| Literature DB >> 34964530 |
Eva K Kempers1, Calvin B van Kwawegen1, Joke de Meris2, Saskia E M Schols3, Karin P M van Galen4, Karina Meijer5, Marjon H Cnossen6, Johanna G van der Bom7,8, Karin Fijnvandraat9,10, Jeroen Eikenboom11,12, Ferdows Atiq1, Frank W G Leebeek1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The negative impact of haemophilia on social participation is well established in previous studies, however, the impact of Von Willebrand disease (VWD) on social participation has not been studied. AIM: To compare the social participation of a large cohort of VWD patients in the Netherlands with the general Dutch population. In addition, to identify factors associated with social participation in VWD.Entities:
Keywords: absenteeism; bleeding; cross-sectional studies; educational status; social participation; von Willebrand Diseases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34964530 PMCID: PMC9304182 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Haemophilia ISSN: 1351-8216 Impact factor: 4.263
Patient characteristics
| Children (0–16 years) | Adults (16–99 years) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 ( | Type 2 ( | Type 3 ( | Type 1 ( | Type 2 ( | Type 3 ( | |
| Age (years) |
9.0* [6.0–12.8] |
6.0* [2.0–10.0] |
11.0* [7.0–12.0] |
45.0 [34.0–57.0] |
46.0 [32.0–59.0] |
45.0 [29.0–58.0] |
| Sex, female (%) | 28 (37.8) | 23 (43.4) | 5 (55.6) | 274** (69.2) | 131** (54.8) | 8** (47.1) |
| Blood group O (%) | 35* (71.4) | 16* (48.5) | 1* (11.1) | 257** (68.5) | 108** (49.3) | 9** (52.9) |
| VWF:Ag (IU/ml) | .20** [.09–.31] |
.23** [.20–.25] | .00** [.00–.04] | .37** [.23–.53] | .26** [.17–.36] | .00** [.00–.01] |
| VWF:CB (IU/ml) | .19** [.09–.35] |
.06** [.04–.08] |
.00** [.00, .02] | .42** [.23–.65] | .08** [.06–.14] | .00** [.00–.00] |
| VWF:Act (IU/ml) | .22** [.10–.35] |
.08** [.02–.09] | .00** [.00–.00] | .45** [.22–.70] | .08** [.04–.17] | .00** [.00–.00] |
| FVIII:C (IU/ml) | .49** [.26–.63] |
.28** [.22–.39] | .02** [.01–.03] | .66** [.48–.87] | .38** [.27–.49] | .01** [.01–.04] |
| Bleeding score | 5** [3–7] | 5** [2–10] | 18** [11–20] | 10** [5–15] | 12** [8–17] | 23** [16–26] |
| Comorbidity | 15 (20.3) | 11 (21.2) | 2 (22.2) | 169 (46.0) | 89 (39.9) | 8 (53.3) |
| Bleeding requiring treatment | 19* (25.7) | 23* (43.4) | 7* (77.8) | 89** (22.5) | 100** (41.8) | 14** (82.4) |
*p < .05 between types 1, 2, and 3 VWD. **p < .001 between types 1, 2, and 3 VWD. Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile ranges.
†Total bleeding score can range from ‐3 (i.e., no spontaneous bleeding symptoms, no bleeding after surgeries, teeth extractions and deliveries) to 37 or 45 (i.e., major bleeding for all symptoms) in males and females, respectively. , An abnormal bleeding score is defined as a total bleeding score ≥4 in both males and females. Higher scores correspond to more severe or frequent bleeding.
‡Comorbidity indicates the presence of at least one comorbidity defined as any disease or condition other than VWD that required medical attention from a general practitioner or specialist. ,
§The occurrence of bleeding episodes requiring treatment with desmopressin or factor concentrates in the year preceding inclusion in the study.
FIGURE 1Educational level of VWD patients compared to the general Dutch population. Data are presented as percentages. The distribution of educational level among patients aged ≥16 years differed significantly between the different VWD types and the general population (p = .005). Data considering educational level of the general Dutch population were provided by Statistics Netherlands and collected in 2008. GP = general population
Occupational disability
| VWD | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupational disability | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 |
|
| 325 (85.1) | 201 (87.8) | 13 (76.5) |
|
| 8 (2.1) | 3 (1.3) | 0 (.0) |
|
| 10 (2.6) | 3 (1.3) | 2 (11.8) |
|
| 7 (1.8) | 4 (1.7) | 0 (.0) |
|
| 32 (8.4) | 18 (7.9) | 2 (11.8) |
Occupational disability, both complete, partial and not attributed to VWD. Data are presented as frequency and percentages. The proportion of occupational disabled patients (partial and complete) did not differ significantly between the different VWD types (p = .340).
Days lost from school and/or work in the year prior to study inclusion
| Children (0–16 years) | Adults (16–99 years) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | |
| Total days lost from school and/or work |
1.0 [.0, 3.0] |
1.5 [.0, 4.0] |
6.0 [2.3, 9.0] |
.0 [.0, 2.0]* |
.0 [.0, 4.0]* |
4.0 [.0, 10.0]* |
| Days lost attributed to VWD |
.0 [.0, .8]* |
.0 [.0, 1.0]* |
3.0 [2.0, 4.0]* |
.0 [.0, .0]* |
.0 [.0, 1.0]* |
4.0 [.0, 10.0]* |
Data are presented as median and interquartile ranges. *p < .05 between types 1, 2, and 3 VWD.
FIGURE 2Percentage of female VWD patients with a low educational level for different points on the bleeding score item of menorrhagia. Data are presented as percentages. The proportion of female patients with a low educational level differed significantly between the different severities of menorrhagia (as measured by points on the bleeding score item of menorrhagia) (p = .015)