Literature DB >> 26908842

Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015).

Maria José De los Santos1, Susanna Apter2, Giovanni Coticchio3, Sophie Debrock4, Kersti Lundin5, Carlos E Plancha6, Fernando Prados7, Laura Rienzi8, Greta Verheyen9, Bryan Woodward10, Nathalie Vermeulen11.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Which recommendations can be provided by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Special Interest Group (ESHRE SIG) Embryology to support laboratory specialists in the organization and management of IVF laboratories and the optimization of IVF patient care? SUMMARY ANSWER: Structured in 13 sections, the guideline development group formulated recommendations for good practice in the organization and management of IVF laboratories, and for good practice of the specific procedures performed within the IVF laboratory. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: NA. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The guideline was produced by a group of 10 embryologists representing different European countries, settings and levels of expertise. The group evaluated the document of 2008, and based on this assessment, each group member rewrote one or more sections. Two 2-day meetings were organized during which each of the recommendations was discussed and rewritten until consensus within the guideline group was reached. After finalizing the draft, the members of the ESHRE SIG embryology were invited to review the guideline. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: NA. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The guideline provides recommendations on the general organization of an IVF laboratory (staffing and direction, quality management, laboratory safety), and on the specific aspects of the procedures performed in IVF laboratories (Identification of patients and traceability of their reproductive cells, consumables, handling of biological material, oocyte retrieval, sperm preparation, insemination of oocytes, scoring for fertilization, embryo culture and transfer, and cryopreservation). A last section provides recommendations regarding an Emergency plan for IVF laboratories. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Evidence on most of the issues described is scarce, and therefore it was decided not to perform a formal search for and assessment of scientific evidence. However, recommendations published in the EUTCD and relevant and recent documents, manuals and consensus papers were taken into account when formulating the recommendations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Despite the limitations, the guideline group is confident that this document will be helpful to directors and managers involved in the management and organization of IVF laboratories, but also to embryologists and laboratory technicians performing daily tasks. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The guideline was developed and funded by ESHRE, covering expenses associated with the guideline meetings. The guideline group members did not receive payment. Dr Coticchio reports speaker's fees from IBSA and Cook, outside the submitted work; Dr Lundin reports grants from Vitrolife, personal fees from Merck Serono, non-financial support from Unisense, outside the submitted work; Dr. Rienzi reports personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from MSD, grants from GFI, outside the submitted work; the other authors had nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESHRE; Embryology; IVF guidelines; good practice; laboratory; special interest group

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26908842     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  40 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic Systems for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Advantages and Potential Applications.

Authors:  Russel C Sequeira; Tracy Criswell; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.169

2.  Low versus high volume of culture medium during embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  George Α Sigalos; Yannis Michalopoulos; Athanasios G Kastoras; Olga Triantafyllidou; Nikos F Vlahos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Protecting fertility clinics against sperm-related fraud: a call to action.

Authors:  Kristy Cho; Jacob Ruiter; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Temperature of embryo culture for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Nora A Baak; Astrid Ep Cantineau; Cindy Farquhar; Daniel R Brison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-17

5.  When embryology meets genetics: the definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryos (DIPE)-the consensus of two Italian scientific societies.

Authors:  Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Catello Scarica; Laura Sosa Fernandez; Laura Rienzi; Rosanna Ciriminna; Maria Giulia Minasi; Antonio Novelli; Lucia De Santis; Daniela Zuccarello
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) as a clinical internal quality control to prevent ovarian hyperstimualtion syndrome.

Authors:  Joao Batista A Oliveira; Jose G Franco
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-08-01

8.  Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: Conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse.

Authors:  Luis Martínez-Granados; María Serrano; Antonio González-Utor; Nereyda Ortíz; Vicente Badajoz; Enrique Olaya; Nicolás Prados; Montse Boada; Jose A Castilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Maribor consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of performance indicators for clinical practice in ART.

Authors:  Veljko Vlaisavljevic; Susanna Apter; Antonio Capalbo; Arianna D'Angelo; Luca Gianaroli; Georg Griesinger; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; George Lainas; Tonko Mardesic; Tatjana Motrenko; Sari Pelkonen; Daniela Romualdi; Nathalie Vermeulen; Kelly Tilleman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-07-03

10.  Comparison of electronic versus manual witnessing of procedures within the in vitro fertilization laboratory: impact on timing and efficiency.

Authors:  Rebecca Holmes; Kelly Athayde Wirka; Allison Baxter Catherino; Brooke Hayward; Jason E Swain
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.