BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid tests (NATs) have potential to diagnose acute HIV infection and monitor persons taking pre-exposure prophylaxis or antiretroviral therapy (ART). POC NATs have not yet been evaluated in the US. METHODS: From June 2018-March 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the Simple Amplification-Based Assay version II (SAMBA II) POC NAT. People with HIV (PWH) and persons testing for HIV were tested with the SAMBA II qualitative (Qual) whole blood (WB) test. From April-September 2019, the Qual test was used on persons who were ART-naive, and SAMBA II Semi-quantitative (Semi-Q) WB was used with ART-experienced PWH. Both were performed on unprocessed venipuncture (VP) and, when indicated by protocol, fingerstick (FS) WB and plasma. SAMBA results were compared with Abbott RealTime HIV-1 polymerase chain reaction results on plasma. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and concordance between tests. RESULTS: SAMBA was used in 330 visits among 280 participants: 202 (61.2%) visits from PWH, and 128 (38.8%) from HIV-negative persons. Qual test sensitivity with ART-naive participants was 91.4% [32/35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 77.6% to 97.0%] using VP WB and 100% (27/27, 95% CI: 87.5% to 100%) using FS WB. Specificity was 100% using both specimen types. Concordance between the gold standard and Semi-Q at 1000 copies/mL among PWH on ART was 97.7% (86/88, 95% CI: 92.1% to 99.4%) and 100% (30/30, 95% CI: 88.7% to 100%) using VP and FS WB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SAMBA II POC NATs showed high sensitivity, specificity, and concordance with the gold standard assay, indicating its potential use in diagnostics and monitoring. Future work will evaluate POC NAT implementation in the US.
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid tests (NATs) have potential to diagnose acute HIV infection and monitor persons taking pre-exposure prophylaxis or antiretroviral therapy (ART). POC NATs have not yet been evaluated in the US. METHODS: From June 2018-March 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the Simple Amplification-Based Assay version II (SAMBA II) POC NAT. People with HIV (PWH) and persons testing for HIV were tested with the SAMBA II qualitative (Qual) whole blood (WB) test. From April-September 2019, the Qual test was used on persons who were ART-naive, and SAMBA II Semi-quantitative (Semi-Q) WB was used with ART-experienced PWH. Both were performed on unprocessed venipuncture (VP) and, when indicated by protocol, fingerstick (FS) WB and plasma. SAMBA results were compared with Abbott RealTime HIV-1 polymerase chain reaction results on plasma. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and concordance between tests. RESULTS: SAMBA was used in 330 visits among 280 participants: 202 (61.2%) visits from PWH, and 128 (38.8%) from HIV-negative persons. Qual test sensitivity with ART-naive participants was 91.4% [32/35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 77.6% to 97.0%] using VP WB and 100% (27/27, 95% CI: 87.5% to 100%) using FS WB. Specificity was 100% using both specimen types. Concordance between the gold standard and Semi-Q at 1000 copies/mL among PWH on ART was 97.7% (86/88, 95% CI: 92.1% to 99.4%) and 100% (30/30, 95% CI: 88.7% to 100%) using VP and FS WB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SAMBA II POC NATs showed high sensitivity, specificity, and concordance with the gold standard assay, indicating its potential use in diagnostics and monitoring. Future work will evaluate POC NAT implementation in the US.
Authors: Hendrik Streeck; Heiko Jessen; Galit Alter; Nickolas Teigen; Mike T Waring; Arne Jessen; Ingrid Stahmer; Jan van Lunzen; Mathias Lichterfeld; Xiaojiang Gao; Todd M Allen; Mary Carrington; Bruce D Walker; Juergen K Rockstroh; Marcus Altfeld Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Matthew C Strain; Susan J Little; Eric S Daar; Diane V Havlir; Huldrych F Gunthard; Ruby Y Lam; Otto A Daly; Juin Nguyen; Caroline C Ignacio; Celsa A Spina; Douglas D Richman; Joseph K Wong Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2005-03-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: C D Pilcher; D C Shugars; S A Fiscus; W C Miller; P Menezes; J Giner; B Dean; K Robertson; C E Hart; J L Lennox; J J Eron ; C B Hicks Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-05-04 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Kimberly A Powers; Azra C Ghani; William C Miller; Irving F Hoffman; Audrey E Pettifor; Gift Kamanga; Francis Ea Martinson; Myron S Cohen Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joanne D Stekler; Paul D Swenson; Robert W Coombs; Joan Dragavon; Katherine K Thomas; Catherine A Brennan; Sushil G Devare; Robert W Wood; Matthew R Golden Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Joanne D Stekler; Joshua D O'Neal; Aric Lane; Fred Swanson; Janine Maenza; Claire E Stevens; Robert W Coombs; Joan A Dragavon; Paul D Swenson; Matthew R Golden; Bernard M Branson Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Myron S Cohen; Ying Q Chen; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; Mina C Hosseinipour; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; James G Hakim; Johnstone Kumwenda; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Jose H S Pilotto; Sheela V Godbole; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Breno R Santos; Kenneth H Mayer; Irving F Hoffman; Susan H Eshleman; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Leslie Cottle; Xinyi C Zhang; Joseph Makhema; Lisa A Mills; Ravindre Panchia; Sharlaa Faesen; Joseph Eron; Joel Gallant; Diane Havlir; Susan Swindells; Vanessa Elharrar; David Burns; Taha E Taha; Karin Nielsen-Saines; David D Celentano; Max Essex; Sarah E Hudelson; Andrew D Redd; Thomas R Fleming Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245