| Literature DB >> 34975245 |
Jaideep Malhotra1, Keshav Malhotra2, Pankaj Talwar3, Priya Kannan4, Prabhakar Singh5, Yogesh Kumar6, Nishad Chimote7, Charudutt Joshi8, Sachin Bawle9, R B Agarwal10, Saroj Agarwal11, Ved Prakash12, Pooja Awasthi13, Sanjay Shukla14, Ram Prakash15, Satish Kumar Adiga16.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: What are the Safe and Ethical practices for ART applicable in INDIA? WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: The Indian IVF industry is booming; with mushrooming of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics in the country, the need for regulation is immense. The ISAR has taken up this initiative to lead the way forward in establishing practice guidelines for the safe and ethical use of ARTs in our country. These guidelines discuss the points to consider before the starting of an IVF unit, to the designing of the laboratory, the staffing pattern and experience recommendations, laboratory safety guidelines, documentation and patient traceability, gamete traceability, handling biological material, the consumables and media, and different consents and checklists and also propose key performance indicators for the Indian scenario. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting where two moderators were assigned to a group of experts to collate information on safe and ethical ivf practices in INDIA. This meeting utilised surveys, available scientific evidence and personal laboratory experience into various presentations by experts on pre-decided specific topics. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTINGEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975245 PMCID: PMC8656314 DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.330504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Reprod Sci ISSN: 1998-4766
Proposed training plan for new staff members in the in vitro fertilization laboratory
| Procedure | Observation and experienced staff member (cases) | Performed under supervisions (cases) | Allowances for working independently (cases) | May instruct beginners, after (cases) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semen analysis | 15 | 35 | 50 | 200 |
| Semen preparation | 15 | 35 | 50 | 200 |
| Preparation of culture material | 20 | 30 | 50 | 200 |
| Oocyte retrieval | 30 | 50 | 80 | 200 |
| Preparation of culture material | 15 | 35 | 50 | 200 |
| Embryo development | 15 | 35 | 50 | 200 |
| Embryo transfer | 30 | 50 | 80 | 200 |
| Cryopreservation and thawing of sperm | 15 | 35 | 50 | 200 |
| IVF | 30 | 50 | 80 | 200 |
| ICSI | 30 | 50 | 80 | 200 |
| Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryo | 30 | 50 | 80 | 200 |
IVF=In vitro fertilization, ICSI=Intracytoplasmic sperm injections
Predicted risks and mitigation strategies
| Risk | Mitigation strategy |
| Loss of power | Generator/UPS |
| CO2/special gas mix failure | Automatic gas changeover manifold; regulators |
| Liquid nitrogen storage tank emptying | Liquid nitrogen level alarms |
| Regular measuring/top-up of tanks. Replacement at end of life span. Safety training is a must | |
| Staff member injured | Low oxygen level and high CO2 alarms PPE |
| Fire alarms/extinguishers | |
| Break into laboratory | Security monitoring; security response; locks on liquid nitrogen tanks |
| Equipment failure | Alarm system; spare equipment; service/maintenance contracts; arrangements with competitors |
| IT virus/hacking – loss of data | Regular backups (stored offsite); antivirus software |
PPE=Personal protective equipment, UPS=Uninterruptible power supply
Recommendations on staffing
| Number of laboratory cycles performed annually | Minimum number of embryologists |
|---|---|
| 1–150 | 2 |
| 151–300 | 3 |
| 301–600 | 4 |
| >600 | 4+1 additional embryologist per additional 200 cycles |
Distribution of in vitro fertilization centers according to the number of cycles
| Cycles | Number of centers | 2011 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| <50 | 78 | 84 | 96 |
| 51–100 | 16 | 15 | 17 |
| 101–200 | 9 | 13 | 16 |
| 201–500 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
| 501–1000 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| >1000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 114 | 123 | 139 |
The categorization of in vitro fertilization clinics
| Level 1 (primary infertility care units) | In this type of clinics, preliminary investigations are carried out and type and cause of infertility are diagnosed |
| Primary infertility care unit or clinic could be a doctor’s consulting room, such as a gynecologist’s or a physician’s consulting office, or even a general hospital | |
| Depending on the severity of infertility, the couple could be treated at the Level 1A clinic or referred to a specialty (Level 1B, Level 2 or Level 3) clinic | |
| The gynecologist or the physician in-charge of a Level 1A infertility care unit should have an appropriate postgraduate degree or diploma and be capable of taking care of the above responsibility | |
| A Level 1A infertility care unit will not require an accreditation under these guidelines | |
| Level 2 (secondary infertility care units) | In this type of clinics, preliminary investigations are carried out and type and cause of infertility are diagnosed |
| Primary infertility care unit or clinic could be a doctor’s consulting room, such as a gynecologist’s or a physician’s consulting office, or even a general hospital | |
| Depending on the severity of infertility, the couple could be treated at the Level 1A clinic or referred to a specialty (Level 1B, Level 2, or Level 3) clinic | |
| The gynecologist or the physician in charge of a Level 1A infertility care unit should have an appropriate postgraduate degree or diploma and be capable of taking care of the above responsibility | |
| A Level 1A infertility care unit will not require an accreditation under these guidelines | |
| Level 3 (tertiary level infertility care units) | In this type of clinics, preliminary investigations are carried out and type and cause of infertility are diagnosed |
| Primary infertility care unit or clinic could be a doctor’s consulting room, such as a gynecologist’s or a physician’s consulting office, or even a general hospital | |
| Depending on the severity of infertility, the couple could be treated at the Level 1A clinic or referred to a specialty (Level 1B, Level 2, or Level 3) clinic | |
| The gynecologist or the physician in-charge of a Level 1A infertility care unit should have an appropriate postgraduate degree or diploma and be capable of taking care of the above responsibility | |
| A Level 1A infertility care unit will not require an accreditation under these guidelines |
| Parameters | Group consensus (as per the ESHRE guidelines, 2015) |
|---|---|
| Particle counts | Grade A environment with a background of at least |
| Microbial contamination | GMP Grade D |
| VOCs filtration |
VOC=Volatile organic compounds, GMP=Good manufacturing practices
| Clinical | Administrative | Laboratory |
|---|---|---|
| OHSS | Most incidents relating to a breach of patient confidentiality involved information being posted to an incorrect address | Equipment-related |
| Patients are starting a treatment cycle before all their screening results were returned and reviewed | Power failures | |
| Equipment being moved or disconnected during the general laboratory cleaning | ||
| Examples | ||
| Clinical consultation reviews | ||
| Screening results not being checked or being misinterpreted | Letters to referring physicians | Pipes/tubes supplying essential gases to incubators to maintain the quality of embryos becoming distorted, leading to the quality of embryos being comprised |
| Consent forms | ||
| Donors being accepted and matched with a recipient without the screening results being available or checked, or screening results being misinterpreted. | Invoices for treatment and or storage fees blood results | Faulty transport incubators |
| Scan findings and complete sets of medical records | Process related | |
| Failure to carry out specific witnessing steps. Where cryopreserved material is moved from one location to another without the movement being witnessed, or without the logs documenting the storage location being updated. | ||
| Misplacement of an embryo during embryo transfer, ovarian abscesses following egg collection, vaginal bleeding and urinary tract infections as well as allergic reactions to medications. | Failure to follow protocols for freezing. | |
| Operator related | ||
| Dishes containing eggs or embryos that were knocked or dropped. | ||
| Infections found in embryo cultures that originated from the patient or their partner. | Pipettes that were accidently knocked whilst moving eggs or embryos (causing damage or loss of samples). | |
| Failure to operate equipment properly. | ||
| Turning off a piece of equipment mid-cycle. |
OHSS=Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Risk grading matrix15
| Level | Descriptor | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Almost certain | Likely to occur on many occasions |
| 4 | Likely | Probable but not persistent |
| 3 | Possible | May occur occasionally |
| 2 | Unlikely | Not expected to happen but possible |
| 1 | Rare | Difficult to believe it could happen again |
Recommendation on a collection of data
| Input quality | Process quality | Output quality |
|---|---|---|
| Indication, age, protocol start and total follicle-stimulating hormone dose | Oocyte damage rate after ICSI | Rates of positive b-hCG test |
| Fertilization rate and failed fertilization rate | Implantation and delivery rate | |
| Freeze-all rate | ||
| Numbers of follicles, eggs | Embryo cleavage rate | Serious adverse event rate |
| Percent immature, percent degenerated and the cycle cancellation rate | Embryo utilization and embryo cryo survival rate | |
| Average cell numbers on day 2 or day 3 |
ICSI=Intracytoplasmic sperm injections, b-hCG=b-human chorionic gonadotropin
Reference indicators for identifying the performance of the assisted reproductive technology laboratory
| RI | Calculation | Benchmark value |
|---|---|---|
| The proportion of oocytes recovered (stimulated cycles) | Number of oocytes retrieved/number of follicles on day of trigger ×100 | 80%–95% of follicles measured |
| The proportion of MII oocytes at ICSI | Number of MII oocytes at ICSI/number of COCs retrieved ×100 | 75%–90% |
MII=Metaphase II, RI=Reference indicators, COC=Cumulus oocyte complex, ICSI=Intracytoplasmic sperm injections
Proposed key performance indicators values
| KPI | Expected value (%) | Target value (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Day 3 embryo development rate | 70 | >90 |
| Blastocyst development rate | >40 | >60 |
| Successful biopsy rate | >90 | >99 |
| Implantation rate (cleavage-stage) | >25 | >35 |
| Implantation rate (blastocyst-stage) | >35 | >60 |
| Blastocyst cryo survival rate | >90 | >99 |
| ICSI damage rate | <10 | <5 |
| ICSI normal fertility rate | >65 | >80 |
| Failed fertility rate (IVF) | <5 | <5 |
| Cleavage rate | >95 | >99 |
| Day 2 embryo development rate | >70 | >80 |
| Sperm motility postpreparation for IVF | 90 | 95 |
KPI=Key performance indicators, ICSI=Intracytoplasmic sperm injections, IVF=In vitro fertilization