Literature DB >> 34974116

Using diffusion tensor imaging to effectively target TMS to deep brain structures.

Bruce Luber1, Simon W Davis2, Zhi-De Deng3, David Murphy4, Andrew Martella4, Angel V Peterchev5, Sarah H Lisanby3.   

Abstract

TMS has become a powerful tool to explore cortical function, and in parallel has proven promising in the development of therapies for various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Unfortunately, much of the inference of the direct effects of TMS has been assumed to be limited to the area a few centimeters beneath the scalp, though clearly more distant regions are likely to be influenced by structurally connected stimulation sites. In this study, we sought to develop a novel paradigm to individualize TMS coil placement to non-invasively achieve activation of specific deep brain targets of relevance to the treatment of psychiatric disorders. In ten subjects, structural diffusion imaging tractography data were used to identify an accessible cortical target in the right frontal pole that demonstrated both anatomic and functional connectivity to right Brodmann area 25 (BA25). Concurrent TMS-fMRI interleaving was used with a series of single, interleaved TMS pulses applied to the right frontal pole at four intensity levels ranging from 80% to 140% of motor threshold. In nine of ten subjects, TMS to the individualized frontal pole sites resulted in significant linear increase in BOLD activation of BA25 with increasing TMS intensity. The reliable activation of BA25 in a dosage-dependent manner suggests the possibility that the careful combination of imaging with TMS can make use of network properties to help overcome depth limitations and allow noninvasive brain stimulation to influence deep brain structures.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Connectivity; Diffusion imaging tractography; Subgenual cingulate cortex; TMS; Targeting; deep brain stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34974116      PMCID: PMC8851689          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  85 in total

Review 1.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Craig M Bennett; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Stimulation of the human frontal eye fields modulates sensitivity of extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Nilli Lavie; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Corticostriatal functional interactions in Parkinson's disease: a rTMS/[11C]raclopride PET study.

Authors:  Antonio P Strafella; Ji Hyun Ko; Joshua Grant; Maria Fraraccio; Oury Monchi
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  The brain's intention to imitate: the neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation.

Authors:  Nina Bien; Alard Roebroeck; Rainer Goebel; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  A [17F]-fluoromethane PET/TMS study of effective connectivity.

Authors:  Fabio Ferrarelli; H Magnus Haraldsson; Todd E Barnhart; Andy D Roberts; Terrence R Oakes; Marcello Massimini; Charles K Stone; Ned H Kalin; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Donald A Malone; Darin D Dougherty; Ali R Rezai; Linda L Carpenter; Gerhard M Friehs; Emad N Eskandar; Scott L Rauch; Steven A Rasmussen; Andre G Machado; Cynthia S Kubu; Audrey R Tyrka; Lawrence H Price; Paul H Stypulkowski; Jonathon E Giftakis; Mark T Rise; Paul F Malloy; Stephen P Salloway; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Four electric field modeling methods of Dosing Prefrontal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Introducing APEX MT dosimetry.

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Xingbao Li; Mark S George
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  A novel concurrent TMS-fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation.

Authors:  Jord J T Vink; Stefano Mandija; Petar I Petrov; Cornells A T van den Berg; Iris E C Sommer; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates dopamine release in the ipsilateral anterior cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sang Soo Cho; Antonio P Strafella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gray and white matter integrity influence TMS signal propagation: a multimodal evaluation in cocaine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Tonisha E Kearney-Ramos; Daniel H Lench; Michaela Hoffman; Brittany Correia; Logan T Dowdle; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex engages thalamus, striatum, and the default mode network.

Authors:  Elisabeth de Castro Caparelli; Osama A Abulseoud; Hong Gu; Tianye Zhai; Brooke Schleyer; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 5.152

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.