Literature DB >> 34961398

Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.

JoNell Strough1, Eric R Stone2, Andrew M Parker3, Wändi Bruine de Bruin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global aging has increased the reliance on surrogates to make health care decisions for others. We investigated the differences between making health care decisions and predicting health care decisions, self-other differences for made and predicted health care decisions, and the roles of perceived social norms, emotional closeness, empathy, age, and gender.
METHODS: Participants (N = 2037) from a nationally representative US panel were randomly assigned to make or to predict a health care decision. They were also randomly assigned to 1 of 5 recipients: themselves, a loved one 60 y or older, a loved one younger than 60 y, a distant acquaintance 60 y or older, or a distant acquaintance younger than 60 y. Hypothetical health care scenarios depicted choices between relatively safe lower-risk treatments with a good chance of yielding mild health improvements versus higher-risk treatments that offered a moderate chance of substantial health improvements. Participants reported their likelihood of choosing lower- versus higher-risk treatments, their perceptions of family and friends' approval of risky health care decisions, and their empathy.
RESULTS: We present 3 key findings. First, made decisions involved less risk taking than predicted decisions, especially for distant others. Second, predicted decisions were similar for others and oneself, but made decisions were less risk taking for others than oneself. People predicted that loved ones would be less risk taking than distant others would be. Third, perceived social norms were more strongly associated than empathy with made and predicted decisions. LIMITATIONS: Hypothetical scenarios may not adequately represent emotional processes in health care decision making.
CONCLUSIONS: Perceived social norms may sway people to take less risk in health care decisions, especially when making decisions for others. These findings have implications for improving surrogate decision making. HIGHLIGHTS: People made less risky health care decisions for others than for themselves, even though they predicted others would make decisions similar to their own. This has implications for understanding how surrogates apply the substituted judgment standard when making decisions for patients.Perceived social norms were more strongly related to decisions than treatment-recipient (relationship closeness, age) and decision-maker (age, gender, empathy) characteristics. Those who perceived that avoiding health care risks was valued by their social group were less likely to choose risky medical treatments.Understanding the power of perceived social norms in shaping surrogates' decisions may help physicians to engage surrogates in shared decision making.Knowledge of perceived social norms may facilitate the design of decision aids for surrogates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care; medical decisions; social norms; surrogate decisions

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34961398      PMCID: PMC8923988          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211067223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  43 in total

1.  Measuring peer socialization for adolescent substance use: a comparison of perceived and actual friends' substance use effects.

Authors:  Arielle R Deutsch; Pavel Chernyavskiy; Douglas Steinley; Wendy S Slutske
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

Authors:  Yaacov Trope; Nira Liberman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Andrea M Angott; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

4.  Don't Risk It. Older Adults Perceive Fewer Future Opportunities and Avoid Social Risk Taking.

Authors:  Rebecca K Delaney; JoNell Strough; Natalie J Shook; Cameron G Ford; Philip Lemaster
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2020-01-22

5.  Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults.

Authors:  M L Hummert; T A Garstka; J L Shaner; S Strahm
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-09

6.  Valuing health for oneself versus one's child or elderly parent.

Authors:  Aaron E Carroll; Chandan Saha; Susan Ofner; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2017-06-04

7.  Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Doris Barwich; Deb Pichora; Peter Dodek; Francois Lamontagne; John J You; Carolyn Tayler; Pat Porterfield; Tasnim Sinuff; Jessica Simon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do.

Authors:  W D Smucker; R M Houts; J H Danks; P H Ditto; A Fagerlin; K M Coppola
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Interventions to Reduce Ageism Against Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Burnes; Christine Sheppard; Charles R Henderson; Monica Wassel; Richenda Cope; Chantal Barber; Karl Pillemer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Nurse-led intervention to improve surrogate decision making for patients with advanced critical illness.

Authors:  Douglas B White; Sarah Martin Cua; Roberta Walk; Laura Pollice; Lisa Weissfeld; Seoyeon Hong; C Seth Landefeld; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.