| Literature DB >> 34966953 |
Luis Martí-Bonmatí1, Alejandro Rodríguez-Ortega2, Amadeo Ten-Esteve2, Ángel Alberich-Bayarri2,3, Bernardo Celda4, Eduardo Ferrer5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indirect 1H-magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of 17O-labelled water allows imaging in vivo dynamic changes in water compartmentalisation. Our aim was to describe the feasibility of indirect 1H-MR methods to evaluate the effect of H217O on the MR relaxation rates by using conventional a 3-T equipment and voxel-wise relaxation rates.Entities:
Keywords: Brain; Magnetic resonance imaging; Oxygen-17; Phantoms (imaging); Rats
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966953 PMCID: PMC8716803 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-021-00246-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol Exp ISSN: 2509-9280
Magnetic resonance sequences used for the relaxation times calculations
| Sequences | Echo time (TE); repetition time (TR) | Flip angle | Acquisition matrix; voxel size (mm) | SENSE acceleration factor; number of acquisitions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo with variable flip angle | TE = 4.6 ms; TR = 14 ms | 5 different (5°, 10°, 15°, 20° and 45°) | 192 × 192 × 15; 1.88 × 1.88 × 5 | 2; 1 |
| Two-dimensional T2*-weighted gradient-echo | TR = 13; 12 TEs. Two different acquisitions with different echo time intervals (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ms; and 15, 17.8, 20.6, 23.4, 26.2, 29, 31.8, 34.6, 37.4, 40.2, 43, 45.8 ms) | 10° | 96 × 96 × 13; 1.88 × 1.88 × 5 | 1.8; 1 |
| Two-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo | TR = 800; 8 TEs. Four different acquisitions with different echo time intervals (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 ms; 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160 ms; 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, 280, 320 ms; 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400 ms) | 90° | 96 × 96 × 1; 1.67 × 1.67 × 5 | 1; 1 |
SENSE Sensitivity encoding parallel imaging method
Fig. 1Phantom (a), magnetic resonance images (b), and T2 parametric maps (c) obtained in the study with the automated regions-of-interest selection within the tubes
Fig. 2Boxplot of the R2 relaxation rates and H217O concentrations as measured with the phantom studies. The linear fitting and equation are shown
Fig. 3Mean relative normalised R2 values of the rat brain over the 246 min. Time 0 corresponds to the precontrast magnetic resonance images
Fig. 4R2 parametric maps of the rat brain before (PRE), after (3 min, POST1) and relative normalised change (R2POST1 minus R2PRE)/R2PRE). The normalised R2 changes reflect the local distribution of labelled water