Literature DB >> 34963749

Diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: An update.

Ming Yang1, Chun-Ye Zhang2.   

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma accounts for the primary type of pancreatic cancer (PC) with a 5-year survival rate of only about 10% in the United States. Early diagnosis will improve chances for curative treatment. To date, a broadly used serum marker for PC diagnosis is carbohydrate antigen 19-9, which is the only approved biomarker currently by the United States Food and Drug Administration. However, it has low specificity; therefore, development of novel biomarkers is urgently needed. Clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate candidate biomarkers for PC diagnosis, and the use of a multi-biomarker panel with current PC diagnostic biomarkers appears promising. ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Clinical trials; Diagnosis; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Panel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34963749      PMCID: PMC8661384          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core Tip: The development of ideal diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic cancer (PC) is critically important for early diagnosis, large-scale screening, monitoring of therapeutic response, prediction of risk, and prognosis. So far, the only approved serum marker for PC diagnosis is carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in the United States; although, many potential biomarkers have been investigated. However, CA 19-9 has low sensitivity; hence, new solutions are needed. Herein, we summarize some of the ongoing clinical trials that aim to investigate the application of biomarkers in PC diagnosis.

TO THE EDITOR

We read with great interest a review paper recently published by O'Neill and Stoita[1], reviewing diagnostic biomarkers currently applied in pancreatic cancer (PC). The biomarkers are from serum, urinary, pancreatic, salivary, biliary, and fecal sources and comprise many different types of molecules. For example, serum biomarkers include proteins of glycolipids, growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, non-coding RNAs (long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs), and liquid biopsy (exosomes, circulating tumor DNA or ctDNA, and circulating tumor cells or CTCs)[1]. Moreover, we agree with the authors' suggestion that early diagnosis of PC improves chances for curative treatment. PC comprises two main subtypes, including the more common exocrine cancers and less common endocrine cancers. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for the primary type of PC, consisting of around 95% in exocrine cancers and about 90% in all PCs. The 5-year survival rate of PC is relatively low and was only 10% for all patients with PC in the United States from 2010 to 2016[2]. To date, the only approved serum marker for PC diagnosis is carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) in the United States, even though it has low specificity[3]. However, CA 19-9 is a non-PC-specific marker, shown to increase in colorectal, liver, lung, and ovarian cancers, as well as desmoplastic fibroblastoma[4,5]. Because of the low specificity of CA 19-9, a multi-marker panel that combines some of the currently investigated biomarkers (with CA 19-9) can be used to improve the specificity and sensitivity of PC diagnosis. For example, a multi-biomarker panel with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using three potential biomarkers, leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1, transthyretin, and CA 19-9, improved the diagnosis of PDAC in normal pancreas and benign pancreatic disease and other tumors[6]. Although a multi-biomarker panel provides a better approach for early PC diagnosis, some limitations, including cost, the requirement for large sample volumes, good technique and analytical performance, and practical feasibility, may impact their broad application[3,7,8]. In addition, many of the biomarkers discussed in the abovementioned paper, including extracellular matrix-associated proteins such as matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, profibrotic factors such as transforming growth factor-beta, growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor, cell-cell interacting protein such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and microRNAs such as mi-R21, are not specific markers implicated in many other cancers and diseases[9-12]. Furthermore, germline mutations in genes such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A, tumor protein p53, serine/threonine kinase ATM, MutL homolog 1, and breast cancer 1 and 2 have been significantly associated with PC[13]. The authors also mentioned genetic factors associated with PC, such as KRAS in ctDNA and KRAS mutation in CTCs. Therefore, genetic mutation or inherited factors may be a predisposing factor for PC and should be considered during the diagnosis. Finally, this letter summarizes the actively recruiting and completed clinical trials to evaluate diagnostic methods or biomarkers for PC (Table 1). The data were collected from the website https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on July 18, 2021) using the keywords biomarkers and PC. Overall, the specificity and sensitivity of PC diagnosis can be increased by using multiple marker panels in combination with CA 19-9 or with novel screened biomarkers. In addition, accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and ease of application together will ensure the broad application of any new diagnostic method.
Table 1

Clinical trials for pancreatic cancer with representative diagnostic biomarkers

Trial number
Biomarkers
Status
Year to complete
Results/Trial titles
NCT03311776HA and PRO-C3Completed2035Serum HA and PRO-C3 were prognostic for overall survival in patients with PC[14]
NCT04241367ctDNARecruiting2025Verification of predictive biomarkers for pancreatic cancer treatment using multicenter liquid biopsy
NCT04143152sTRA and CA 19-9Recruiting2023Two biomarker panels with sTRA and CA 19-9 improved sensitivity and accuracy, compared to using only CA19-9[15]
NCT03404661Methylated DNA markers Recruiting2023Optical and biochemical biomarkers in early pancreatic cancer significance: a prospective study
NCT04584996CircRNAsRecruiting2023Circular and non-coding RNAs as clinically useful biomarkers in pancreaticobiliary cancers
NCT04636788Circulating exosomal small RNAsRecruiting2022Diagnostic and prognostic values of EUS-FNA specimens and circulating exosomal small RNA in patients with pancreatic cancer
NCT03536793Urinary tissue factor and Endo180Recruiting2022Study of uTF and Endo180 as markers of early malignancy in cystic pancreatic lesions
NCT04549064AREGRecruiting2021Identification of AREG for the detection of pancreatic cancer by the biosensor
NCT03817866Chromogranin A Recruiting2021To validate the performance of Brahms Chromogranin A II Kryptor assay to monitor the course of disease in patients with well-defined gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
NCT03214991DNAUnknown2021Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic marker in patients with pancreatic cancer
NCT01664169VEGF-A and VEGF-R2Completed2018Validation of circulating biomarkers using the immunological multiparameter chip technology (IMPACT) platform on plasma specimens collected on CALGB 80303
NCT02974764Circulating tumor cells Completed2018Alterations in circulating tumor cells predicted the progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, treatment response, and clinical outcomes[16]
NCT00674973AREG, EGF, sHER2, TGF-α Completed2015Exploratory analyses suggested that high AREG might predict progression-free survival in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib[17]
NCT01675258Four messenger RNA biomarkers (KRAS, MBD3L2, ACRV1, and DPM1) in salivary samplesCompleted2013The logistic regression model using four biomarkers yielded an area under the curve value of 0.971 (cutoff 0.433) to detect resectable pancreatic cancer with 90.0% sensitivity and 95.0% specificity[18]
NCT00899158Caspase-3 and pAkt in muscle, and urinary 3-MHCompleted2008Role of caspase-3, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, and 3-methylhistidine in the pathophysiology of skeletal muscle loss in weight-losing pancreas cancer patients

ACRV1: Acrosomal vesicle protein 1; AREG: Amphiregulin; DPM1: Dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1; EGF: Epidermal growth factor; circRNAs: Circular RNAs; ctDNA: Circulating tumor DNA; HA: Hyaluronan; MBD3L2: Methyl-CpG binding domain protein 3 like 2; pAkt: Phosphorylated Akt; PRO-C3: Propeptide of type III collagen; sHER2: Soluble human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; sTRA: Sialylated tumor-related antigen; TGF-α: Transforming growth factor-alpha; 3-MH: 3-methylhistidine.

Clinical trials for pancreatic cancer with representative diagnostic biomarkers ACRV1: Acrosomal vesicle protein 1; AREG: Amphiregulin; DPM1: Dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase subunit 1; EGF: Epidermal growth factor; circRNAs: Circular RNAs; ctDNA: Circulating tumor DNA; HA: Hyaluronan; MBD3L2: Methyl-CpG binding domain protein 3 like 2; pAkt: Phosphorylated Akt; PRO-C3: Propeptide of type III collagen; sHER2: Soluble human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; sTRA: Sialylated tumor-related antigen; TGF-α: Transforming growth factor-alpha; 3-MH: 3-methylhistidine.
  18 in total

1.  Multi-biomarker panel prediction model for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Doo-Ho Lee; Woongchang Yoon; Areum Lee; Youngmin Han; Yoonhyeong Byun; Jae Seung Kang; Hongbeom Kim; Wooil Kwon; Young-Ah Suh; Yonghwan Choi; Junghyun Namkung; Sangjo Han; Sung Gon Yi; Jin Seok Heo; In Woong Han; Joon Oh Park; Joo Kyung Park; Song Cheol Kim; Eunsung Jun; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jin Lee; Hyeon Kook Lee; Huisong Lee; Seungyeoun Lee; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu Eun Lee; Wonshik Han; Taesung Park; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 7.027

2.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Association Between Inherited Germline Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Chunling Hu; Steven N Hart; Eric C Polley; Rohan Gnanaolivu; Hermela Shimelis; Kun Y Lee; Jenna Lilyquist; Jie Na; Raymond Moore; Samuel O Antwi; William R Bamlet; Kari G Chaffee; John DiCarlo; Zhong Wu; Raed Samara; Pashtoon M Kasi; Robert R McWilliams; Gloria M Petersen; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Salivary transcriptomic biomarkers for detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; James J Farrell; Hui Zhou; David Elashoff; David Akin; No-Hee Park; David Chia; David T Wong
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  The role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in cancer liver metastasis.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Chunye Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Circulating Tumor Cells Dynamics in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Correlate With Disease Status: Results of the Prospective CLUSTER Study.

Authors:  Georgios Gemenetzis; Vincent P Groot; Jun Yu; Ding Ding; Jonathan A Teinor; Ammar A Javed; Laura D Wood; Richard A Burkhart; John L Cameron; Martin A Makary; Matthew J Weiss; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Phase II, randomized, biomarker identification trial (MARK) for erlotinib in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  D Propper; I Davidenko; J Bridgewater; L Kupcinskas; A Fittipaldo; C Hillenbach; B Klughammer; M Ducreux
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  A novel combined score of biomarkers in sputum may be an indicator for lung cancer: A pilot study.

Authors:  Amir Bar-Shai; Shani Shenhar-Tsarfaty; Alon Ahimor; Noa Ophir; Michal Rotem; Yifat Alcalay; Elizabeth Fireman
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.786

9.  Serum Dickkopf-1 in Combined with CA 19-9 as a Biomarker of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Si-Young Kim; Hee-Seung Lee; Seung-Min Bang; Dai-Hoon Han; Ho-Kyoung Hwang; Gi-Hong Choi; Moon-Jae Chung; Seung-Up Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Diagnostic performance enhancement of pancreatic cancer using proteomic multimarker panel.

Authors:  Jiyoung Park; Yonghwan Choi; Junghyun Namkung; Sung Gon Yi; Hyunsoo Kim; Jiyoung Yu; Yongkang Kim; Min-Seok Kwon; Wooil Kwon; Do-Youn Oh; Sun-Whe Kim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Wonshik Han; Kyu Eun Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Joon Oh Park; Joo Kyung Park; Song Cheol Kim; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jin Lee; Seungyeoun Lee; Sangjo Han; Taesung Park; Jin-Young Jang; Youngsoo Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-16
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Crosstalk between gut microbiota and COVID-19 impacts pancreatic cancer progression.

Authors:  Chun-Ye Zhang; Shuai Liu; Ming Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.