NSE), and ATPase stain. Antibodies of desmin (Abcam, ab6322, 1:100), dystrophin (Leica Biosystems, NLC‐DYS2, 1:20), dysferlin (Leica Biosystems, Ham1/7B6, 1:40) and MHC‐I (Dako, R7000, 1:200) were used to detect the distribution of protein in the muscle specimens by immunohistochemical stain. For electron microscopy, muscle specimens were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer and post‐fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer. Specimens were then dehydrated and embedded in Epon 812. The ultrathin sections of muscle tissue were double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and then examined with an electron microscope (JEM‐1230 JEOL Inc. Tokyo, Japan).

Literature review

We searched the literature in multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Google Scholar database using the keywords “congenital myasthenia syndrome” and “GFPT1 gene.” All included cases were required to have muscle biopsy, then the clinical characteristics, laboratory results, treatments, complications and outcomes of all patients were summarized and reanalyzed.

RESULTS

Clinical features

Patient one

The patient was a 37‐year‐old man who had limb weakness for more than 30 years. At age 5, the patient has noticed poor ability in walking and running compared to his peers. At age 15, he had difficulty in standing up after squatting, and frequently falling down. The symptom of muscle weakness was better in the morning, but worse in the evening. He was diagnosed with myasthenia gravis. Corticosteroid was initially administered, but no efficacy was observed. Afterward, he showed some responses to pyridostigmine, while the muscle weakness gradually progressed to walking difficulty and bath inability. His family history was unremarkable. Physical examination on admission revealed symmetrical limb weakness without facial, bulbar, neck, and respiratory muscle involvement. Muscle strength (Medical Research Council, MRC) was 4 grade in the proximal upper limbs, 5‐ grade in the distal upper limbs, 3 grade in the proximal lower limbs, and 4 grade in the distal lower limbs. Deep tendon reflexes were decreased. Pathological reflexes were negative. No muscle atrophy or fasciculation could be observed. There was no evidence of sensory disturbance, ataxia, or autonomic dysfunction. The blood count, blood biochemistry, thyroid function, parathyroid hormone, blood acylcarnitines and urine organic acid profiles, paraneoplastic antibody spectrum, and antibodies of myasthenia gravis were all negative. Muscle MRI of thigh revealed a slightly diffused hyperintensity on T1WI except adductor magnus and semimembranosus muscles; and muscle MRI of leg also showed a slightly diffused hyperintensity except medial gastrocnemius (Figure 1a). Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and electromyography (EMG) were not obvious abnormal. Nevertheless, repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) at 3 Hz revealed positive decrements of compound muscular action potential (CMAP) in the deltoid.
FIGURE 1

Muscle MRI changes of lower limb in patient one (a) and patient two (b) with GFPT1‐related CMS. Thigh level showed a slightly diffused hyperintensity on T1WI except adductor magnus and semimembranosus muscles; leg level showed a slightly diffused hyperintensity except medial gastrocnemius that simultaneously had mild high‐signal on STIR

Muscle MRI changes of lower limb in patient one (a) and patient two (b) with GFPT1‐related CMS. Thigh level showed a slightly diffused hyperintensity on T1WI except adductor magnus and semimembranosus muscles; leg level showed a slightly diffused hyperintensity except medial gastrocnemius that simultaneously had mild high‐signal on STIR

Patient two

The patient was a 21‐year‐old man who had limb weakness for 14 years. At age 7, he showed a poor performance in physical education class, and had a little difficulty in running and stairs climbing. Since then, he had complained of muscle fatigue and fluctuating weakness. He was diagnosed with lipid storage disease at age 12, and was given riboflavin and coenzyme Q10, but no benefits were observed. On this admission, he showed permanent weakness characterized by difficulties in climbing stairs, standing up after squatting, and combing hair. Physical examination showed waddling gait and symmetrical proximal limb weakness without facial, bulbar, neck, and respiratory muscle involvement. Muscle strength was 3+ grade in the proximal upper limbs, 5‐ grade in the distal upper limbs, 3 grade in the proximal lower limbs, and 4+ grade in the distal lower limbs. Deep tendon reflexes could be induced. Pathological reflexes were negative. No muscle atrophy or fasciculation could be observed. No evidence of sensory disturbance, ataxia, or autonomic dysfunction was noticed. The blood count, blood biochemistry, thyroid function, parathyroid hormone, blood acylcarnitines and urine organic acid profiles, and antibodies of myasthenia gravis were all negative. Muscle MRI of thigh revealed a mildly diffused hyperintensity on T1WI; and muscle MRI of leg also showed a slightly diffused hyperintensity except medial gastrocnemius that simultaneously had mild hyperintensity on STIR (short tau inversion recovery) (Figure 1b). NCV had no abnormality. EMG showed rapid recruitment of motor units suggestive of a myopathic pattern. In addition, RNS at 3 Hz revealed positive decrements in the deltoid and abductor digiti minimi muscle.

Genetic findings

Genetic sequencing disclosed compound heterozygous mutations in GFPT1: c.331C > T (p.R111C) and c.332G > A (p.R111H) in the patient one (Figure 2a); c.331C > T (p.R111C) and c.1534C > T (p.R512W) in the patient two (Figure 2b). The variants co‐segregated with their parents: c.332G > A was from the mother and c.331C > T was from the father; c.331C > T was from the mother and c.1534C > T was from the father. All variants have been previously reported in other patients, and had a very low allele frequency in gnomAD database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org, v2.1.1, Table S1). A homology search in different species demonstrated that the amino acids at residues 111 and 512 were evolutionally highly conserved, respectively (Figure 2c). The variants were predicted to be damaging by several in silico tools. The significance of variants was evaluated as pathogenic according to the American College Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria (Li et al., 2017). No causative mutations associated with other CMS or myopathies were found in the genetic screening.
FIGURE 2

Genetic mutations in the GFPT1 gene. Genetic sequencing disclosed compound heterozygous mutations c.331C > T and c.332G > A in patient one (a); c.331C > T and c.1534C > T in patient two (b). The variants co‐segregated with their parents. Residues arginine 111 and 512 have high evolutionary conservations (c)

Genetic mutations in the GFPT1 gene. Genetic sequencing disclosed compound heterozygous mutations c.331C > T and c.332G > A in patient one (a); c.331C > T and c.1534C > T in patient two (b). The variants co‐segregated with their parents. Residues arginine 111 and 512 have high evolutionary conservations (c)

Muscle pathological changes

The myopathological changes of patient one showed an appearance of multiple small vacuoles (Figure 3a) and a few rimmed vacuoles (Figure 3b) in some fibers, accompanied with variation of fiber size, central nuclei, fiber splitting and mild interstitial proliferation. Some fibers with small vacuoles had dark aggregations on MGT stain (Figure 3c). The small vacuoles were negative to ORO, PAS, and NADH stain (Figure 3d,e), but some affected fibers were positive to NSE (Figure 3f), dystrophin (Figure 3g), desmin (Figure 3h), dysferlin, and MHC‐I (Figure 3i). On the other side, the muscle pathological features of patient two revealed tubular aggregates myopathy characterized by multiple basophilic materials deposition, variation of fiber size, central nuclei, and mild interstitial proliferation (Figure 3j). The affected fibers with tubular aggregates also showed abnormal depositions on MGT (Figure 3k), NADH (Figure 3l,m), and NSE (Figure 3n) stain. Some fibers had an immuno‐reactivity to MHC‐I (Figure 3o), but absence of desmin (Figure 3p) or other proteins aggregation.
FIGURE 3

The myopathological changes in the two patients. Muscle biopsy in patient one showed multiple small vacuoles on HE stain (a), a few rimmed vacuoles (b) on MGT stain. Some fibers with small vacuoles had dark aggregations on MGT stain (c), negative to NADH stain (d,e), but positive to NSE (f), dystrophin (g), desmin (h), and MHC‐I (i). The muscle biopsy in patient two revealed tubular aggregates (j), which were dark on MGT (k), NADH (l,m), and NSE (n) stain. Some fibers had an immuno‐reactivity to MHC‐I (o), but not to desmin (p)

The myopathological changes in the two patients. Muscle biopsy in patient one showed multiple small vacuoles on HE stain (a), a few rimmed vacuoles (b) on MGT stain. Some fibers with small vacuoles had dark aggregations on MGT stain (c), negative to NADH stain (d,e), but positive to NSE (f), dystrophin (g), desmin (h), and MHC‐I (i). The muscle biopsy in patient two revealed tubular aggregates (j), which were dark on MGT (k), NADH (l,m), and NSE (n) stain. Some fibers had an immuno‐reactivity to MHC‐I (o), but not to desmin (p) Ultrastructural examination of patient one revealed that numerous fibers harbored dilated and degenerating vesicular profiles (Figure 4a) in which were filled with autophagic vacuoles (Figure 4b), pleomorphic myeloid bodies, vacuolated mitochondria, lipofuscin granules, and bizarre debris (Figure 4c). Some fibers showed disorganization of myofibrillar structure with Z line disturbance, and some electronic dense granulofilamentous deposits under the sarcolemma and between the myofibrils (Figure 4d). In addition, some endplates appeared reduced and poorly developed junctional folds with electronic dense materials (Figure 4e). Ultrastructural examination of patient two showed local destructions of myofibrillar structure with multiple tubular aggregates (Figure 4f).
FIGURE 4

Muscle ultrastructural changes in the two patients. The muscle fibers harbored many degenerating vacuoles (a, arrow) and autophagic vacuoles (b, arrow) with myeloid bodies, vacuolated mitochondria (c, arrow), and bizarre debris (c, arrow head). Some fibers showed Z line disturbance and electronic dense granulofilamentous deposits between the myofibrils (d, arrow). Some endplates appeared reduced junctional folds (e, arrow) with ring‐like electronic dense materials (e, arrow head). Ultrastructural examination of patient two showed multiple tubular aggregates (f, arrow)

Muscle ultrastructural changes in the two patients. The muscle fibers harbored many degenerating vacuoles (a, arrow) and autophagic vacuoles (b, arrow) with myeloid bodies, vacuolated mitochondria (c, arrow), and bizarre debris (c, arrow head). Some fibers showed Z line disturbance and electronic dense granulofilamentous deposits between the myofibrils (d, arrow). Some endplates appeared reduced junctional folds (e, arrow) with ring‐like electronic dense materials (e, arrow head). Ultrastructural examination of patient two showed multiple tubular aggregates (f, arrow)

Response to therapy

The patient one has been taking pyridostigmine (180 mg/day) since the age of 15. The medicine worked well at first 15 years while the response became less pronounced gradually. After a definite diagnosis, he was prescribed salbutamol (6 mg/day) and fluoxetine (20 mg/day), but his symptoms showed no significant alleviation. After joint prescription to patient two of pyridostigmine (180 mg/day) and albuterol (6 mg/day), his symptoms of muscular weakness improved considerably.

Muscle pathological review

We summarized all reported cases of GFPT1‐related CMS in the past 10 years from 2011 to the present. A total of 77 patients with clinical details were reviewed (Table S2), of which 51 patients with muscle biopsy were summarized (Aharoni et al., 2017; Bauché et al., 2017; Guergueltcheva et al., 2012; Helman et al., 2019; Huh et al., 2012; Luo et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2021; Maselli et al., 2014; Matsumoto et al., 2019; Natera‐De Benito et al., 2017; O'grady et al., 2016; Prior & Ghosh, 2021; Selcen et al., 2013; Selvam et al., 2018; Senderek et al., 2011; Szelinger et al., 2020; Yiş et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2021). The first symptoms were noted in the first decade of life in 42 of 51 patients (range from 0 to 19, median 6 years old). Besides apneic spells and survival crisis in a few patients at birth, most of them started with muscle weakness, fatigue or frequent falls due to the involvement of proximal limbs. All 51 patients showed limb‐girdle weakness, 26 (51.0%) had distal muscle weakness, 6 (11.8%) had neck weakness, 6 (11.8%) had respiratory muscle involvement, 5 (9.8%) had bulbar paralysis, and only 2 (3.9%) patients had slight ptosis. Muscle biopsies revealed tubular aggregates in most patients, while some showed multiple pathological features (Table 1): 36 (70.6%) patients showed pure tubular aggregates; 10 (19.6%) patients presented with unspecific or mild myopathy changes but tubular aggregates accompanied in 6 patients; rimmed vacuoles occurred in 4 (7.8%) cases but simultaneously with tubular aggregates; ragged red fibers were found in 4 (7.8%) cases; neurogenic features were presented in 3 (5.9%) cases; 2 (3.9%) patients showed mild necrotizing myopathy with extensive autophagic vacuolar pathology; and 2 (3.9%) patients showed a dystrophic pattern.
TABLE 1

The clinical and pathological summarization of GFPT1‐related CMS patients with muscle biopsy

Muscle biopsy findings
ReferencesPatientSex/AAO/AAD/ethnicClinical featuresGFPT1 mutationsLight microscopeElectron microscope
Guergueltcheva 20121M/6/31/IranianFatigue, fluctuating LGM, distal involvementp.D348Y (homo)TAs, type 1 fibre predominance, atrophy fibersND
Guergueltcheva 20122F6/26/TurkFluctuating LGM, fatigue, painp.W240X (homo)TAs, type 2 fibers predominance, chronic myopathyND
Guergueltcheva 20123NA/6/23‐35/LibyanLGM, fatiguep.R111C (homo)Small TAsTAs
Guergueltcheva 20124M/14/55/SpanishLGMp.M492T; c.*22C > ATAs, RRF, mild myopathic changes, type 1 fibre predominanceTAs
Guergueltcheva 20125M/10/50/SpanishFluctuating LGM, fallsp.M492T; c.*22C > ATAs, RRF, unspecific myopathic changes, type 1 fibre predominanceTAs
Guergueltcheva 20126M/5/16/GermanFluctuating LGMp.D43V; p.I121TTAs, unspecific myopathic changesND
Guergueltcheva 20127M/8/23/BritishLGM, facial and distal muscle involvementp.R385H; p.R434HTAs; vacuoles, denervation changesND
Guergueltcheva 20128M/6/37/BritishFluctuating LGM, distal limb involvementp.T15M; p.R496WTAsND
Guergueltcheva 20129F/13/26/GermanFluctuating LGM, fatiguep.V199F; c.*22 > ATAsND
Guergueltcheva 201210F/1/7/SenegaleseFluctuating LGMp.R512W (homo)TAs, uneven oxidative staining, mitochondria accumulationND
Guergueltcheva 201211M/7/19/SpanishLGMp.M491T (homo)Unspecific myopathic changesND
Guergueltcheva 201212M/1/37/SpanishFluctuating LGMc.1278_1281dup; c.*22C > AUnspecific myopathic changesND
Guergueltcheva 201213M/10′s/39/SpanishFluctuating LGMc.1278_1281dup; c.*22C > ATAs, unspecific myopathic changesTAs
Guergueltcheva 201214M/10/55/ItalianLGMp.T15A; c.621‐622delTAsTAs
Guergueltcheva 201215M/7/36/ItalianLGMUDTAsND
Guergueltcheva 201216M/10′s/40/SwedishFluctuating LGMp.222‐223insA; p.R111CTAsTAs, PMS
Guergueltcheva 201217F/8/9/MalteseFluctuating LGM, fatigability, learning difficultyp.M491T; c.714_715insASize variability, uneven enzyme stain, type 2 fiber predominanceND
Guergueltcheva 201218M/7/13/MalteseFluctuating LGM, fatigability, learning difficultyp.M491T; c.714_715insASize variability, uneven enzyme stainND
Huh 201219M/13/15/KoreanLGMp.E256Q; p.M499TTAsND
Selcen 201320M/0/16/NAPoor cry, apneic spells, LGM, distal limb involvementc.1700‐17 16dup17; c.*22C > ASmall TAs, RVPMS, PPM, multiple myeloid structures
Selcen 201321F/8/12/NALGM, distal limb involvementp.R545P; c.*22C > ASmall TAs, type 1 fiber predominancePMS, PPM
Selcen 201322F/12/20/NALGM, distal limb involvementc.606‐8A > G and c.*22C > ANeurogenic featuresPMS, PPM
Selcen 201323M/19/56/NANAp.D113G; p.M492TLarge TAs, small vacuolesPMS, PPM
Selcen 201324M/12/12/NALGM, distal limb involvementp.R17X; c*22C > ANeurogenic featuresNormal EPs, myeloid structures
Selcen 201325F/0/1 m/NAHypotonia, arthrogryposis, all weakness except ocular musclesc.686‐2A > G; p.R304XSmall TAs, RV, AV, regenerating fibers, type 1 fiber preponderancePMS, PPM, multiple autophagic vacuoles
Selcen 201326M/10/18/NALGM, distal limb involvementp.R111C (homo)TAsND
Selcen 201327F/9/64/NALGM, distal limb involvementp.T350I; c.1337delASmall TAs, RV, neurogenic featuresND
Selcen et al., 2013 28M/4/9/NALGM, distal limb involvementp.M1fsX2; p.T15MTAsND
Maselli 201429F/13/68/AmericanLGM, neck and distal limb involvementc IVS7‐8A > G; c.*22C > AType I fiber predominance and type II fiber atrophyPMS
O'Grady 201630F/0/13/AustralianCongenital hypotonia, contractures, scoliosisc.686‐2A > G; p.M358VDystrophic patternND
Yis 201731M/1/17/TurkLGM, axial weaknessc.686‐2A > G (homo)Dystrophic patternND
Bauche 201732NA/10′s/68/FrenchLGM, distal limb involvementp.G39_ K75delinsE; p.R111HTAsTAs, PMS, PPM
Bauche 201733NA/1/49/FrenchLGM, distal limb involvementp.R111C (homo)TAsND
Bauche 201734NA/6/18/FrenchLGM, distal limb involvementp.T392P; p.M499RTAsTAs, PMS, PPM
Bauche 201735f/6/16/FrenchLGM, distal limb involvement, transient ptosisp.R111C (homo)TAsND
Bauche 201736f/2.5/15/FrenchLGM, distal limb involvementp.R111C (homo)TAsPMS, PPM
Bauche 201737NA/15/21/FrenchLGM, distal limb involvementp.R111H; p.M317LTAsND
Helman 201938M/5/7/NepaleseLGM, bilateral retinoschisisp.R14L (homo)RRF, fiber degenerationND
Helman 201939M/0/5/AfghansHypotonia, LGMp.T151K (homo)RRF, fiber degenerationND
Matsumoto 201940F/1.5/38/JapaneseLGM, axial muscle atrophyc.722_723 insG (homo)TAs, mild myopathic changesND
Luo 201941M/5/23/ChineseTransient LGM, fatiguep.K154D; p.D363STAsND
Szelinger 202042M/0/8/MexicanCongenital hypotonia, low muscle bulk, dysphagiap.R230X (homo)Unspecific myopathic changesND
Szelinger 202043M/0/2/MexicanIntubated and resuscitationp.R230X (homo)Necrotizing myopathy, AVPMS
Ma 202144F/4/15/ChineseLGM, mild ptosisp.F5Y; p.F194STAs, RVTAs
Zhao 202145M/0/4/ChineseLower limbs weaknessp.R111C; p.A550TNonspecific myopathiesND
Zhao 202146M/6/14/ChineseLGMp.V650A (homo)TAsND
Zhao 202147M/5/18/ChineseLGMp.T15MTAsND
Zhao 202148M/0/17/ChineseUpper limbs weaknessp.Y367C; p.G564CTAsND
Zhao 202149F/17/47/ChineseLGM, bulbar and respiratory involvementp.R246X; p.T643PTAsND
Zhao 202150M/3/14/ChineseLGMp.G26S; p.V291INonspecific myopathiesND
Zhao 202151M/7/15/ChineseLGMp.H677YTAsND

Abbreviations:AAD, age at diagnosis; AAO, age at onset; AV, autophagic vacuoles; EP, endplate; F, female; homo, homozygous mutation; LGM, limb‐girdle muscle weakness; M, male; NA, not available; ND, not done; NMJ, neuromuscular junction; PMS, postsynaptic membrane simplification; PPM, poor postsynaptic membrane; RRF, ragged red fibre; RV, rimmed vacuoles; TAs, tubular aggregates.

The clinical and pathological summarization of GFPT1‐related CMS patients with muscle biopsy Abbreviations:AAD, age at diagnosis; AAO, age at onset; AV, autophagic vacuoles; EP, endplate; F, female; homo, homozygous mutation; LGM, limb‐girdle muscle weakness; M, male; NA, not available; ND, not done; NMJ, neuromuscular junction; PMS, postsynaptic membrane simplification; PPM, poor postsynaptic membrane; RRF, ragged red fibre; RV, rimmed vacuoles; TAs, tubular aggregates. Eighteen of 51 patients with muscle biopsy were also examined by electron microscopy. Nine patients showed tubular aggregates on muscle ultrastructure. Extensive autophagic vacuoles were found in two patients. Among the 18 patients, endplate analysis was performed in 12 patients, of which 11 patients revealed significantly reduced and poorly developed junctional fold membrane compared to the normal neuromuscular junction.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we described two patients with a clinical phenotype of CMS characterized by easy fatigability, progressive limb‐girdle muscle weakness, and response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy. Electrophysiological assessments revealed positive decrements of repetitive stimulations. Molecular findings indicated biallelic heterozygous mutations in the GFPT1 gene co‐segregating in the families. Therefore, the two patients were in agreement with the diagnosis of GFPT1‐related CMS (Guergueltcheva et al., 2012; Selcen et al., 2013). Most patients with GFPT1 mutations present in the first decade with weakness of the more proximal and less distal muscles, and absence of ocular, bulbar and respiratory weakness (Bauché et al., 2017; Guergueltcheva et al., 2012). Like the typical features, the two unrelated patients initially had pronounced fatigability at the early stage of disease, gradually showed limb‐girdle distribution of muscle weakness and decreased therapeutic effectiveness with the disease development. Clinical heterogeneities such as hypotonia, scoliosis, and psychomotor delay were also found in our patients, while no more extra‐muscular symptoms were observed. Accordingly, clinical physicians should carefully make differential diagnosis between the GFPT1‐related CMS and myasthenia gravis, metabolic myopathies, or limb‐girdle muscle dystrophy (Witherick & Brady, 2018). There is a lack of an inherent association between the severity of muscle weakness and the abnormal extent of muscle MRI. The finding of a relatively normal muscle MRI in a patient who showed marked weakness possibly suggested a disorder of neuromuscular junction (Finlayson et al., 2016). This study showed that muscle MRI of GFPT1‐related CMS had a tendency of selective distribution of mild fat infiltration characterized by diffusely involving in thigh muscles but sparing of adductor magnus and semimembranosus muscles, as well as diffusely involving in the leg muscles but sparing of medial gastrocnemius. Additionally, the mild hyperintensity in muscles without fat infiltration indicated increased water content. The detailed descriptions about lower limb muscle in patients with GFPT1‐related CMS were very rare. Accordingly, it was possible that some GFPT1‐related CMS patients might exhibit distinctive muscle MRI, and played an adjunctive role in the diagnosis of CMS, specifically in differentiating CMS from myopathic or dystrophic disorders and between CMS subtypes. Nevertheless, the observations of MRI were limited by a small number of patients, varied age of onset, and different duration of disease. Although about 70% of GFPT1‐related CMS patients showed tubular aggregates that were believed to represent aggregations of misfolded proteins (Schiaffino, 2012), our studies indicated that the pathological changes simultaneously had great diversities. The impairment of neuromuscular junction is a main target due to heavy glycosylation of many important proteins in the neuromuscular junction, while it is possible that GFPT1 defect could have additional direct pathological effects on extra‐synaptic regions (Hugo & Schlegel, 2017; Niimi et al., 2001). Muscle specimens of patients with hypoglycosylated myasthenia have shown prominent myopathic features including fiber‐type disproportion, degenerating mitochondria, and destruction of the muscle fiber organelles associated with autophagy (Bauché et al., 2017; Guergueltcheva et al., 2012; Helman et al., 2019; Huh et al., 2012; Luo et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2021; Maselli et al., 2014; Matsumoto et al., 2019; O'grady et al., 2016; Selcen et al., 2013; Senderek et al., 2011; Szelinger et al., 2020; Yiş et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2021). Zebrafish model with GFPT1 knock down also showed abnormalities of both muscle structure and neuromuscular junction (Hugo & Schlegel, 2017). Therefore, it is reasonable that some vacuolar or nonspecific myopathic changes could appear in CMS specimens attributed to GFPT1‐related hypoglycosylation of multiple muscle proteins. It was puzzling that GFPT1 defect in patient one was associated with atypical pathological changes of myofibrillar myopathy (MFM) characterized by desmin deposits, Z‐disc disorganization, and electronic dense granulofilamentous aggregation. More than 200 known glycosyltransferases are responsible for the glycosylation of thousands of proteins in muscle (Zoltowska et al., 2013), of which many MFM‐related proteins, such as desmin, plectin, myotilin, LDB3, and FLNC, should be glycosylated to accomplish physiological functions (Hong et al., 2011). Among these MFM‐related proteins, the plectin crosslinks intermediate filaments to their targets in different tissues, and has been associated with MFM, CMS, and limb‐girdle muscle dystrophy (Winter et al., 2014). In this sense, the underlying hypoglycosylation of plectin that will cause the dysfunction of the protein might be partly in charge of the MFM‐like pathological changes. The dysfunction of neuromuscular junction is the essence of CMS. The endplates morphology showed that the folds of postsynaptic membrane usually were reduced and simplified, but unspecific abnormalities and even normal endplates could also be observed in GFPT1‐related CMS (Zoltowska et al., 2013). Intriguingly, besides the poorly developed endplates, some ring‐like or block‐like materials with electronic dense were observed beneath endplates in our patient. These materials might originate from the disturbance of Z lines or myofibrillar structures. The pathological basis of endplate changes likely stems from hypoglycosylation and altered function of endplate‐specific glycoproteins, such as MUSK, agrin, and dystroglycans (Willems et al., 2016). In summary, besides the common tubular aggregates, the muscle pathological changes of GFPT1‐related CMS also can show rimmed vacuolar myopathy, autophagic vacuolar myopathy, mitochondria‐like myopathy, MFM‐like myopathy, neurogenic features, and unspecific myopathy changes. This extra‐synaptic pathology might be in part responsible for the permanent muscle weakness and resistance to acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy. To some extent, the pathological findings might be one of the predictors of the disease outcome.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kaiyan Jiang and Yilei Zheng contributed to analysis, interpretation and drafting. Jing Lin contributed to genetic analysis. Yanyan Yu, Xiaobing Li, Xiaorong Wu, and Xin Fang contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. Meihong Zhou performed the pathological study, Meihong Zhou performed the electrophysiological analysis. Daojun Hong contributed to the study design and revising the manuscript, as well as funding acquisition.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.2469 Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  36 in total

1.  Mutations in GFPT1-related congenital myasthenic syndromes are associated with synaptic morphological defects and underlie a tubular aggregate myopathy with synaptopathy.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bauché; Geoffroy Vellieux; Damien Sternberg; Marie-Joséphine Fontenille; Elodie De Bruyckere; Claire-Sophie Davoine; Guy Brochier; Julien Messéant; Lucie Wolf; Michel Fardeau; Emmanuelle Lacène; Norma Romero; Jeanine Koenig; Emmanuel Fournier; Daniel Hantaï; Nathalie Streichenberger; Veronique Manel; Arnaud Lacour; Aleksandra Nadaj-Pakleza; Sylvie Sukno; Françoise Bouhour; Pascal Laforêt; Bertrand Fontaine; Laure Strochlic; Bruno Eymard; Frédéric Chevessier; Tanya Stojkovic; Sophie Nicole
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Novel compound heterozygous variants in the GFPT1 gene leading to rare limb-girdle congenital myasthenic syndrome with rimmed vacuoles.

Authors:  Yanyan Ma; Ting Xiong; Guohua Lei; Jiaqi Ding; Rui Yang; Zunbo Li; Jun Guo; Dingguo Shen
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Tubular aggregates in skeletal muscle: just a special type of protein aggregates?

Authors:  Stefano Schiaffino
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 4.296

4.  Genetic Landscape of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes From Turkey: Novel Mutations and Clinical Insights.

Authors:  Uluç Yiş; Kerstin Becker; Semra Hız Kurul; Gökhan Uyanik; Erhan Bayram; Göknur Haliloğlu; Ayşe İpek Polat; Müge Ayanoğlu; Derya Okur; Ayşe Fahriye Tosun; Gül Serdaroğlu; Sanem Yilmaz; Haluk Topaloğlu; Banu Anlar; Sebahattin Cirak; Andrew G Engel
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 5.  Congenital myasthenic syndromes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Andrew G Engel; Xin-Ming Shen; Duygu Selcen; Steven M Sine
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 44.182

6.  Novel compound heterozygous GFPT1 mutations in a family with limb-girdle myasthenia with tubular aggregates.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Luo; Lu Zhao; Cheng-Yuan Mao; Zhi-Hua Yang; Jing Yang; Yan-Lin Wang; Hui-Xia Niu; Yu-Tao Liu; Chang-He Shi; Yu-Ming Xu
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.296

7.  Congenital myasthenic syndrome in Israel: Genetic and clinical characterization.

Authors:  Sharon Aharoni; Menachem Sadeh; Yehuda Shapira; Simon Edvardson; Muhannad Daana; Talia Dor-Wollman; Aviva Mimouni-Bloch; Ayelet Halevy; Rony Cohen; Liora Sagie; Zohar Argov; Malcolm Rabie; Ronen Spiegel; Ilana Chervinsky; Naama Orenstein; Andrew G Engel; Yoram Nevo
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.296

8.  Muscle magnetic resonance imaging in congenital myasthenic syndromes.

Authors:  Sarah Finlayson; Jasper M Morrow; Pedro M Rodriguez Cruz; Christopher D J Sinclair; Arne Fischmann; John S Thornton; Steve Knight; Ray Norbury; Mel White; Michal Al-Hajjar; Nicola Carboni; Sandeep Jayawant; Stephanie A Robb; Tarek A Yousry; David Beeson; Jacqueline Palace
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Molecular characterization of congenital myasthenic syndromes in Spain.

Authors:  D Natera-de Benito; A Töpf; J J Vilchez; L González-Quereda; J Domínguez-Carral; J Díaz-Manera; C Ortez; M Bestué; P Gallano; M Dusl; A Abicht; J S Müller; J Senderek; A García-Ribes; N Muelas; T Evangelista; Y Azuma; G McMacken; A Paipa Merchan; P M Rodríguez Cruz; A Camacho; E Jiménez; M C Miranda-Herrero; A Santana-Artiles; O García-Campos; R Dominguez-Rubio; M Olivé; J Colomer; D Beeson; H Lochmüller; A Nascimento
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.296

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diverse myopathological features in the congenital myasthenia syndrome with GFPT1 mutation.

Authors:  Kaiyan Jiang; Yilei Zheng; Jing Lin; Xiaorong Wu; Yanyan Yu; Min Zhu; Xin Fang; Meihong Zhou; Xiaobing Li; Daojun Hong
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.405

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.