Literature DB >> 34976148

Short vs. long intramedullary nail systems in trochanteric fractures: A randomized prospective single center study.

Șerban Dragosloveanu1,2, Christiana D M Dragosloveanu3, Dragoș C Cotor2, Cristian I Stoica1,2.   

Abstract

In unstable pertrochanteric fractures, there are still debates regarding the complications and long-term benefits after internal fixation using short or long cephalomedullary nails. Therefore, a study was developed regarding this idea. From May 2017 to April 2020, 61 patients with unstable (AO 31-A2) and intertrochanteric fractures (AO 31-A3) were surgically operated on. During follow-up, 8 patients were excluded (lost or deceased). A total of 26 patients received internal short nail system fixation and 27 received a long nail system. All cases followed the standard 6-week rehabilitation protocol. Follow-up was at 3, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, and clinical and functional assessment were determined by a different surgeon using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC). A total of 42 (79.2%) had a 31.A2 fracture (21 in the long nail group and 21 in the short nail group) and 11 (20.8%) had a 31.A3 fracture (6 in long nail group and 5 in the short nail group). Surgical time was significantly longer (P<0.05) in the long nail group (an average of 81.38±12.01 min), compared with the short nail group (53.11±8.36 min). Blood loss was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the long nail group (210±12.1 ml) compared to the short nail group (75.4±14.8 ml). No statistical differences were noted regarding tip-apex distance (TAD) and VAS score. At 6 months, HHS was better for the short nail group (84.76±3.68) (P<0.05). Regarding the FAC scale, no significant statistical differences were identified. Cut-out occurred in 2 cases in the short nail group and 1 case from the long nail group. Only 1 peri-implant fracture occurred in a patient with a long cephalomedullary nail. In conclusion, the long cephalomedullary nail requires a longer surgical time and is associated with an increase in intraoperative blood loss without improving the functional outcome after 12 months postoperatively. A larger sample of cases is required to thoroughly analyze the postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hip; implant choice; long intramedullary nail systems; short intramedullary nail systems; trochanteric fractures

Year:  2021        PMID: 34976148      PMCID: PMC8674970          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.11029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  34 in total

1.  Is the rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Samuel Bachmeier; Lukas Prantl; Michael Nerlich; Jochen Hammer; Edgar Mayr; Amir Andreas Al-Munajjed; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Use of the gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. 1998.

Authors:  José A Valverde; Manuel G Alonso; Jaime G Porro; Domingo Rueda; Pedro M Larrauri; Juan J Soler
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  No rest for the wounded: early ambulation after hip surgery accelerates recovery.

Authors:  Leonie B Oldmeadow; Elton R Edwards; Lara A Kimmel; Eva Kipen; Val J Robertson; Michael J Bailey
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Early complications associated with cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Orry Erez; Paul J Dougherty
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 5.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; H Sievänen; A Heinonen; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Long and short intramedullary nails for fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1, A2 and A3): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Zhang; S Zhang; S Wang; H Zhang; W Zhang; P Liu; J Ma; N Pervaiz; J Wang
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 7.  Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies.

Authors:  Dean G Lorich; David S Geller; Jason H Nielson
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

8.  Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Authors:  Conor Kleweno; Jordan Morgan; James Redshaw; Mitchel Harris; Edward Rodriguez; David Zurakowski; Mark Vrahas; Paul Appleton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Ryan G Miyamoto; Kevin M Kaplan; Brett R Levine; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.