Xin Wang1, Bhramar Mukherjee2, Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez1, William H Herman3, Stuart Batterman4, Siobán D Harlow1, Sung Kyun Park5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 5. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: sungkyun@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies on associations between metals and insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction have been cross-sectional and focused on individual metals. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the association of exposure to metal mixtures, based on assessment of 15 urinary metals, with both baseline levels and longitudinal changes in homeostatic model assessments for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and β-cell function (HOMA-β). METHODS: We examined 1262 women, aged 45-56 years at baseline (1999-2000), who were followed through 2015-2016, from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Urinary concentrations of 15 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, cobalt, cesium, copper, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, tin, thallium, and zinc) were determined at baseline. HOMA-IR and HOMA-β were repeatedly measured over 16 years of follow-up. A two-stage modeling was used to account for correlations in dependent and independent variables: In stage-1, linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the participant-specific baseline HOMA levels from random intercepts and participant-specific rates of changes from random slopes. In stage-2, adaptive elastic-net (AENET) models were fit to identify components of metal mixtures associated with participant-specific baseline levels and rates of changes in HOMA-IR and HOMA-β, respectively. An environmental risk score (ERS) was used to integrate metal mixture effects from AENET results. RESULTS: In multivariable adjusted AENET models, urinary zinc was associated with higher HOMA-IR at baseline, whereas molybdenum was associated with lower HOMA-IR at baseline. The estimated changes in baseline HOMA-IR for one standard deviation increase in log-transformed urinary metal concentrations were 5.76% (3.05%, 8.55%) for zinc and -3.25% (-5.45%, -1.00%) for molybdenum, respectively. Urinary zinc was also associated with lower HOMA- β at baseline. Arsenic was associated with a slightly faster rate of decline in HOMA-β in the AENET model evaluating associations between metals and rate of changes. Significant associations of ERS with both HOMA-IR and HOMA-β at baseline were observed. ERS for the rate of changes was not calculated and examined in relation to rates of changes in HOMA-IR and HOMA-β because only a single metal was selected by AENET. CONCLUSION: Exposure to metal mixtures may be exerting effects on insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, which might be mechanisms by which metal exposures lead to elevated diabetes risks.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies on associations between metals and insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction have been cross-sectional and focused on individual metals. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the association of exposure to metal mixtures, based on assessment of 15 urinary metals, with both baseline levels and longitudinal changes in homeostatic model assessments for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and β-cell function (HOMA-β). METHODS: We examined 1262 women, aged 45-56 years at baseline (1999-2000), who were followed through 2015-2016, from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Urinary concentrations of 15 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, cobalt, cesium, copper, mercury, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, tin, thallium, and zinc) were determined at baseline. HOMA-IR and HOMA-β were repeatedly measured over 16 years of follow-up. A two-stage modeling was used to account for correlations in dependent and independent variables: In stage-1, linear mixed effects models were used to estimate the participant-specific baseline HOMA levels from random intercepts and participant-specific rates of changes from random slopes. In stage-2, adaptive elastic-net (AENET) models were fit to identify components of metal mixtures associated with participant-specific baseline levels and rates of changes in HOMA-IR and HOMA-β, respectively. An environmental risk score (ERS) was used to integrate metal mixture effects from AENET results. RESULTS: In multivariable adjusted AENET models, urinary zinc was associated with higher HOMA-IR at baseline, whereas molybdenum was associated with lower HOMA-IR at baseline. The estimated changes in baseline HOMA-IR for one standard deviation increase in log-transformed urinary metal concentrations were 5.76% (3.05%, 8.55%) for zinc and -3.25% (-5.45%, -1.00%) for molybdenum, respectively. Urinary zinc was also associated with lower HOMA- β at baseline. Arsenic was associated with a slightly faster rate of decline in HOMA-β in the AENET model evaluating associations between metals and rate of changes. Significant associations of ERS with both HOMA-IR and HOMA-β at baseline were observed. ERS for the rate of changes was not calculated and examined in relation to rates of changes in HOMA-IR and HOMA-β because only a single metal was selected by AENET. CONCLUSION: Exposure to metal mixtures may be exerting effects on insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction, which might be mechanisms by which metal exposures lead to elevated diabetes risks.
Authors: Deborah A Elder; Patricia M Herbers; Tammy Weis; Debra Standiford; Jessica G Woo; David A D'Alessio Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: S W Tsaih; J Schwartz; M L Lee; C Amarasiriwardena; A Aro; D Sparrow; H Hu Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Ning Ding; Xin Wang; Marc G Weisskopf; David Sparrow; Joel Schwartz; Howard Hu; Sung Kyun Park Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dianna J Magliano; Rakibul M Islam; Elizabeth L M Barr; Edward W Gregg; Meda E Pavkov; Jessica L Harding; Maryam Tabesh; Digsu N Koye; Jonathan E Shaw Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-09-11
Authors: Maria Grau-Perez; Chin-Chi Kuo; Matthew O Gribble; Poojitha Balakrishnan; Miranda Jones Spratlen; Dhananjay Vaidya; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Eliseo Guallar; Ellen K Silbergeld; Jason G Umans; Lyle G Best; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Shelley A Cole; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Margaret C Weiss; Yu-Hsuan Shih; Molly Scannell Bryan; Brian P Jackson; David Aguilar; Craig L Hanis; Maria Argos; Robert M Sargis Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Ning Ding; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Bhramar Mukherjee; Antonia M Calafat; Siobán D Harlow; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Hypertension Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Xin Wang; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Bhramar Mukherjee; William H Herman; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ning Ding; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; William H Herman; Antonia M Calafat; Bhramar Mukherjee; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 7.401
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Michelle M Hood; Ning Ding; Bhramar Mukherjee; Antonia M Calafat; John F Randolph; Ellen B Gold; Sung Kyun Park Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Xin Wang; Ning Ding; Siobán D Harlow; John F Randolph; Bhramar Mukherjee; Ellen B Gold; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 13.352