| Literature DB >> 34960095 |
Ben Li1,2, Yue Huang1,2, Cheng Luo1,2, Xiaolin Peng1,2,3, Yang Jiao2, Li Zhou1,2, Jiawei Yin1,2, Liegang Liu1,2.
Abstract
Molybdenum has been found to be associated with metabolic disorders. However, the relationship between molybdenum and metabolic syndrome (MetS) is still unclear. A large case-control study was conducted in a Chinese population from the baseline of Ezhou-Shenzhen cohort. A total of 5356 subjects were included with 2678 MetS and 2678 controls matched by sex and age (±2 years). Medians (IQRs) of plasma molybdenum concentrations were 1.24 μg/L for MetS cases and 1.46 μg/L for controls. After adjustment for multiple covariates, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MetS were 1.00 (reference), 0.71 (0.59-0.84), 0.56 (0.46-0.68), and 0.47 (0.39-0.58) across quartiles of plasma molybdenum, and per SD increment of log-transformed molybdenum was associated with a 23% lower risk of MetS. In the spline analysis, the risk of MetS and its components decreased steeply with increasing molybdenum and followed by a plateau when the cutoff point was observed around 2.0 μg/L. The dose-dependent relationship of molybdenum with MetS remained consistent when considering other essential elements in the Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) model. In our study, higher plasma molybdenum was significantly associated with a lower risk of MetS, as well as its components, in a dose-response manner.Entities:
Keywords: case-control study; dose-response relationship; metabolic syndrome; molybdenum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960095 PMCID: PMC8707707 DOI: 10.3390/nu13124544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics | MetS ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 54.5 (10.9) | 54.8 (10.8) | 0.286 |
| Male, | 1478 (55.2) | 1478 (55.2) | 1.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.88 (2.99) | 24.36 (2.78) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 90.33 (7.84) | 84.60 (8.19) | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 98.26 (6.31) | 95.19 (6.28) | <0.001 |
| Waist/hip ratio | 0.92 (0.05) | 0.89 (0.06) | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 137.78 (20.14) | 127.69 (19.85) | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 82.80 (11.70) | 76.96 (10.98) | <0.001 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.76 (5.23–6.30) | 5.15 (4.80–5.51) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.89 (1.41–2.55) | 1.15 (0.88–1.48) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.99 (4.36–5.71) | 4.94 (4.37–5.59) | 0.137 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.20 (0.33) | 1.43 (0.36) | <0.001 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.95 (0.94) | 2.99 (0.90) | 0.127 |
| Smoking, | 0.750 | ||
| Current | 622 (23.3) | 602 (22.6) | |
| Former | 277 (10.4) | 270 (7.8) | |
| Never | 1772 (66.3) | 1796 (67.3) | |
| Drinking, | 0.691 | ||
| Current | 692 (26.0) | 714 (26.8) | |
| Former | 198 (7.4) | 205 (7.7) | |
| Never | 1775 (66.6) | 1744 (65.5) | |
| Physical activity, | 0.111 | ||
| Yes | 1469 (55.3) | 1521 (57.4) | |
| No | 1189 (44.7) | 1127 (42.6) | |
| Family history of diabetes, | <0.001 | ||
| Yes | 335 (12.7) | 256 (9.7) | |
| No | 2310 (87.3) | 2390 (90.3) | |
| Educational levels, | 0.414 | ||
| None or elementary school | 611 (23.0) | 631 (23.8) | |
| Middle school | 1160 (43.7) | 1180 (44.5) | |
| High school or college | 885 (33.3) | 838 (31.6) | |
| Molybdenum (μg/L) | 1.24 (0.85–1.70) | 1.46 (1.05–1.97) | <0.001 |
Note: BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein. Data are presented as n (%) for categorical data, means (standard deviations) for parametrically distributed data, or medians (interquartile ranges) for nonparametrically distributed data. a Missing number was 17, b Missing number was 28, c Missing number was 50, d Missing number was 65, e Missing number was 51.
Association of plasma molybdenum concentrations with MetS and its components.
| Variables | Quartiles of Plasma Molybdenum Concentrations (μg/L) | Per SD of Log–Transformed Molybdenum |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (≤1.05) | Q2 (1.05–1.46) | Q3 (1.46–1.97) | Q4 (≥1.97) | |||
| MetS | ||||||
| No. of cases/controls | 1018/669 | 678/670 | 555/670 | 427/669 | ||
| Crude OR | 1.00 | 0.66 (0.57–0.76) | 0.52 (0.45–0.61) | 0.40 (0.34–0.48) | 0.71 (0.67–0.76) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 a | 1.00 | 0.67 (0.58–0.79) | 0.55 (0.47–0.65) | 0.43 (0.36–0.51) | 0.73 (0.69–0.78) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 b | 1.00 | 0.70 (0.59–0.82) | 0.58 (0.49–0.69) | 0.47 (0.39–0.57) | 0.76 (0.71–0.82) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 c | 1.00 | 0.71 (0.59–0.84) | 0.56 (0.46–0.68) | 0.47 (0.39–0.58) | 0.77 (0.71–0.83) | <0.001 |
| Abdominal obesity | ||||||
| No. of cases/controls | 1108/569 | 867/473 | 721/501 | 624/471 | ||
| Crude OR | 1.00 | 0.94 (0.81–1.10) | 0.74 (0.64–0.86) | 0.68 (0.58–0.80) | 0.88 (0.84–0.94) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 a | 1.00 | 0.86 (0.73–1.01) | 0.69 (0.59–0.81) | 0.66 (0.56–0.77) | 0.87 (0.82–0.92) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 b | 1.00 | 0.77 (0.65–0.91) | 0.56 (0.48–0.67) | 0.51 (0.43–0.61) | 0.77 (0.72–0.82) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 c | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.67–0.95) | 0.57 (0.48–0.68) | 0.53 (0.43–0.64) | 0.79 (0.74–0.85) | <0.001 |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | ||||||
| No. of cases/controls | 872/815 | 587/760 | 485/738 | 420/676 | ||
| Crude OR | 1.00 | 0.72 (0.63–0.83) | 0.61 (0.53–0.71) | 0.58 (0.50–0.68) | 0.81 (0.77–0.86) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 a | 1.00 | 0.74 (0.64–0.85) | 0.64 (0.55–0.75) | 0.60 (0.51–0.70) | 0.82 (0.78–0.87) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 b | 1.00 | 0.74 (0.63–0.86) | 0.66 (0.56–0.77) | 0.61 (0.52–0.72) | 0.82 (0.78–0.88) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 c | 1.00 | 0.76 (0.65–0.88) | 0.67 (0.56–0.79) | 0.64 (0.53–0.76) | 0.84 (0.79–0.90) | <0.001 |
| Low HDL–C | ||||||
| No. of cases/controls | 591/1096 | 481/867 | 389/835 | 318/777 | ||
| Crude OR | 1.00 | 1.03 (0.89–1.20) | 0.86 (0.74–1.01) | 0.76 (0.64–0.90) | 0.90 (0.85–0.96) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 a | 1.00 | 0.98 (0.84–1.14) | 0.87 (0.74–1.03) | 0.78 (0.65–0.92) | 0.91 (0.85–0.96) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 b | 1.00 | 0.92 (0.79–1.09) | 0.79 (0.67–0.94) | 0.70 (0.58–0.84) | 0.86 (0.81–0.92) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 c | 1.00 | 0.89 (0.75–1.06) | 0.77 (0.64–0.92) | 0.68 (0.56–0.82) | 0.85 (0.79–0.91) | <0.001 |
| High blood pressure | ||||||
| No. of cases/controls | 1127/488 | 822/501 | 726/485 | 644/438 | ||
| Crude OR | 1.00 | 0.71 (0.61–0.83) | 0.65 (0.55–0.76) | 0.64 (0.54–0.75) | 0.85 (0.80–0.90) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 a | 1.00 | 0.75 (0.63–0.88) | 0.66 (0.56–0.78) | 0.63 (0.53–0.75) | 0.85 (0.80–0.91) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 b | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.68–0.95) | 0.74 (0.62–0.88) | 0.75 (0.62–0.90) | 0.93 (0.87–1.00) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 c | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.67–0.95) | 0.73 (0.61–0.88) | 0.71 (0.58–0.86) | 0.92 (0.86–0.99) | 0.001 |
| Hyperglycemia | ||||||
| No. of cases/controls | 840/845 | 565/783 | 495/730 | 436/659 | ||
| Crude OR | 1.00 | 0.73 (0.63–0.84) | 0.68 (0.59–0.79) | 0.67 (0.57–0.78) | 0.82 (0.77–0.86) | <0.001 |
| Model 1 a | 1.00 | 0.74 (0.64–0.86) | 0.68 (0.58–0.79) | 0.64 (0.55–0.75) | 0.81 (0.76–0.85) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 b | 1.00 | 0.89 (0.76–1.04) | 0.84 (0.71–0.99) | 0.86 (0.72–1.02) | 0.92 (0.87–0.98) | <0.001 |
| Model 3 c | 1.00 | 0.90 (0.76–1.06) | 0.82 (0.68–0.97) | 0.84 (0.69–1.02) | 0.92 (0.86–0.99) | 0.055 |
a Model 1: adjusted for sex, age (≤40, 40–49, 50–59, ≥60), and body mass index (≤18, 18–23.9, 24–27.9, ≥28). b Model 2: adjusted for model 1 plus smoking (current, former, and never), drinking (current, former, and never), physical activity (yes or no), an education level (none or elementary school, middle school, and high school or college), family history of diabetes (yes or no), and survey center (Ezhou and Shenzhen). c Model 3: adjusted for model 2 plus multiple essential elements (plasma calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, chromium, selenium, and cobalt, all in quartiles).
Adjusted ORs (95% CIs) for plasma molybdenum concentrations associated with MetS in subgroups.
| Subgroup | % | Quartiles of Plasma Molybdenum Concentrations | Per SD of Log-Transformed Molybdenum |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (≤1.05) | Q2 (1.05–1.46) | Q3 (1.46–1.97) | Q4 (≥1.97) | ||||
| Age | 0.18 | ||||||
| ≤50 | 35.3 | 1.00 | 0.93 (0.71–1.22) | 0.66 (0.50–0.88) | 0.44 (0.33–0.60) | 0.69 (0.62–0.77) | |
| >50 | 64.7 | 1.00 | 0.61 (0.49–0.74) | 0.54 (0.44–0.68) | 0.49 (0.38–0.61) | 0.77 (0.71–0.84) | |
| Sex | 0.002 | ||||||
| Men | 55.2 | 1.00 | 0.57 (0.46–0.72) | 0.53 (0.42–0.66) | 0.44 (0.34–0.56) | 0.74 (0.68–0.80) | |
| Women | 44.8 | 1.00 | 0.94 (0.74–1.18) | 0.71 (0.55–0.91) | 0.58 (0.44–0.76) | 0.80 (0.72–0.88) | |
| BMI | <0.001 | ||||||
| ≤24 | 32.7 | 1.00 | 0.39 (0.28–0.55) | 0.19 (0.13–0.26) | 0.12 (0.08–0.18) | 0.43 (0.37–0.50) | |
| >24 | 67.3 | 1.00 | 0.85 (0.71–1.02) | 0.87 (0.71–1.06) | 0.79 (0.64–0.98) | 0.92 (0.85–0.99) | |
| Current Smoking | 0.067 | ||||||
| No | 77.1 | 1.00 | 0.76 (0.63–0.91) | 0.65 (0.54–0.79) | 0.52 (0.42–0.64) | 0.76 (0.71–0.82) | |
| Yes | 22.9 | 1.00 | 0.57 (0.40–0.81) | 0.41 (0.28–0.59) | 0.39 (0.26–0.58) | 0.73 (0.64–0.84) | |
| Current Drinking | 0.017 | ||||||
| No | 73.6 | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.66–0.96) | 0.71 (0.59–0.86) | 0.57 (0.46–0.71) | 0.81 (0.75–0.87) | |
| Yes | 26.4 | 1.00 | 0.56 (0.41–0.78) | 0.37 (0.26–0.51) | 0.32 (0.23–0.46) | 0.65 (0.57–0.74) | |
| Physical activity | 0.603 | ||||||
| No | 43.6 | 1.00 | 0.65 (0.50–0.83) | 0.52 (0.40–0.67) | 0.45 (0.35–0.60) | 0.72 (0.65–0.79) | |
| Yes | 56.4 | 1.00 | 0.80 (0.65–0.98) | 0.67 (0.54–0.84) | 0.51 (0.40–0.66) | 0.79 (0.72–0.86) | |
| Family history of diabetes | 0.427 | ||||||
| No | 88.8 | 1.00 | 0.70 (0.59–0.83) | 0.59 (0.49–0.70) | 0.48 (0.40–0.58) | 0.76 (0.71–0.82) | |
| Yes | 11.2 | 1.00 | 0.86 (0.53–1.40) | 0.68 (0.40–1.14) | 0.47 (0.27–0.82) | 0.74 (0.61–0.89) | |
| Survey center | 0.467 | ||||||
| Ezhou | 53.8 | 1.00 | 0.60 (0.48–0.75) | 0.50 (0.39–0.63) | 0.41 (0.31–0.54) | 0.71 (0.65–0.78) | |
| Shenzhen | 46.2 | 1.00 | 0.85 (0.67–1.07) | 0.67 (0.52–0.85) | 0.54 (0.42–0.71) | 0.81 (0.74–0.88) | |
Results were adjusted for sex, age (≤40, 40–49, 50–59, ≥60), body mass index (≤18, 18–23.9, 24–27.9, ≥28), smoking (current, former, and never), drinking (current, former, and never), physical activity (yes or no), an education level (none or elementary school, middle school, and high school or college), family history of diabetes (yes or no), survey center (Ezhou and Shenzhen), and multiple essential elements (plasma calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, chromium, selenium, and cobalt, all in quartiles).
Figure 1The restricted cubic spline for the associations of log-transformed plasma molybdenum with MetS and its components. (A) MetS; (B) abdominal obesity; (C) hypertriglyceridemia; (D) low HDL-C; (E) hypertension; (F) hyperglycemia. Knots were placed at the 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles of the plasma molybdenum distribution. Results were adjusted for sex, age (≤40, 40–49, 50–59, ≥60), body mass index (≤18, 18–23.9, 24–27.9, ≥28), smoking (current, former, and never), drinking (current, former, and never), physical activity (yes or no), an education level (none or elementary school, middle school, and high school or college), family history of diabetes (yes or no), survey center (Ezhou and Shenzhen), and multiple essential elements (log-transformed plasma calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, chromium, selenium, and cobalt).
Figure 2Joint effect of the essential elements mixture (calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, chromium, selenium, molybdenum, and cobalt) on MetS by using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) model. (A) Overall effect of the essential elements mixture estimates and 95% confidence intervals. (B) Single element association (estimate and 95% confidence intervals); this plot compares ORs of MetS when a single element was at the 75th vs. 25th percentile when all the other elements were fixed at either the 25th (red line), 50th (green line), or 75th percentile (blue line). Results were adjusted for sex, age (≤40, 40–49, 50–59, ≥60), body mass index (≤18, 18–23.9, 24–27.9, ≥28), smoking (current, former, and never), drinking (current, former, and never), physical activity (yes or no), an education level (none or elementary school, middle school, and high school or college), family history of diabetes (yes or no), and survey center (Ezhou and Shenzhen).