| Literature DB >> 34977891 |
Chao Wang1, Ya-Jie Wang1, Chun-Lin He2, Qian-You Wang1, Shuang-Quan Zang1.
Abstract
Increasing research efforts have been focused on developing next-generation propellants. In this work, we demonstrated that assembling zero-dimensional (0D) silver clusters with energetic ligands into 3D metal organic frameworks (MOFs) not only inherited the short ignition delay (ID) time of the alkynyl-silver cluster but also significantly increased the output energy. Among them, the open cationic framework of ZZU-363 incorporating counter NO3 - ions achieved a considerably reduced energy barrier and eventually the shortest ID time (26 ms), together with the highest volumetric energy density (40.4 kJ cm-3) and specific impulse (263.1 s), which is far superior to traditional hydrazine-based propellants. The underlying mechanisms are clearly revealed by theoretical calculations. This work opens a venue to significantly enhancing the hypergolic activity of metal clusters and MOFs.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34977891 PMCID: PMC8715486 DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACS Au ISSN: 2691-3704
Scheme 1Conceptual Illustrations of 3D Metal Cluster Assembled Materials as Hypergolic Fuels Compared to That of a 0D Metal Cluster
Figure 1Structures of ZZU-361, ZZU-362, and ZZU-363. The Ag12 cluster core in ZZU-361, the Ag14 cluster core in ZZU-362, and the Ag1D chain in ZZU-363 are shown on the right. All hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity, and Ag, C, N, F, and O atoms are shown in green, gray, blue, cyan, and red, respectively.
Calculated Density (ρc), Combustion Enthalpy (ΔHc), Heat of Formation (ΔHf), Specific Energy (Eg), Energy Density (Ev), and Hypergolic Properties of the Explored Materials Compared to Those of Selected Fuels and Energetic Materials
| fuel | ρ | –Δ | Δ | ID/(ms) | flame duration (ms) | flame height | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.556 | 33799.2 | 12.3 | 31.4 | 3025.2 | 161.4 | 60 | 152 | 7 | |
| 2.269 | 47694.5 | 15.2 | 34.5 | 11835.6 | 219.6 | 59 | 113 | 7 | |
| 2.640 | 46893.9 | 15.3 | 40.4 | 22051.1 | 263.1 | 26 | 80 | >7 | |
| CBA-Ag[ | 1.424 | 72663.0 | 140 | ||||||
| Zn(VIM)2[ | 0.976 | 4789.9 | 19.0 | 18.9 | 29 | sparks | sparks | ||
| Zn(AIM)2[ | 0.996 | 4783.8 | 19.3 | 19.3 | 2 | >600 | 4 | ||
| BmimDCA[ | 1.061 | 6069.0 | 244.0 | 244.2 | 44 | ||||
| UDMH[ | 0.790 | 1980.1 | 48.3 | 239.0[ | 4.8[ |
Densities obtained from X-ray measurements (g cm–3).
Calculated combustion enthalpy (ΔHc) from their corresponding molecular weights.
Heat of formation.
Specific impulse (EXPLO5 v6.05.04).
Approximate values.
Figure 2Hypergolicity drop tests with WFNA for ZZU-361 (top), ZZU-362 (middle), and ZZU-363 (bottom).
Figure 3(a) Optimized configurations of intermediates. (b) Calculated free energy diagram of ZZU-361, ZZU-362, and ZZU-363 reacting with HNO3 molecule at 298 K.