Literature DB >> 34972702

Comparison of Macro-and Micro-porosity of a Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration: An In Vivo Experimental Study.

Motoki Senoo1,2, Akira Hasuike3,4, Takanobu Yamamoto2, Yasumasa Ozawa2, Norihisa Watanabe2, Mitsuaki Furuhata1,2, Shuichi Sato2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is one of the surgical methods used for vertical ridge augmentation prior to dental implant placements. Titanium meshes have been used for osteogenic space maintenance in GBR sites by clinicians. We aimed to compare the influence of micropores and macropores in a titanium mesh on bone regeneration in a rat calvarial vertical GBR model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The calvaria of nine rats were exposed, and plastic cylinders were set bilaterally. Eighteen surgical sites were randomly allocated into three groups according to the materials of titanium lid and bone substitutes: microporous titanium lid+deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), macroporous titanium lid +DBBM, microporous titanium lid+carbonate apatite. Newly generated bone inside the cylinders was evaluated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Furthermore, bone regeneration and angiogenesis were evaluated histologically at 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Quantitative volumetric analyses using micro-CT showed a gradual increase in bone volume inside the cylinders in all three groups. Histological observation confirmed vigorous bone regeneration in the microporous groups compared to that in the macroporous group. In the upper part of the cylinders, soft tissue invaded the GBR site by passing through the pores of the macroporous mesh. The blood vessels in the upper part of the cylinders were smaller in the microporous groups than in the macroporous group. There was no difference in bone formation between cylinders filled with DBBM or carbonate apatite.
CONCLUSION: Microvasculature penetrates 50-μm diameter micropores and accelerates bone formation inside the cylinder, which was set on rat calvaria. The microporous titanium mesh can facilitate angiogenesis from both the dura mater and periosteal in vertical ridge augmentation. Our data showed superiority of microporous titanium vascular permeability and osteoconductivity, supporting bone growth.
Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar ridge augmentation; GBR; X-ray microtomography; bone regeneration; dental implants; skull

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34972702      PMCID: PMC8765184          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  22 in total

1.  Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration.

Authors:  C Dahlin; A Linde; J Gottlow; S Nyman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Vertical ridge augmentation with titanium-reinforced, dense-PTFE membranes and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 19 patients.

Authors:  Istvan A Urban; Jaime L Lozada; Sascha A Jovanovic; Heiner Nagursky; Katalin Nagy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  New microperforated pure titanium membrane created by laser processing for guided regeneration of bone.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; S Masui; H Ishihata
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants.

Authors:  T von Arx; N Hardt; B Wallkamm
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Autogenous bone with or without hydroxyapatite bone substitute augmentation in rat calvarium within a plastic cap.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Oginuma; Shuichi Sato; Asami Udagawa; Yuka Saito; Yoshinori Arai; Koichi Ito
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2012-02-25

6.  Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Duygu Yaman; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Effects of marrow penetration on bone augmentation within a titanium cap in rabbit calvarium.

Authors:  Seiko Min; Shuichi Sato; Masakazu Murai; Kenji Okuno; Yoshiaki Fujisaki; Yutaka Yamada; Koichi Ito
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Effectiveness of vertical ridge augmentation interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Istvan A Urban; Eduardo Montero; Alberto Monje; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 9.  Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: current application and progress.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Songhang Li; Tianxu Zhang; Chao Wang; Xiaoxiao Cai
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.