Literature DB >> 34968398

COVID-19 associated hospitalization in 571 patients with fibromyalgia-A population-based study.

Mor Amital1,2, Niv Ben-Shabat2,3, Howard Amital1,2,3,4,5, Dan Buskila5, Arnon D Cohen4,5,6, Daniela Amital5,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify predicators of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) that are associated with a severe COVID-19 disease course.
METHODS: We utilized the data base of the Clalit Health Services (CHS); the largest public organization in Israel, and extracted data concerning patients with FM. We matched two subjects without FM to each subject with FM by sex and age and geographic location. Baseline characteristics were evaluated by t-test for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables. Predictors of COVID-19 associated hospitalization were identified using univariable logistic regression model, significant variables were selected and analyzed by a multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: The initial cohort comprised 18,598 patients with FM and 36,985 matched controls. The mean age was 57.5± 14.5(SD), with a female dominance of 91%. Out of this cohort we extracted the study population, which included all patients contracted with COVID-19, and consisted of 571 patients with FM and 1008 controls. By multivariable analysis, the following variables were found to predict COVID-19 associated hospitalization in patients with FM: older age (OR, 1.25; CI, 1.13-1.39; p<0.001), male sex (OR, 2.63; CI, 1.18-5.88; p<0.05) and hypertension (OR, 1.75; CI, 1.04-2.95; p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The current population-based study revealed that FM per se was not directly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization or related mortality. Yet classical risk factors endangering the general population were also relevant among patients with FM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34968398      PMCID: PMC8717981          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by widespread pain, unrefreshing sleep, fatigue, and cognitive impairment. Headaches, sensitive bladder, irritable bowel disease and temporal-mandibular discomfort, are also often encountered in these patients [1]. FM is the second most common rheumatological condition with a female dominance ranging between 4–9:1 [2]. It is accepted that FM may be triggered by various infectious diseases [3, 4]; Buskila et al [5] revealed high rates of FM (16%) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, compared to subjects with non-HCV-related cirrhosis (3%), similarly, hepatitis B carriage appears to increase the risk of FM [6]. Accumulating evidence suggest that an imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines may facilitate the emergence of neuropathic pain [7]. Furthermore, elevated serum concentrations of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-1RA were detected in patients with FM [7-9]. These proinflammatory cytokines up regulate the expression of pain mediators such as substance P, which decrease pain threshold. The COVID19 global pandemic created numerous global challenges among them in particular is the overwhelming hospitalization rates of patients with the disease that saturated the capacities of our health systems. After an extended stay in these designated medical units, patients recovering from severe COVID-19 report a long and painful convalescence [10]. Since the management of COVID-19 patients is primarily supportive, many patients experience a distressing course, which is sometimes on the verge of death. Such experiences often results in consequent post-traumatic ideation, high levels of anxiety and consequent development of mood disorders [11] The aim of our study was to analyze the patterns of morbidity and mortality in a large cohort of patients with FM who were positive with the SARS COV-2 and to assess whether they were more vulnerable to its deleterious outcomes. In order to do so we used the Clalit Health Care Services (CHS) database the largest Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) in Israel.

Methods

Study design and study population

This is a retrospective longitudinal study, investigating predictors for COVID-19 associated hospitalization in patients with FM. The current study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the CHS. CHS is the largest HMO in Israel with widespread primary, secondary, and tertiary medical services covering almost 5 million citizens. CHS database enables access to a wide range of clinical data, as it receives information from various live logistical, pharmaceutical and medical sources. The current primary cohort includes all patients with FM who were registered between the years 2002–2018 (n = 18,598). We also formed a control group, electing for each FM patient two controls adjusted by age, gender and geographic location (n = 36,985). The controls were selected by a computerized algorithm that was applied on the database. The diagnosis of FM did not appear in their computerized medical records. The algorithm was provided selection of individuals that will have a similar distribution of their demographic parameters. Based on this primary cohort we conducted a subgroup analysis including all patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic in Israel until 21 of October 2020. A total of 571 patients with FM and 1008 controls were included in this analysis.

COVID-19-related variables

COVID-19 diagnosis was based on confirmation of all cases by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved molecular tests. COVID-19-associated hospitalization was defined as patients admitted to intensive care units, internal medicine, or pulmonary inpatients wards. The severity of non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, who did not require admission to a medical facility was termed for the purpose of this study as “subclinical”.

Definition of FM-related and comorbidity variables

Patients were defined as having FM if their medical records contained at least one diagnosis by a physician. Chronic comorbidities were obtained by the chronic registry of CHS. All comorbidities were encoded prior to the onset of the pandemic. Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy. Atherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA).

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were described by means and standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables, categorical variables were characterized by percentages. Differences between groups were calculated by t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continues variables and chi-square for categorical variables. Comorbidities were registered prior to the onset of the pandemic. The association between comorbidities variables and COVID-19 associated hospitalization were evaluated using univariable logistic regression and were reported as odd ration (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Significant variables (p<0.05) were included in the multivariable logistic regression and were reported as odd ration (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Characteristics of the study population

The initial cohort comprised 18,598 patients with FM and 36,985 controls matched by age, gender, and geographical location. The mean age was 57.5± 14.5(SD), with a female dominance of 91%. The secondary subgroup analysis cohort consisted of 571 patients with FM and 1008 controls with a diagnosis of COVID-19. The mean age of the FM group was 56.2± 13.7 (SD) and 92.6% were females. The mean age of the control group was 54.8± 13.3(SD) with 90.6% females. The two groups did not differ significantly by sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. However, a significantly difference was measured by age (FM-56.2 vs. non-FM-54.8 years, p<0.05) and BMI (FM 30.2 vs. non-FM 28.8, p<0.01). In addition, the FM COVID-19 group had higher rates of comorbidities such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, asthma, atherosclerosis related diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, depression and anxiety (Table 1).
Table 1

Basic characteristics of study population.

Initial cohortCOVID-19 positive cohort
Fibromyalgia (n = 18,598)Controls (n = 36,985)p-valueFibromyalgia (n = 571)Controls (n = 1008)p-value
Age, mean (SD)57.5 (14.1)57.5 (14.1)0.75856.2 (13.7)54.8 (13.3)0.044
BMI, mean (SD)29.1 (6.3)28.1 (6.1)<0.00130.2 (6.3)28.8 (6.1)<0.001
Females, n(%)16,920 (91%)33,651 (91%)0.97529 (92.6%)913 (90.6%)0.164
Ethnicity, (n%)0.990.222
Jewish14,811 (79.6%)29,451 (79.6%)395 (69.2%)719 (71.3%)
Arab3,473 (18.7%)6,915 (18.7%)155 (27.1%)240 (23.8%)
Ultraorthodox Jews314 (1.7%)619 (1.7%)21 (3.7%)49 (4.9%)
Socioeconomic status, n(%)0.970.471
Low8,414 (45.3%)16,770 (45.4%)318 (55.9%)540 (53.8%)
Intermediate7,168 (38.6%)14,235 (38.6%)183 (32.2%)353 (35.2%)
High2,985 (16.1%)5,918 (16.0%)68 (4.3%)111 (11.1%)
Hypertension, n(%)12,419 (33.2%)26,238 (29.1%)<0.001181 (31.7%)276 (27.4%)0.073
Diabetes, n(%)4,183 (22.5%)7,261 (19.6%)<0.001144 (25.2%)197 (19.5%)<0.01
Hyperlipidemia, n(%)11,192 (60.2%)19,176 (51.8%)<0.001327 (57.3%)492 (48.8%)<0.001
Smoking (ever), n(%)6,913 (37.2%)11,106 (30%)<0.001160 (28%)214 (21.2%)<0.01
Asthma, n(%)2,244 (12.1%)2,424 (6.1%)<0.00164 (11.2%)67 (6.6%)<0.01
COPD, n(%)982 (5.3%)946 (2.6%)<0.00118 (3.2%)18 (1.8%)0.113
h/o tuberculosis, n(%)24 (0.1%)31 (0.1%)0.1103 (0.3%)0.557
aAtherosclerosis-related disease, n(%)2,293 (12.3%)3,008 (8.1%)<0.00171 (12.4%)73 (7.2%)<0.001
bStructural heart disease, n(%)1,262 (6.8%)1,632 (4.4%)<0.00134 (6%)40 (4%)0.083
Chronic renal failure, n(%)482 (2.6%)859 (2.3%)0.0539 (1.6%)16 (1.6%)1.000
Cirrhosis, n(%)75 (0.4%)87 (0.2%)<0.0012 (0.4%)2 (0.2%)0.623
Malignancy, n(%)2,187 (11.8%)3,593 (9.7%)<0.00154 (9.5%)69 (6.8%)0.064
Rheumatoid arthritis, n(%)1,039 (5.6%)492 (1.3%)<0.00142 (7.4%)15 (26.3%)<0.001
SLE, n(%)172 (0.9%)110 (0.3%)<0.0019 (1.6%)5 (0.5%)<0.05
Crohn’s, n(%)154 (0.8%)157 (0.4%)<0.0013 (0.5%)1 (0.1%)0.138
Ulcerative colitis, n(%)118 (0.6%)133 (0.4%)<0.0012 (0.4%)2 (0.2%)0.623
Celiac, n(%)138 (0.7%)137 (0.4%)<0.0012 (0.4%)5 (0.5%)0.675
Cushing disease, n(%)39 (0.2%)24 (0.1%)<0.0012 (0.4%)1 (0.1%)0.298
Depression, n(%)5,248 (28.2%)3,531 (9.5%)<0.001140 (24.5%)77 (7.6%)<0.001
Anxiety, n(%)3,873 (20.8%)2,814 (7.6%)<0.001110 (19.3%)58 (5.8%)<0.001
COVID-19 positive, n(%)571 (3.1%)1,008 (2.8%)0.026--
COVID-19 duration, median (IQR)---18.0 (12–31)17.0 (12–31)0.600
COVID-19 hospitalization, n(%)81 (0.4%)125 (0.3%)0.07581 (14.2%)125 (12.4%)0.313
Hospitalization duration, median (IQR)---4.0 (2–9)3 (2–7)0.122
COVID-19 death, n(%)10 (0.1%)17 (0.0%)0.6879 (1.6%)13 (1.3%)0.659
COVID-19 recovery, n(%)411 (2.2%)741(2.0%)0.107393 (68.8%)710 (70.4%)0.530

n-number, COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SLE- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, BMI-body mass index, IQR- interquartile range

aAtherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA)

b Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy.

n-number, COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SLE- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, BMI-body mass index, IQR- interquartile range aAtherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) b Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy. Regarding COVID-19 associated hospitalization and mortality, no significant differences were found between the FM and non-FM COVID-19 patients (p = 0.263, p = 0.659) (Table 1).

Factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in fibromyalgia patients

Table 2 demonstrates factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization. All variables that were significant in the univariate analysis, were included in the multivariable model.
Table 2

Factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in patients with fibromyalgia, obtained from a univariate and a multivariate logistic-regression analysis.

FrequencyUnivariate OR95% CIp-valueMultivariate OR95% CIp-value
Age (5-year increment)63.4±12.91.281.16–1.41<0.0011.251.13–1.39<0.001
Fibromyalgiaa81 (14.2%)1.170.86–1.60NS
BMI (5-kg/m2-increment)31.5±6.51.191.00–1.42<0.05
Male gender10 (12.3%)2.020.95–4.28NS2.631.18–5.88<0.05
Arab ethnicity (vs Jewish ethnicity)20 (24.7%)0.840.49–1.45NS
Ultraorthodox ethnicity (vs Jewish ethnicity)2 (2.5%)1.050.44–2.55NS
Low SES (vs intermediate-high)44 (54.3%)0.930.58–1.49NS
Hypertension41 (50.6%)2.561.59–4.13<0.0011.751.04–2.95<0.05
Diabetes35 (43.2%)2.661.63–4.33<0.001
Hyperlipidemia62 (76.5%)2.771.61–4.77<0.001
Asthma10 (12.3%)1.140.55–2.37NS
COPD6 (7.4%)3.191.16–8.75<0.05
bAtherosclerosis-related disease19 (23.5%)2.581.43–4.65<0.01
cStructural heart disease8 (9.9%)1.960.85–4.48NS
Chronic renal failure4 (4.9%)5.041.32–19.18<0.05
Cirrhosis0--
Malignancy12 (14.8%)1.850.93–3.67NS
Rheumatoid arthritis12 (14.8%)2.671.30–5.45<0.01
SLE1 (1.2%)0.750.09–6.10NS
IBD1 (1.2%)2.030.21–19.75NS
Depression25 (30.9%)1.460.87–2.44NS
Anxiety18 (22.2%)1.240.67–2.19NS

Only variables demonstrating P<0.050 in the univariate analysis were subject to inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model; Variables with cell sizes <5 by status were collapsed to ensure sufficient power in the adjusted model.

COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SLE-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, BMI-body mass index, IBD-Inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative colitis, Crohn).

a Model for this variable included entire study population.

b Atherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA)

c Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy.

Only variables demonstrating P<0.050 in the univariate analysis were subject to inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model; Variables with cell sizes <5 by status were collapsed to ensure sufficient power in the adjusted model. COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SLE-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, BMI-body mass index, IBD-Inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative colitis, Crohn). a Model for this variable included entire study population. b Atherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) c Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy. In the multivariable analysis, the following variables were found to predict COVID-19 associated hospitalization: older age (OR, 1.25; CI, 1.13–1.39; p<0.001), male sex (OR, 2.63; CI, 1.18–5.88; p<0.05) and hypertension (OR, 1.75; CI, 1.04–2.95; p<0.05). All the other above-mentioned comorbidities did not contribute to a more severe COVID-19 disease in patients with FM.

Factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in controls patients

Factors associated to COVID-19 hospitalization are represented in Table 3. All variables that were significant in the univariable model, were included in the multivariable model. In this analysis the following variables predicted COVID-19 associated hospitalization: older age (OR, 1.33; 95% CI; p<0.001), BMI (OR, 1.22; 95% CI; p<0.01), COPD (OR, 3.85; 95% CI; p<0.01) and chronic renal failure (OR, 6.45; 95% CI; p<0.001). A similar analysis for the combined cohort is presented in (S1 Table).
Table 3

Factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in controls, obtained from a univariate and a multivariate logistic-regression analysis.

FrequencyUnivariate OR95% CIp-valueMultivariate OR95% CIp-value
Age (5-year increment)63.7 ± 13.31.361.26–1.47<0.0011.331.22–1.44<0.001
BMI (5-kg/m2-increment30.4± 7.51.261.09–1.46<0.0011.221.05–1.43<0.01
Male gender19 (15.2%)1.901.11–3.27<0.01
Arab ethnicity (vs Jewish ethnicity)35 (29.4%)1.290.84–1.97NS
Ultraorthodox ethnicity (vs Jewish ethnicity)6 (6.7%)0.600.14–2.64NS
Low SES (vs intermediate-high)44 (54.3%)0.800.55–1.16NS
Hypertension63 (50.4%)3.202.18–4.69<0.001
Diabetes43 (34.4%)2.481.65–3.73<0.001
Hyperlipidemia86 (68.8%)2.591.73–3.87<0.001
Asthma14 (11.2%1.971.06–3.68<0.05
COPD8 (6.4%)5.972.31–15.43<0.0013.851.41–10.51<0.01
aAtherosclerosis-related disease15 (12%)1.941.06–3.54<0.05
bStructural heart disease10 (8%)2.471.18–5.19<0.05
Chronic renal failure10 (8%)12.714.54–35.62**<0.0016.452.14–19.58<0.001
Cirrhosis1 (0.8%)7.110.44–114NS
Malignancy10 (8%)1.210.60–2.44NS
Rheumatoid arthritis2 (1.6%)1.010.24–4.88NS
SLE4 (3.2%)29.163.23–263<0.01
IBD2 (1.6%)14.341.29–159
Depression17 (13.6%)2.161.21–3.84
Anxiety11 (8.8%)1.720.86–3.40

Only variables demonstrating P<0.050 in the univariate analysis were subject to inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model; Variables with cell sizes <5 by status were collapsed to ensure sufficient power in the adjusted model.

COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SLE-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, BMI-body mass index, IBD-Inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative colitis, Crohn).

a Atherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA)

b Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy.

Only variables demonstrating P<0.050 in the univariate analysis were subject to inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression model; Variables with cell sizes <5 by status were collapsed to ensure sufficient power in the adjusted model. COPD-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SLE-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, BMI-body mass index, IBD-Inflammatory bowel diseases (Ulcerative colitis, Crohn). a Atherosclerotic related disease was defined as one of the following: ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) b Structural heart disease was defined as either valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy.

Discussion

Many of the symptoms of the “post infectious” disorders resemble those of FM, such as fatigue, myalgia and sleep disturbances. Several studies shed light on the role of infectious diseases on the pathogenesis of FM [3-6]. The current population-based study revealed that FM per se was not directly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization or related mortality. In both groups age was statistically associated with COVID-19 related hospitalization, in addition to male sex and hypertension in the FM group and BMI, coexisting COPD and chronic renal failure in the non-FM group. Although the majority of the subjects were females, male sex was found to be associated to COVID-19 hospitalization in the FM group. Even though FM is more common in women, Buskila et al [12] described that men with FM had more severe symptoms compared to matched women. Regrading this subject, men with COVID-19 tend to develop more serious outcomes and higher rates of death compared to women [13]. As expected, FM patients had higher rates of depression (p<0.001) and anxiety (p<0.001). These findings are in concordance with previous studies suggesting that FM patients have higher rates of psychiatric conditions [14-21]. According to the Canadian Community Health Survey database, the prevalence of major depression was three times higher in subjects with FM than in those without the condition [22]. An Italian group observed a correlation between lifetime exposure to traumatic events and post-traumatic symptoms, to the severity of FM symptoms [15]. In this 52.8% of patients with FM met the criteria of major depression and 67.1% of panic disorder. In this study We found that depression was significantly associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in the non-FM group according to the univariable analysis model (OR, 2.16; 95% CI; p<0.01), whereas in the FM group it had no additional impact. This may be attributed to the fact that the FM group had significantly higher rates of depression compared to the control group at the baseline analysis (p<0.001). Thus, depression is not a discriminative feature as many of the FM patients have comorbid depression. As could be expected the FM group in our study had higher proportions of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. In several studies, high rates of FM diagnoses had been found in patients with rheumatic diseases [18, 19, 23]. Torrente-Segarra et al. [20] examined 3,591 patients with SLE in a cross sectional study and showed that the rates of FM diagnoses in SLE patients was significantly higher compared to the general population, especially in later stages of the disease. Wolfe and Michaud [21] reported that out of 11,866 patients with RA, 2078 (17.5%) fulfilled the criteria of FM diagnoses, this subgroup of patients had a more severe form of RA and higher major comorbid conditions. In the current study FM patients had higher rates of diabetes and hyperlipidemia than the control group. Several studies reported higher proportions of FM in patients with diabetes, ranging from 9 to 23.3% [24, 25]. Based on a Taiwanese database of 47,270 patients with FM and 189,112 matched controls, the overall risk of stroke was 1.25-fold higher in FM group compared to the non-FM group [26]. Our study also found that FM patients had higher proportion of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. One cannot exclude that co-linearity might have obscured the outcomes of this study. Our study corroborates that COPD, BMI, male gender, chronic renal failure, hypertension and age are established risk factors that contribute to a severe form of COVID-19 [27-30]. In conclusion, our study has shown that FM does not contribute as an independent risk factor to severe COVID-19 related morbidity or mortality. As infectious diseases may facilitate the appearance of FM, further research should be done on the effects of "post COVID-19 syndrome" and its relation to the emergence of FM.

Factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization in the entire study population, obtained from a univariate and a multivariate logistic-regression analysis.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file. 8 Oct 2021 PONE-D-21-20356 COVID-19 associated hospitalization and mortality in 571 patients with fibromyalgia - A population-based study PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Amital, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. # reviewer 1 Mor Amital et al in their manuscript entitled "COVID-19 associated hospitalization and mortality in 571 patients with fibromyalgia - A population-based study" tried to explore where the presence of fibromyalgia (FM) are associated with a severe COVID-19 disease course. However, there are some major concerns. 1.   I am confused about the outcome of this research. In the Method part, authors defined the “COVID-19 hospitalization” as the outcome, whereas from the title or conclusion, we can see “COVID-19 hospitalization and/or related mortality” was the outcome. Please clarify this point. 2.   As authors mentioned “We also formed a control group, electing for each FM patient two controls adjusted by age, gender and geographic location”, how did you make the match? Where did you choose the controls? 3.   Please check whether the variables “hospitalization duration” and “COVID-19 duration” follows normal distribution. If not, it is not proper to use mean (SD) to describe it. 4.   Authors conducted different multivariable logistic regressions in FM patients and controls, respectively. I think performing multivariable logistic regressions in the whole cohort (combining the FM patients and controls ) would be preferable. # reviewer 2 Amital et al in their manuscript entitled "COVID-19 associated hospitalization and mortality in 571 patients with fibromyalgia - A population-based study" tried to find the association of fibromyalgia and COVID-19 hospitalization or related mortality in the COVID-19 patients. It is an interesting study. However, there are some major concerns. 1.     In the introduction, it is not clear that the COVID-19 patients also experienced fibromyalgia. 2.     Please explain why the fibromyalgia and control group were chosen as 1 to 2 rather than 1 to 1. 3.     Amital at al please clarify how the control group was chosen since the patients also have similar conditions, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, as you mentioned fibromyalgia was common rheumatology condition. What was the exclusion criteria for FM and control group? 4.     What were the levels of the inflammatory biomarkers, e.g. IL-6, IL-8, CRP…? 5.     Please define the abbreviates first, e.g. HCV and use accurate term “peripheral arterial disease” rather than “peripheral heart disease”. Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 06 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Ying-Mei Feng Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf. 2. In the methods section of your manuscript, please thoroughly describe how the diagnosis of fibromyalgia was established in your cohort 3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “this study was not sponsored by any party” At this time, please address the following queries: a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders. d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work. 4. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: “NO authors have competing interests” Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state ""The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide. 6. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ 7 Dec 2021 Saturday, October 23, 2021 PLOS1 - Editor Dear Editor, Thank you for considering our manuscript “COVID-19 associated hospitalization and mortality in 571 patients with fibromyalgia - A population-based study” [PONE-D-21-20356]. We thank the reviewers for their efforts, we will present in this letter the modifications that had been done in our manuscript according to their comments. # reviewer 1 I am confused about the outcome of this research. In the Method part, authors defined the “COVID-19 hospitalization” as the outcome, whereas from the title or conclusion, we can see “COVID-19 hospitalization and/or related mortality” was the outcome. Please clarify this point. We agree with the reviewer, since there was a small number of deceased, we clarified the outcome in the title and omitted the term mortality. As authors mentioned “We also formed a control group, electing for each FM patient two controls adjusted by age, gender and geographic location”, how did you make the match? Where did you choose the controls? We accept this comment and added the following statement “The controls were selected by a computerized algorithm that was applied on the database. The diagnosis of FM did not appear in their computerized medical records. The algorithm was provided selection of individuals that will have a similar distribution of their demographic parameters.” We added this clarification to the text (page 4). 3. Please check whether the variables “hospitalization duration” and “COVID-19 duration” follows normal distribution. If not, it is not proper to use mean (SD) to describe it. Thank you for the comment. These continuous variables do not follow normal distribution and their description was changed to median (IQR). 4. Authors conducted different multivariable logistic regressions in FM patients and controls, respectively. I think performing multivariable logistic regressions in the whole cohort (combining the FM patients and controls) would be preferable. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for poor COVID-19 related outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia and to investigate whether fibromyalgia for itself is a risk factor of that kind. For the second purpose mentioned we used a multivariable model in the whole cohort as suggested, we added a footnote to the Table 2 to further clarify that issue. For the first purpose such a model is irrelevant in our opinion as we did not intend to discover general risk factors for COVID-19 related poor outcomes (nor do the study population is representative for such purpose). Nonetheless, we added a table addressing the entire cohort in the supplementary materials (page 6). # reviewer 2 In the introduction, it is not clear that the COVID-19 patients also experienced fibromyalgia. Thank you for the comment, we clarified this issue on page 3. Please explain why the fibromyalgia and control group were chosen as 1 to 2 rather than 1 to 1. Choosing multiple controls for a given number of cases increase the power of the study and enables to detect minor associations and in different subgroups. Amital at al please clarify how the control group was chosen since the patients also have similar conditions, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, as you mentioned fibromyalgia was common rheumatology condition. What was the exclusion criteria for FM and control group? As mentioned above in our comment to reviewer 1 that we applied a computerized algorithm to all subjects in the same HMO that did not have fibromyalgia, their selection was based on obtaining similar distribution of demographic parameters. All these individuals never had the diagnosis of fibromyalgia included in their medical records (see page 4). What were the levels of the inflammatory biomarkers, e.g. IL-6, IL-8, CRP…? Unfortunately, these parameters were not available for our analysis. It should be mentioned that cytokine levels are not part of the routine tests in our country. Please define the abbreviates first, e.g. HCV and use accurate term “peripheral arterial disease” rather than “peripheral heart disease”. We thank the reviewer for the comment, these aspects were corrected in the text. We thank the reviewers for their efforts, we modified the text accordingly and hope that paper will find in its new form appealing to the readership. Sincerely yours Howard Amital, MD, MHA Submitted filename: response to reviwers.docx Click here for additional data file. 10 Dec 2021 COVID-19 associated hospitalization in 571 patients with fibromyalgia - A population-based study PONE-D-21-20356R1 Dear Dr. Amital, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Ying-Mei Feng Academic Editor PLOS ONE 17 Dec 2021 PONE-D-21-20356R1 COVID-19 associated hospitalization in 571 patients with fibromyalgia - A population-based study Dear Dr. Amital: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr Ying-Mei Feng Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  28 in total

1.  The "chronic, active Epstein-Barr virus infection" syndrome and primary fibromyalgia.

Authors:  D Buchwald; D L Goldenberg; J L Sullivan; A L Komaroff
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1987-10

Review 2.  Prevalence of fibromyalgia in general population and patients, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Heidari; Mahdi Afshari; Mahmood Moosazadeh
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  The complexities of fibromyalgia and its comorbidities.

Authors:  Adi Lichtenstein; Shmuel Tiosano; Howard Amital
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Fibromyalgia frequency in hepatitis B carriers.

Authors:  Burhan Adak; Ibrahim Tekeoğlu; Levent Ediz; Mustafa Budancamanak; Turan Yazgan; Kasim Karahocagil; Adnan Demirel
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.517

5.  Fibromyalgia syndrome in men.

Authors:  D Buskila; L Neumann; A Alhoashle; M Abu-Shakra
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), worse outcomes, comorbid illness, and sociodemographic disadvantage characterize ra patients with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 7.  Fibromyalgia and cytokines.

Authors:  Ignasi Rodriguez-Pintó; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Amital Howard; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  What is the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on temperament and character in patients with fibromyalgia?

Authors:  Marianna Mazza; Osvaldo Mazza; Massimiliano Pomponi; Marco Di Nicola; Luca Padua; Massimo Vicini; Pietro Bria; Salvatore Mazza
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.735

9.  Obesity and its Implications for COVID-19 Mortality.

Authors:  William Dietz; Carlos Santos-Burgoa
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 10.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: cytokines in fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  Nurcan Uçeyler; Winfried Häuser; Claudia Sommer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between COVID-19 and fibromyalgia syndrome: prevalence, pandemic effects, symptom mechanisms, and COVID-19 vaccines.

Authors:  Burhan Fatih Kocyigit; Ahmet Akyol
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Evaluation of pain, disease activity, anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain levels after COVID-19 infection in fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  Dilek Eker Büyükşireci; Ayla Çağlıyan Türk; Ender Erden; Ebru Erden
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.089

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.