| Literature DB >> 34960854 |
Shang-Ta Wang1, Yi-Ying Lu1, Min-Lang Tsai1.
Abstract
Spray-dried chitosan/NaCl/maltodextrin microparticles have the potential to be used to enhance saltiness; however, its notable hygroscopicity results in handling and storage problems, thus limiting its application. In the present study, we attempted to introduce maltodextrin, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), and waxy starch (WS) as excipients into the spray drying formulation of microparticles to reduce the cohesiveness and caking behavior and improve the yield simultaneously by ameliorating the moisture absorption tendency. The prepared microparticles showed a spherical appearance and had particle sizes ranging from 6.29 to 7.64 μm, while the sizes of the NaCl crystals embedded in the microparticles were 0.36 to 1.24 μm. The crystalline reflections of WS and MCC were retained in the microparticles after the spray-drying process. The handling properties were assessed to be acceptable. The formulation with only maltodextrin as the excipient showed a high moisture absorption rate of 2.83 g/100 g·h and a caking strength of 3.27 kg. The addition of MCC and WS significantly reduced the hygroscopic rate and caking strength. The spray-dried products provided better saltiness perception than native NaCl; as such, they may be promising for seasoning dry food products to achieve sodium intake reduction in the food industry.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; crystalline carbohydrates; hygroscopicity; saltiness perception; sodium reduction; spray drying
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960854 PMCID: PMC8706731 DOI: 10.3390/polym13244302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
The composition (%, w/w) of each formulation.
| NaCl | Chitosan | Maltodextrin | Microcrystalline Cellulose | Waxy Maize Starch | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNM | 30.6 | 4.3 | 65.1 | 0 | 0 |
| MCC10 | 27.2 | 3.8 | 58.0 | 11.0 | 0 |
| MCC15 | 25.5 | 3.7 | 54.5 | 16.3 | 0 |
| MCC20 | 23.9 | 3.5 | 51.0 | 21.6 | 0 |
| WS10 | 27.2 | 3.8 | 58.0 | 0 | 11.0 |
| WS15 | 25.5 | 3.7 | 54.5 | 0 | 16.3 |
| WS20 | 23.9 | 3.5 | 51.0 | 0 | 21.6 |
CNM indicates the formulation with only maltodextrin as the excipient. MCC indicates the formulations with maltodextrin and microcrystalline cellulose as the excipients. WS indicates the formulations with maltodextrin and waxy maize starch as the excipients.
The yields, moisture, acetic acid, and NaCl content of chitosan/NaCl/maltodextrin microparticles.
| Yield (%) | Moisture Content (%) | NaCl Content (%) | Acetic Acid Content (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNM | 55.65 | 7.37 ± 0.68 c | 27.69 ± 0.55 bc | 2.00 ± 0.28 a |
| MCC10 | 43.88 | 5.18 ± 0.90 a | 27.69 ± 0.55 bc | 2.40 ± 0.49 a |
| MCC15 | 43.60 | 5.04 ± 0.91 a | 28.86 ± 0.73 c | 2.20 ± 0.28 a |
| MCC20 | 44.80 | 6.12 ± 0.30 abc | 26.72 ± 0.28 ab | 2.10 ± 0.24 a |
| WS10 | 40.83 | 5.82 ± 0.32 ab | 28.47 ± 1.46 c | 1.60 ± 0.28 a |
| WS15 | 44.21 | 5.35 ± 0.47 ab | 27.69 ± 0.55 bc | 1.90 ± 0.14 a |
| WS20 | 39.29 | 6.68 ± 0.24 bc | 25.35 ± 0.28 a | 1.60 ± 0.28 a |
The abbreviations of the groups are the same as in Table 1. The data except the yield values are expressed as mean values ± S.D. (n = 3). a–c Values with different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s new multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of spray-dried chitosan/NaCl/maltodextrin microparticles with different formulations. (A) CNM; (B) MCC10; (C) MCC15; (D) MCC20; (E) WS10; (F) WS15; (G) WS20. The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are described in Table 1.
The average particle size of the whole spray dried microparticles and embedded NaCl crystals.
| Microparticles (μm) | NaCl Crystals (μm) | |
|---|---|---|
| CNM | 6.79 ± 2.57 a | 0.36 ± 0.12 a |
| MCC10 | 6.29 ± 1.97 a | 0.43 ± 0.11 ab |
| MCC15 | 6.94 ± 2.75 a | 0.48 ± 0.16 ab |
| MCC20 | 7.03 ± 3.37 a | 0.49 ± 0.13 b |
| WS10 | 7.64 ± 2.20 b | 1.24 ± 0.36 d |
| WS15 | 6.76 ± 2.58 a | 0.66 ± 0.25 c |
| WS20 | 7.02 ± 2.19 ab | 0.63 ± 0.19 c |
The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are the same as in Table 1. Data were expressed as mean values ± S.D. (n ≥ 80). a–d Values with different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s new multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2X-ray diffraction patterns of (A) NaCl; (B) maltodextrin; (C) chitosan; (D) CMN; (E) MCC alone; (F) MCC10; (G) MCC15; (H) MCC20; (I) WS alone; (J) WS10; (K) WS15; (L) WS 20. The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are the same as in Table 1.
The bulk density, tapped density, and flowability indices of chitosan/NaCl/maltodextrin microparticles.
| Bulk Density | Tapped Density | Flowability | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hausner Ratio | Carr Index | |||
| CNM | 0.29 ± 0.02 b | 0.34 ± 0.01 a | 1.33 ± 0.03 ab | 24.68 ± 1.49 ab |
| MCC10 | 0.28 ± 0.00 b | 0.37 ± 0.01 ab | 1.19 ± 0.04 a | 15.60 ± 2.77 a |
| MCC15 | 0.29 ± 0.02 b | 0.36 ± 0.02 ab | 1.23 ± 0.00 ab | 18.90 ± 0.23 a |
| MCC20 | 0.32 ± 0.02 c | 0.40 ± 0.01 bc | 1.25 ± 0.08 ab | 19.90 ± 5.27 ab |
| WS10 | 0.24 ± 0.01 a | 0.35 ± 0.05 a | 1.43 ± 0.18 b | 28.87 ± 8.71 b |
| WS15 | 0.28 ± 0.01 b | 0.38 ± 0.01 abc | 1.37 ± 0.06 ab | 27.04 ± 3.25 b |
| WS20 | 0.34 ± 0.00 c | 0.42 ± 0.00 c | 1.24 ± 0.01 ab | 19.50 ± 0.70 b |
The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are the same as in Table 1. Data were expressed as mean values ± S.D. (n = 3). a–c Values with different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s new multiple range test (p < 0.05).
The hygroscopic rate and caking strength of chitosan/NaCl/maltodextrin microparticles.
| Hygroscopic Rate | Hygroscopic Rate | Caking Strength (kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNM | 4.45 ± 0.14 c | 2.83 ± 0.10 c | 3.27 ± 0.21 ab |
| MCC10 | 3.80 ± 0.55 bc | 2.52 ± 0.17 b | 2.91 ± 0.21 bc |
| MCC15 | 3.94 ± 0.10 ab | 2.33 ± 0.16 a | 2.97 ± 0.29 ab |
| MCC20 | 3.74 ± 0.07 a | 2.33 ± 0.05 a | 2.57 ± 0.26 a |
| WS10 | 4.19 ± 0.10 bc | 2.59 ± 0.05 b | 4.42 ± 0.38 c |
| WS15 | 4.09 ± 0.11 b | 2.56 ± 0.11 b | 3.79 ± 0.20 bc |
| WS20 | 3.69 ± 0.28 a | 2.32 ± 0.12 a | 3.26 ± 0.28 ab |
The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are the same as in Table 1. Data from hygroscopic rate (n = 3) and caking strength (n = 2) were expressed as mean values ± S.D. a–c Values with different superscripts in the same column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s new multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Conductivity–time curves of chitosan/NaCl/maltodextrin microparticles. The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are the same as in Table 1.
Figure 4The sensory evaluation results of ground NaCl and each experimental group in the dry food system. The abbreviations and compositions of each formulation are the same as in Table 1. a–c Values with different superscripts indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s new multiple range test (p < 0.05).