| Literature DB >> 34975758 |
Sofie Ahlin1,2, Consuelo Cefalo2, Isabel Bondia-Pons3, Kajetan Trošt3, Esmeralda Capristo2, Luca Marini2, Montserrat Romero4,5,6, Antonio Zorzano4,5,6, Amalia Gastaldelli7, Geltrude Mingrone2,8, John J Nolan3,9.
Abstract
Aims: To test the hypothesis that adipose tissue gene expression patterns would be affected by metabolic surgery and we aimed to identify genes and metabolic pathways as well as metabolites correlating with metabolic changes following metabolic surgery. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; branched chain amino acids (BCAA); metabolic pathway; metabolic surgery; metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975758 PMCID: PMC8716486 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.786952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Participants’ characteristics at study start and at follow-up visit.
| ALL | BPD | RYGB | % differences | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At study start | At follow-up | At study start | At follow-up | At study start | At follow-up | ALL | BPD | RYGB | |
| Number | 15 | 15 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 15 | 9 | 6 |
| Days until follow-up | 185.3 ± 72.9 | 183.7 ± 61.8 | 187.8 ± 93.6 | ||||||
| Men, n (%) | 10 (66.7) | – | 4 (44.4) * | – | 6 (100) * | – | – | – | – |
| Age, years | 44.3 ± 8.3 | – | 44.7 ± 8.1 | – | 43.7 ± 9.4 | – | – | – | – |
| Weight, kg | 151.0 ± 24.8 ### | 110.4 ± 22.2 ### | 156.3 ± 28.7 ### | 109.4 ± 26.8 ### | 143.0 ± 16.7 ## | 112.0 ± 15.1 ## | -26.5 ± 10.8 | -29.8 ± 12.0 | 21.6 ± 7.0 |
| % Excess weight loss | – | 53.3 ± 19.9 | – | 55.5 ± 20.9 | – | 50.0 ± 19.7 | – | – | – |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 51.7 ± 9.7 ### | 37.7 ± 7.7 ### | 55.9 ± 9.7 * ### | 39.1 ± 8.9 ### | 45.3 ± 5.7 * ## | 35.5 ± 5.5 ## | -26.1 ± 11.4 | -29.2 ± 13.0 | -21.6 ± 7.0 |
| Change in BMI | – | -14.0 ± 7.2 | – | -16.9 ± 7.9 * | – | -9.7 ± 3.1 * | – | – | – |
| Glucose, mg/dl | 97.5 ± 17.0 ### | 76.8 ± 11.1 ### | 101.7 ± 20.7 # | 76.7 ± 13.8 # | 91.3 ± 6.3 | 77.0 ± 6.3 ## | -19.8 ± 13.9 | -22.6 ± 17.1 | -15.6 ± 6.3 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dl | 189.6 ± 28.2 ### | 138.1 ± 28.6 ### | 197.0 ± 31.3 ### | 124.7 ± 17.3 * ### | 178.5 ± 20.2 | 158.2 ± 31.2 * | -25.0 ± 22.1 | -35.2 ± 13.7 * | -9.8 ± 24.7 * |
| HDL-cholesterol, mg/dl | 47.1 ± 9.5 | 41.7 ± 12.3 | 47.9 ± 7.9 | 38.9 ± 13.2 | 46.0 ± 12.4 | 45.5 ± 11.0 | -8.0 ± 38.5 | -14.0 ± 42.1 | 0.5 ± 35.5 |
| LDL-cholesterol, mg/dl | 119.5 ± 22.1 ## | 74.9 ± 27.5 ## | 127.9 ± 16.3 ## | 61.6 ± 14.2 * ## | 107.8 ± 25.6 | 92.7 ± 32.0 * | -37.8 ± 23.9 | -50.0 ± 15.2 * | -20.8 ± 24.4 * |
| Triglycerides, mg/dl | 134.9 ± 58.5 | 109.6 ± 49.3 | 141.4 ± 52.7 | 116.2 ± 61.1 | 126.3 ± 69.7 | 99.7 ± 25.2 | -8.7 ± 46.2 | -16.4 ± 19.6 | 1.7 ± 69.2 |
| Type 2 diabetes | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | – | – | – |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 41.4 ± 3.7 ### | 36.5 ± 2.6 ### | 42.1 ± 4.0 # | 37.3 ± 2.5 # | 40.3 ± 3.3 ## | 35.3 ± 2.3 ## | -11.3 ± 8.1 | -10.7 ± 9.8 | -12.2 ± 5.3 |
| Whole body glucose uptake, M, mg/kg/min | 2.7 ± 1.4 ### | 6.0 ± 2.2 ### | 2.3 ± 1.2 ### | 6.1 ± 2.3 ### | 3.3 ± 1.7 # | 5.7 ± 2.3 # | 151.0 ± 116.5 | 188.2 ± 119.4 | 95.2 ± 94.6 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.3 ± 2.2 ## | 1.1 ± 0.6 ## | 3.0 ± 2.2 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 3.6 ± 2.3 # | 0.9 ± 0.5 # | -42.7 ± 62.4 | -25.4 ± 74.7 | -68.6 ± 25.5 |
| Insulin secretion, pmol/min/m2 | 223.4 ± 100.7 | 196.6 ± 140.0 | 226.2 ± 89.9 | 173.9 ± 98.0 | 219.2 ± 124.2 | 230.6 ± 192.9 | -14.3 ± 37.1 | -20.4 ± 37.6 | -5.1 ± 37.8 |
Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation or numbers and percent. * = p-values < 0.05 in comparisons between the BPD group and the RYGB group at study start and follow-up.# = p-values < 0.05, ## = p-values < 0.01 and ### = p-values < 0.001 in comparisons at study start and at follow-up in each study group. BMI, Body Mass Index; HDL-cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance.
Small polar metabolites with signficant change between study start and follow-up in the total surgery group (n = 15).
| Metabolite (relative concentration) | At study start | At follow-up | p-value | q-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID no. 400 | 6.45 ± 1.56 | 39.89 ± 37.04 | 0.00012 | 0.026 |
| 3-indoleacetic acid | 57.34 ± 53.48 | 309.37 ± 362.84 | 0.00016 | 0.018 |
| ID no. 493 | 9.31 ± 4.88 | 17.71 ± 5.79 | 0.00018 | 0.013 |
| ID no. 361 | 7.21 ± 3.63 | 37.23 ± 35.10 | 0.00022 | 0.012 |
| ID no. 294 | 565.07 ± 194.45 | 349.27 ± 194.06 | 0.00030 | 0.013 |
| 2-hydroxybutyric acid | 399.49 ± 209.60 | 164.03 ± 85.83 | 0.00039 | 0.014 |
| Valine | 574.80 ± 131.67 | 395.01 ± 109.86 | 0.00075 | 0.023 |
| ID no. 296 | 182.64 ± 66.16 | 343.78 ± 144.47 | 0.0012 | 0.033 |
| ID no. 580 | 13.90 ± 9.77 | 32.91 ± 17.23 | 0.0016 | 0.039 |
| Glutamic acid | 244.25 ± 85.84 | 141.77 ± 80.66 | 0.0017 | 0.037 |
| 4 hydroxybenzeneacetic acid | 22.83 ± 31.43 | 152.01 ± 164.83 | 0.0017 | 0.034 |
| Alpha tocopherol | 28.75 ± 9.11 | 19.62 ± 8.40 | 0.0019 | 0.036 |
The data are presented as mean relative concentration ± standard deviation. Paired T-test on log2-transformed values was used to analyse differences in metabolite levels at study start and follow-up. False discovery rate was used to adjust for multiple testing.
Changes in GSG index, branched chain amino acids, aromatic amino acids and saturated fatty acids after metabolic surgery.
| ALL | BPD | RYGB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At study start | At follow-up | At study start | At follow-up | At study start | At follow-up | |
| GSG-index | 0.69 ± 0.26 ### | 0.31 ± 0.20 ### | 0.66 ± 0.25 # | 0.34 ± 0.23 # | 0.73 ± 0.29 # | 0.28 ± 0.14 # |
| Branched chain amino acids | 1243.65 ± 341.90 ## | 888.37 ± 283.09 ## | 1129.64 ± 199.39 | 981.62 ± 285.96 | 1414.67 ± 453.01 ### | 748.50 ± 233.30 ### |
| Aromatic amino acids | 415.81 ± 98.78 | 345.50 ± 117.68 | 397.24 ± 107.24 | 405.40 ± 80.22 ** | 443.67 ± 85.85 # | 255.65 ± 111.07 ** # |
| Saturated fatty acids | 5007.40 ± 866.23 | 4501.13 ± 1374.79 | 5282.23 ± 752.38 | 4882.31 ± 1359.03 | 4595.15 ± 924.87 | 3929.37 ± 1297.38 |
** = p-values < 0.01 in comparisons between the BPD group and the RYGB group at study start and follow-up. # = p-values < 0.05, ## = p-values < 0.01 and ### = p-values < 0.001 in comparisons study start vs follow-up in each study group.
Figure 1Correlations between changes in metabolic parameters [log2 (post/pre)] and changes in metabolites [log2 (post/pre)] in Spearman correlation analyses. Blue color indicates a significant negative correlation coefficient and red color a significant positive correlation coefficient. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; M, whole body glucose uptake; OGIS, oral glucose insulin sensitivity; HDL-cholesterol, High density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; BCAA, branched chain amino acids. ns, not significant.
Figure 2Changes in the entire cohort in relative gene expression of adipose tissue genes involved in (A) branched chain amino acid metabolism (B) fatty acid metabolism (C) amino acid metabolism. *p-value < 0.05. **p-value < 0.01.