| Literature DB >> 34966774 |
Timothy Y Wang1, Christine Park1, Hanci Zhang2, Shervin Rahimpour1, Kelly R Murphy1, C Rory Goodwin1, Isaac O Karikari1, Khoi D Than1, Christopher I Shaffrey1, Norah Foster3, Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr1.
Abstract
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a debilitating disease that poses significant functional and economic burden on both the individual and societal levels. Prognosis is dependent on the extent of the spinal injury and the severity of neurological dysfunction. If not treated rapidly, patients with TSCI can suffer further secondary damage and experience escalating disability and complications. It is important to quickly assess the patient to identify the location and severity of injury to make a decision to pursue a surgical and/or conservative management. However, there are many conditions that factor into the management of TSCI patients, ranging from the initial presentation of the patient to long-term care for optimal recovery. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the etiologies of spinal cord injury and the complications that may arise, and present an algorithm to aid in the management of TSCI.Entities:
Keywords: complications; management; review; surgery; traumatic spinal cord injury
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966774 PMCID: PMC8710452 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.698736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scoring system.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Complete: no preservation of function below level of injury, and no sacral sparing (S4-S5) | A |
| Incomplete: sensory but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level with sacral sparing | B |
| Incomplete: motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade <3 | C |
| Incomplete: motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more | D |
| Normal: motor and sensory function are normal | E |
Figure 1Evaluation process of spinal cord injury.
Summary of association between mean arterial pressure and neurological outcome in acute spinal cord injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Vale et al. ( | Prospective assessment of 77 SCI patients treated with aggressive hemodynamic support, MAP >85 (no control group) × 7 days | III | Improved outcome with aggressive medical care, distinct from potential benefit from surgery at 1-year follow-up |
| Levi et al. ( | 50 patients treated with aggressive medical treatment, MAP > 90 × 7 days | III | Improved outcome with aggressive hemodynamic support at 6-week follow-up |
| Levi et al. ( | 103 SCI patient (50 incomplete, 52 complete injuries), hemodynamic support, MAP > 85 | III | Improved neurological outcome (no difference between early and late surgery group) |
| Tator et al. ( | 144 SCI patients managed with aggressive hemodynamic support | III | Improved neurological outcome, less mortality and earlier transfer from ICU care |
| Zach et al. ( | Prospective assessment of 117 SCI patients with aggressive pressure support | III | Improved neurological outcome with aggressive medical treatment and blood pressure management |
| Dakson et al. ( | Retrospective review of MAP pressure trends in 94 SCI cases | III | Higher rates of neurologic recovery in patients who maintained MAP > 85 mmHg consistently over course of 5 days |
| Hawryluk et al. ( | Retrospective review of MAP pressure trends by minute in 100 SCI cases | III | Higher average MAP values correlated with improved recovery in first 2–3 days for those who had 5 days of support |
ICU, intensive care unit; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SCI, spinal cord injury.
Summary of association between methylprednisolone use and neurological outcome in acute spinal cord injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Matsumoto et al. ( | Prospective, randomized, double blind I study in 46 SCI patients for the purpose of comparing medical complications | I | Methylprednisolone patients had higher incidence of complications (56.5 vs. 34.8%, NS) |
| Pointillart et al. ( | Multicenter, prospective, randomized I clinical trial of 106 SCI patients treated with MP, nimodipine, MP + nimodipine, or no pharmacological agent | I | No difference in neurological outcome between groups at 1-year (small sample size) Infection, GI bleed, and hyperglycemia higher in MP patients |
| Bracken et al. ( | NASCIS III | I (Reported positive results III) | |
| Bracken et al. ( | NASCIS II: 1-year follow up | I (Reported positive results III) | |
| Bracken et al. ( | NASCIS II | I (Reported positive results III) |
ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; GI, gastrointestinal; MP, methylprednisolone; NASCIS, National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study; NS, not significant; SCI, spinal cord injury.
Summary of relationship between timing of surgery and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ng et al. ( | 26 | Cervical | ± 8 h | Laminectomy | Patients with surgical decompression within 8 h showed significantly shorter overall hospital and intensive care unit stay and had fewer systemic complications and improved neurological outcomes |
| Cengiz et al. ( | 27 | Thoracic/Lumbar | ± 8 h | Decompression and stabilization | Patients with surgical decompression within 8 h showed significantly shorter overall hospital stays and better neurological outcomes |
| Fehlings et al. ( | 313 | Cervical | ± 24 h | Decompression and stabilization | Patients with decompression within 24 h had ≥2 ASIA scores at 6-month follow-up than those receiving delayed surgery (≥24 h) |
| Wilson et al. ( | 84 | Cervical/Thoracic/ | ± 24 h | Decompression and stabilization | Patients with decompression surgery <24 h post-injury had greater ASIA motor recovery than those with surgery ≥24 h post-SCI |
| Bourassa-Moreau et al. ( | 431 | Cervical/Thoracic/ | <24 h vs. 24–72 h | Decompression and stabilization | Intervention within 72 h post-injury predicted lower complication rates such as pneumonia, UTI during hospitalization |
| Rahimi-Movghar et al. ( | 35 | Thoracic/Lumbar | ± 24 h | Decompression and stabilization | No significant difference in motor recovery at 12-months postoperatively for patients undergoing surgery <24 h of injury compared with those undergoing surgery between 24 and 72 h, limited by small sample size ( |
| Dvorak et al. ( | 888 | Cervical/Thoracic/ | ± 24 h | Decompression and stabilization | Surgical intervention <24 h of injury associated with increased ASIA motor recovery and in ASIA A, B patients, association with significantly shorter LOS |
| Badhiwala et al. ( | 1,548 | Cervical/Thoracic/ | ± 24 h | Decompression and stabilization | Patients who had early decompression experienced greater recovery, higher total motor and sensory scores, and had better ASIA grades at 1 year after surgery |
ASIA, American Spinal Injury Association; LOS, length of study; SCI, spinal cord injury; STASCIS, Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study; UTI, urinary tract infection.
Figure 2Algorithm for managing acute spinal cord injury.