| Literature DB >> 34963658 |
Yuanyuan Li1, Junfang Xu2, Yuxuan Gu2, Xueshan Sun2, Hengjin Dong2, Changgui Chen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth leading cause of tumor-related deaths worldwide. Estimates of the EC burden are necessary and could offer evidence-based suggestions for local cancer control.Entities:
Keywords: disability-adjusted life year; disease burden; economic burden; esophageal cancer
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34963658 PMCID: PMC8928052 DOI: 10.2196/33191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill ISSN: 2369-2960
Predicted prevalence of esophageal cancer and the number of people diagnosed with esophageal cancer from 2013 to 2030 in China, by sex.
| Year | Males | Females | Total | |||||
|
| Prevalence (per 100,000) | Cases, n | Prevalence (per 100,000) | Cases, n | Prevalence (per 100,000) | Cases, n | ||
| 2013 | 82.0 | 575,500 | 38.9 | 260,100 | 61.0 | 835,600 | ||
| 2014 | 86.1 | 607,600 | 40.4 | 270,900 | 63.8 | 878,500 | ||
| 2015 | 89.0 | 631,100 | 41.1 | 277,000 | 65.6 | 908,100 | ||
| 2016 | 91.1 | 648,600 | 41.3 | 279,900 | 66.8 | 928,500 | ||
| 2017 | 92.4 | 661,900 | 41.1 | 280,500 | 67.4 | 942,300 | ||
| 2018 | 93.4 | 672,300 | 40.7 | 279,400 | 67.7 | 951,600 | ||
| 2019 | 94.3 | 680,600 | 40.2 | 277,100 | 67.9 | 957,700 | ||
| 2020 | 94.9 | 687,100 | 39.6 | 273,800 | 67.9 | 961,000 | ||
| 2021 | 95.3 | 691,800 | 38.9 | 269,800 | 67.7 | 961,500 | ||
| 2022 | 95.6 | 695,500 | 38.1 | 265,300 | 67.5 | 960,700 | ||
| 2023 | 95.8 | 698,500 | 37.3 | 260,500 | 67.2 | 959,000 | ||
| 2024 | 95.9 | 701,100 | 36.5 | 255,600 | 66.8 | 956,600 | ||
| 2025 | 96.0 | 703,400 | 35.6 | 250,500 | 66.4 | 953,900 | ||
| 2026 | 96.1 | 704,700 | 34.8 | 245,300 | 66.0 | 950,000 | ||
| 2027 | 96.2 | 705,700 | 34.0 | 240,000 | 65.7 | 945,700 | ||
| 2028 | 96.3 | 706,500 | 33.2 | 234,700 | 65.3 | 941,200 | ||
| 2029 | 96.4 | 707,100 | 32.4 | 229,500 | 64.9 | 936,500 | ||
| 2030 | 96.4 | 707,500 | 31.6 | 224,300 | 64.5 | 931,800 | ||
Figure 1The predicted disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of esophageal cancer by sex from 2013 to 2030. YLL: years of life lost; YLD: years lived with a disability; AGR: annual growth rate.
Figure 2The predicted changing trend of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to esophageal cancer from 2013 to 2030 in China, by sex. In all 3 graphs, the Annual Percent Change (APC) and the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) are significantly different from zero at α=.05 level.
Figure 3Estimated total annual direct medical expenditure of esophageal cancer from 2013 to 2030 in China, by sex.
Changes in the estimated cumulative direct medical expenditure (DME) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of esophageal cancer in males in China according to the key parameters considered in the sensitivity analyses.
| Parameter | Changes in estimated DME, billions (%) | Changes in estimated DALYs, thousands (%) | ||||||
|
| 2030 | 2025 | 2020 | 2030 | 2025 | 2020 | ||
| Baseline value | 741.7 | 475.2 | 261.9 | 49957.5 | 35889.7 | 22037.9 | ||
|
| ||||||||
|
| 0.0475 instead of 0.0432 | 33.1 (4.5) | 14.8 (3.1) | 4.9 (1.7) | NCb | NC | NC | |
|
| 0.0388 instead of 0.0432 | –32.2 (–4.3) | –14.7 (–3.1) | –4.9 (–1.9) | NC | NC | NC | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 0.208 instead of 0.199 | 12.3 (1.7) | 7.2 (1.5) | 3.3 (1.3) | –130.8 (–0.3) | –139.3 (–0.4) | –135.9 (–0.6) | |
|
| 0.190 instead of 0.199 | –12.4 (–1.7) | -7.3 (-1.5) | –3.4 (–1.3) | 131.0 (0.3) | 139.9 (0.4) | 137.5 (0.6) | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 1.47 instead of 1.33 | –2.7 (–0.4) | –1.2 (–0.3) | –0.4 (–0.2) | –146.0 (–0.3) | –71.5 (–0.2) | –24.4 (–0.1) | |
|
| 1.20 instead of 1.33 | 2.8 (0.4) | 1.2 (0.3) | 0.4 (0.2) | 153.2 (0.3) | 74.9 (0.2) | 25.5 (0.1) | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| High estimatesc | 2.6 (0.4) | 0.3 (0.1) | NC | 107.2 (0.2) | 12.14 (0.0) | NC | |
|
| Low estimatesc | –2.6 (–0.4) | –0.3 (–0.1) | NC | –107.6 (–0.2) | -12.2 (0.0) | NC | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| High estimatesd | –0.1 (0.0) | –0.01 (0.0) | NC | –5 (0.0) | –0.5 (0.0) | NC | |
|
| Low estimatesd | 0.1 (0.0) | NC | NC | 5.0 (0.0) | 0.6 (0.0) | NC | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 1.04 instead of 0.95 | NC | NC | NC | –1.2 (0.0) | 0.7 (0.0) | –0.2 (0.0) | |
|
| 0.85 instead of 0.94 | NC | NC | NC | 1.5 (0.0) | –0.6 (0.0) | 0.2 (0.0) | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 0.435 instead of 0.395 | NC | NC | NC | 393.2 (0.8) | 284.0 (0.8) | 176.1 (0.8) | |
|
| 0.356 instead of 0.395 | NC | NC | NC | –393.2 (–0.8) | –284.0 (–0.8) | –176.1 (–0.8) | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| High estimatese | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |
|
| Low estimatese | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |
aAAGR: average annual growth rate.
bNC: no changes in estimated costs or DALYs.
cSee Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1.
dSee Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1.
eSee Table S4 in Multimedia Appendix 1.
Changes in the estimated cumulative costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of esophageal cancer (EC) in females in China according to the key parameters considered in the sensitivity analyses.
| Parameter | Changes in estimated cost, billions(%) | Changes in estimated DALYs, thousands (%) | ||||||||||
|
| 2030 | 2025 | 2020 | 2030 | 2025 | 2020 | ||||||
| Baseline value | 279.5 | 191.1 | 111.7 | 17687.7 | 13382.4 | 8628.1 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 0.0475 instead of 0.0432 | 11.8 (4.2) | 5.8 (3.0) | 2.0 (1.8) | NCc | NC | NC | |||||
|
| 0.0388 instead of 0.0432 | –11.4 (–4.1) | –5.7 (–3.0) | –2.0 (–1.8) | NC | NC | NC | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| –0.016 instead of –0.025 | 18.3 (6.5) | 7.7 (4.0) | 2.1 (1.9) | 873.3 (5.0) | 402.4 (3.0) | 109.1 (1.3) | |||||
|
| –0.035 instead of –0.025 | –18.4 (–6.6) | –8.0 (–4.2) | –2.2 (–2.0) | –891.9 (–5.0) | –422.9 (–3.2) | –117.9 (–1.4) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| –0.011 instead of –0.027 | NC | NC | NC | 0.9 (0.0) | 0.4 (0.0) | 0.1 (0.0) | |||||
|
| –0.042 instead of –0.027 | NC | NC | NC | –0.8 (0.0) | –0.3 (0.0) | –0.1 (0.0) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 0.208 instead of 0.199 | 6.9 (2.5) | 4.2 (2.2) | 2.0 (1.8) | –57.9 (–0.3) | –71.8 (–0.5) | –77.5 (–0.9) | |||||
|
| 0.190 instead of 0.199 | –6.4 (–2.3) | –4.0 (–2.1) | –1.9 (–1.7) | 53.3 (0.3) | 66.6 (0.5) | 72.9 (0.8) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 1.47 instead of 1.33 | 1.0 (0.4) | 0.8 (0.2) | 0.2 (0.2) | 51.2 (0.3) | 27.0 (0.2) | 10.0 (0.1) | |||||
|
| 1.20 instead of 1.33 | –1.1 (–0.4) | –0.5 (–0.3) | –0.2 (–0.2) | –53.3 (–0.3) | –28.1 (–0.2) | –10.3 (–0.1) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| High estimatese | 0.7 (0.3) | 0.1 (0.1) | NC | 27.0 (0.2) | 3.2 (0.0) | NC | |||||
|
| Low estimatese | –0.7 (–0.3) | –0.1 (–0.1) | NC | –27.2 (–0.2) | –3.2 (0.0) | NC | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| High estimatesf | NC | NC | NC | –1.2 (–0.0) | –0.1 (0.0) | NC | |||||
|
| Low estimatesf | NC | NC | NC | 1.2 (0.0) | 0.1 (0.0) | NC | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 1.04 instead of 0.95 | NC | NC | NC | 0.4 (0.0) | 0.19 (0.0) | 0.1 (0.0) | |||||
|
| 0.85 instead of 0.94 | NC | NC | NC | –0.5 (0.0) | –0.2 (0.0) | –0.1 (0.0) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 0.435 instead of 0.395 | NC | NC | NC | 147.6 (0.8) | 112.3 (0.9) | 73.3 (0.9) | |||||
|
| 0.356 instead of 0.395 | NC | NC | NC | –147.6 (–0.8) | –112.3 (–0.8) | –73.3 (–0.9) | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| High estimatese | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||||
|
| Low estimatese | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||||
aAAGR: average annual growth rate.
bDME: direct medical expenditure.
cNC: no changes in estimated costs or DALYs.
dAAPC: average annual percentage change.
eSee Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1.
fSee Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1.