| Literature DB >> 34975519 |
Chun-Shui Pan1,2,3,4, Li Yan1,2,3,4, Se-Qi Lin5, Ke He1,2,3,4, Yuan-Chen Cui1,2,3,4, Yu-Ying Liu1,2,3,4, Bai-He Hu1,2,3,4, Xin Chang1,2,3,4, Xin-Rong Zhao1,2,3,4, Jing-Yu Fan1,2,4, Jing-Yan Han1,2,3,4,6.
Abstract
Aims: Coronary microvascular hyperpermeability is an important contributor to ischemia or reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, the effective strategy for this insult remains limited. This study aimed to explore the protective effect of the compound Chinese medicine QiShenYiQi Pills (QSYQ) against coronary microvascular hyperpermeability after cardiac I/R with focusing on the underlying mechanism. Methods andEntities:
Keywords: QSYQ; cardiac microvascular hyperpermeability; cell-cell junctions; cytoskeleton; endothelial damage
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975519 PMCID: PMC8718710 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.753761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Effect of pretreatment with QSYQ on the vascular corrosion casts and coronary venular albumin leakage of rat heart. (A) The representative scanning electron micrographs of myocardial vascular corrosion casts in different groups. Arrows: distorted and narrowed vessel segments. a1: NS + Sham group; a2: QSYQ + Sham group; a3: NS+I/R group; a4: QSYQ+I/R group. Bar = 50 μ m. (B) Representative images of FITC-albumin leakage from coronary venules in different groups. b1: NS + Sham group; b2: QSYQ + Sham group; b3: NS+I/R group; b4: QSYQ+I/R group. Bar = 50 μ m. (C) Statistical results of albumin leakage expressed as ratio of fluorescence intensity in the Ip to that Iv. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + Sham group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + I/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
Figure 2Effect of pretreatment with QSYQ on cardiac microstructure in rats and viability and endothelial barrier integrity of HCMECs. (A) Representative electron micrographs of cardiac vascular endothelium in different groups. a1: NS + Sham group; a2: QSYQ + Sham group; a3: NS+I/R group; a4: QSYQ+I/R group. Arrow: intercellular gap. Bar = 0.5 μ m. (B) Viability of HCMECs challenged by H/R with or without various dosages of QSYQ. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls test. (C) Effect of QSYQ on hyperpermeability of HCMEC monolayer challenged by H/R. The permeability was expressed as the optical density at 492 nm of FITC-dextran in the lower chamber. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + Sham group or control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + I/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
Figure 3Effect of QSYQ pretreatment on intercellular junction proteins and Src/caveolin-1 in HCMECs after H/R. (A) Representative western blot bands of Src, p-Src, caveolin-1, and p-caveolin-1 in various groups of HCMECs. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (B) Relative densitometric values of p-Src, caveolin-1, and p-caveolin-1 corrected for GAPDH. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + H/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons. (C) Representative immunofluorescence confocal images of claudin-5 in rat heart vessels. Arrows: discontinuous distribution of claudin-5. c1: NS + Sham group; c2: QSYQ + Sham group; c3: NS+I/R group; c4: QSYQ+I/R group. Claudin-5 (red) localized between the endothelial cells with marker vWF (green). Bar = 7.5 μm. (D,E) Representative western blot bands (D) and relative densitometric values (E) of claudin-5, ZO-1, occludin, and VE-cadherin in HCMECs in different groups. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + H/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
Figure 4Effect of pretreatment with QSYQ on cytoskeleton, ATP/AMP content, the expression of YME1L1 and NUDFA12 and complex I activity after H/R. (A) The F-actin cytoskeleton in HCMECs (red). Arrow: F-actin cytoskeleton that is concentrated at the periphery of cell and disintegrated. Bar = 10 μm. a1: NS + Sham group; a2: QSYQ + Sham group; a3: NS + H/R group; a4: QSYQ + H/R group. (B) Quantitative measurement of ATP and AMP by ELISA in HCMECs. (C) Quantitative measurement of complex I activity by ELISA in HCMECs. (D) Representative western blot bands and relative densitometric values of YME1L1 and NUDFA12 in HCMECs in different groups. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + H/R group. (E) Quantitative measurement of YEM1L1 activity by ELISA in HCMECs. Values are means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + H/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
Figure 5Effect of QSYQ on the activity of ATP synthase and the expression of RhoA, ROCK, and p-MLC in HCMECs after H/R. (A) Quantitative measurement of complex I activity by ELISA in HCMECs. (B) Representative western blot bands of ATP5D, RhoA, ROCK, MLC, and p-MLC in HCMECs. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) Relative densitometric values of ATP5D, RhoA, ROCK, and p-MLC corrected for GAPDH. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + H/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
Figure 6Effect of pretreatment with QSYQ on maintaining the vascular BM integrity and related proteins. (A) Collagen was stained by Sirius Red in different groups to show the collagen deposition in cardiac microvascular BM of rat. Arrows: decreased area of collagen deposition in BM. a1: NS + Sham group; a2: QSYQ + Sham group; a3: NS + I/R group; a4: QSYQ + I/R group. Bar = 50 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence confocal images of collage-IV (red) in coronary venules of rat in each group. Arrows: discontinuous distribution of collagen IV. b1: NS + Sham group; b2: QSYQ + Sham group; b3: NS + I/R group; b4: QSYQ + I/R group. Bars = 50 μm. (C,D) Representative western blot bands (C) and relative densitometric values (D) of MMP-2, MMP-9, and CTSS in HCMECs in different groups. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (E) The activity of MMP-2, MMP-9, and CTSS tested by ELISA in different groups of HCMECs. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + H/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni for multiple comparisons.
Figure 7Effect of PP2 on the expression of claudin-5 and p-caveolin-1, the activity of MMP-9 and CTSS, and hyperpermeability of HCMECs monolayer exposed to H/R. (A) Representative western blot bands (A) and relative densitometric values (B) of p-caveolin-1 and claudin-5 in HCMECs in different groups. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) Quantitative measurement of MMP-9 and CTSS activity by ELISA in HCMECs. (D) Effect of QSYQ on hyperpermeability of HCMEC monolayer induced by H/R. The permeability was expressed as the optical density of FITC-dextran at 492 nm in the lower chamber. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 vs. NS + Sham group or control group, #p < 0.05 vs. NS + I/R group. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls test.