Literature DB >> 34959587

Antiprotozoal Effect of Snake Venoms and Their Fractions: A Systematic Review.

Zainab U Abdullahi1,2, Salihu S Musa3,4, Daihai He3, Umar M Bello5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protozoal infection is a lingering public health issue of great concern, despite efforts to produce drugs and vaccines against it. Recent breakthrough research has discovered alternative antiprotozoal agents encompassing the use of snake venoms and their components to cure these infections. This study collated the existing literature to examine the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their fractions.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from their inception until 13 October 2021. Articles were screened at the title, abstract and full-text phases. Some additional studies were obtained through the manual search process.
RESULTS: We identified 331 studies via the electronic database and manual searches, of which 55 reporting the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their components were included in the review. Around 38% of studies examined the effect of whole crude venoms, and a similar percentage evaluated the effect of a proportion of enzymatic phospholipase A2 (PLA2). In particular, this review reports around 36 PLA2 activities and 29 snake crude venom activities. We also report the notable phenomenon of synergism with PLA2 isoforms of Bothrops asper. Importantly, limited attention has been given so far to the antiprotozoal efficacies of metalloproteinase, serine protease and three-finger toxins, although these venom components have been identified as significant components of the dominant venom families.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the impact of snake venoms and their fractions on controlling protozoal infections and suggests the need to examine further the effectiveness of other venom components, such as metalloproteinase, serine protease and three-finger toxins. Future research questions in this field must be redirected toward synergism in snake venom components, based on pharmacological usage and in the context of toxicology. Ascertaining the effects of snake venoms and their components on other protozoal species that have not yet been studied is imperative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiprotozoal; snake venoms; systematic review; venom fractions

Year:  2021        PMID: 34959587      PMCID: PMC8707848          DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10121632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathogens        ISSN: 2076-0817


1. Introduction

The evolutionary origin of snake venom has been traced back to the Cenozoic era [1]. Snake venoms have been identified as one of the most well-characterized animal venoms, with complex compositions of toxic, pharmacologically active proteins and peptides [2]. When compared with the venoms of other animals such as scorpions, spiders and cone snails, snake venoms are considered advanced due to their vast array of larger proteins and peptides that possess medicinal and toxicological effects [3]. About 50–100 components in snake venoms are distributed in dominant and secondary families, presenting multiple proteins and peptide isoforms [4]. The dominant families include secreted phospholipases A2 (PLA2s), snake venom metalloproteases (SVMPs), snake venom serine proteases (SVSPs) and three-finger toxins (3FTXs) [4]. The secondary families comprise cysteine-rich secretory proteins, L-amino acid oxidases (LAAOs), Kunitz peptides, C-type lectins, disintegrins and natriuretic peptides [5]. The compositions of snake venom vary interspecifically and intraspecifically [4], with various influencing factors including age, gender, location, diet and season [1]. These factors influence the diversity of toxins and their multifunctionality, and they greatly impact anti-venom production and envenomation treatment [6]. The pharmacological potentials of snake venoms have been grouped into hemotoxic, neurotoxic and cytotoxic effects [7]. The major toxins involved have been identified as PLA2s, SVMPs, SVSPs and 3FTXs, either singly or in combination. They are equally responsible for the pharmacological effects in snakebite victims [8]. Protozoan diseases are also a significant public health issue of great concern worldwide, especially in developing countries, with children being the most vulnerable population [9]. Millions of individuals globally experience one or more parasitic infections annually, and most of the morbidity and mortality due to protozoan infections are attributed to trypanosomatid and other Apicomplexan parasites [10,11]. However, Toxoplasma gondii and Trichomonas vaginalis are medically important intestinal protozoa [12]. Some of these are considered to be neglected tropical diseases, a term used to describe a group of chronic, debilitating and usually stigmatized conditions that mostly affect poor communities in tropical and subtropical regions [13]. The epidemiological control of protozoan diseases is still not satisfactory, due to the difficulties in achieving vector and reservoir control [1,12]. Equally, efforts toward developing vaccines against these persistent diseases are slow and not yet fruitful. Currently, chemotherapy remains the best choice for clinical management and disease control programs in endemic regions [12]. The chemotherapy agents in use are outdated and not fully cost-effective. In recent decades, efforts have been diverted towards developing novel chemotherapy agents to treat infectious diseases, due to increased drug resistance and the recognition of novel and previously unnoticed infectious agents [14]. The use of snake venoms and their components is an interesting and important concept, due to their potential as therapeutic molecules with antimicrobial features that could be used against shielded bacteria, fungi, parasites, protozoa and viruses [1,15]. We present a comprehensive systematic review of the existing literature on the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their components. Notably, the review is intended to highlight the unconfirmed potentials of various snake venoms and their fractions as alternative treatments for protozoal diseases.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy and Study Screening Processes

The methodology and reporting of the systematic review were conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [16]. Pertinent databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched from inception until 13 October 2021, without restricting the year of publication. Studies reporting the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms or their components were searched and included in the review. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for papers published in English, and the search terms across the two databases were “antiprotozoal OR antiprotozoal activity OR antiprotozoal drugs OR antiprotozoal agents” and “agents OR contrast agent” and “snake venom OR snake venoms OR snake venom metalloproteinase OR phospholipase PLA2 OR snake venom phospholipase A2 OR snake venom three-finger toxin OR snake venom serine proteinases”. The detailed search strategy adopted in this study is presented in Supplementary Table S1. Furthermore, the reference lists of the studies included in the review via the electronic database search were manually searched to ensure wider literature coverage. Citations were managed using EndNote version X9.0 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA), and duplicates were removed using the built-in “find duplicates” feature. Two authors (Z.U.A. and S.S.M.) compiled the citations separately and later discussed them with the other authors to ensure an accurate literature report. Subsequently, the two authors independently and sequentially assessed the titles, abstracts and full text of the non-duplicated generated citations against the eligibility criteria of the study. Discrepancies in the outcomes of the screening processes between the two authors were resolved by further discussions and consultations with the other authors.

2.2. Study Selection and Eligibility Criteria

Articles were included in this review if they assessed the antiprotozoal effect of whole snake venoms or their fractions were published with at least an abstract in English. Restrictions were not placed on the study design; hence, studies of various designs (experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, case-control and case series, among others) were included. We excluded published reviews, review protocols, and conference abstracts.

2.3. Data Extraction and Synthesis

To satisfy the set criteria of the review, two authors (Z.U.A. and S.S.M.) independently extracted all the relevant data using a pre-designed Excel sheet. The data extracted included the author details, date of publication, snake species under study, snake venom components or fractions, concentration of snake venom and components used, specificity of venoms and fractions to protozoan species, and snake venom and component-induced activity on protozoa. The extracted data were then compared, and cases of inconsistent outcomes were rectified via further deliberations among the authors. The data analysis followed the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines [17].

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search Findings and Study Characteristics

The first search identified 309 articles through the electronic databases (100 in PubMed, and 209 in Embase). Additionally, 22 articles were added via the manual search of the reference lists of the included citations, totaling 331 papers (see Figure 1 for the outcomes of the search processes). After duplicates were removed, 319 studies remained. We screened the titles and abstracts of the 319 records against the stated eligibility criteria of the study. Finally, 55 studies were included for further synthesis and analysis. Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart of the study search and screening processes, and Table 1 presents the characteristics of the included studies.
Figure 1

PRISMA diagram for the study search and selection processes.

Table 1

Features of the included studies.

StudyDOPSnake Specie(s)Venom/Venom FractionsIC50/ EC50/LD50 DosagesDosage TrialProtozoansActivity of Snake Venom/Snake Venom Fraction on Protozoal Species
Adade et al. [18]July 2010 Crolatus viridis viridis Crude venomTCE: 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0 μg/mLTTC: 0.3 μg/mLTCA: 0.075, 0.037, 0.29, 0.17 μg/mL (LD50) 0.25–500 μg/mL Trypanasoma cruzi Inhibited the cellular viability of T. cruzi epimastigote, trypomastigote, and amastigote. Exerted effect on the ultrastructure and intracellular survival of T. cruzi. About 76–93% reduction in the number of parasites was observed and up to 94–97% per cell after 9 h. However, at concentrations of 8–500 μg/mL, the venom could not promote antitrypanosomal activity.
Adade et al. [19]October 2014 Crolatus viridis viridis CrovirinTCT: 1.10 ± 0.13 μg/mL (LD50)TCA: 1.84 ± 0.53μg/mL (IC50)TBR:BSF; 2.06 ± 0.12 μg/mL (IC50)TBR: PCF: 1.13 ± 0.31 μg/mL(IC50)TBR: BSF & PCF: 0.6–4.8; TCT: 0.45–4.8 μg/mL; TTCA: 0.45–3.6 μg/mL. T. cruzi T. brucie rodhesiense Active against all the human infective trypanosomatids including the intracellular amastigotes.
LAAO: 1.21 ± 0.89 μg/mL; 1.05 μg/mL (IC50)L.AP: 1.2–4.8 μg/mL;LAA:0.6–9.6 μg/mL L.amazonensis
Adade et al. [20]August 2012 C. viridis viridis PLA22.50 ± 1.42 mcg/mL0.77 ± 0.5 mcg/mL (IC50)0.3125–10 mcg/mL L. amazonensis Inhibited the parasites’ growth in vitro.
Alfonso et al. [21]September 2019 Bothrops mattogrossensis BmatTX-IV 62.4 μg/mL L. infantum, BmatTX-IV inhibited the cellular viability of L. infantum promastigotes in vitro and that of T. cruzi epimastigostes and also a cytotoxic effect on murine fibroblasts.
Crude venomL.P:11.9 μg/mL (IC50)TCE:13.8 μg/mL (IC50)72.5 μg/mL T. cruzi
Allane et al. [22]December 2018 Cerastes cerastes Disintegrin_CcDTDR (IC50)1 μg L. infantum Showed antileishmanial activity and severe morphological alterations of the Leishmania promastigotes.
Aranda-Souza et al. [23]December 2018 Bothrops leucurus BLL1.5 ± 0.17 μg/mL and 1.3 ± 0.06 μg/mL (IC50) LAAO: 0.88 ± 0.24 μg/mL and 0.86 ± 0.07 μg/mL0.01–3.3; 0.8 and 1.6 μM L. amazonensis L. braziliensis Inhibited promastigote growth and viability in both species through a mechanism that was dependent on galactose and calcium.Decreased the intracellular parasites.Caused severe changes in amastigotes, without apparent damage to the host cells.Increased the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-ð by infected macrophages in both species but with some variations in relation to IL-1ᵦ and IL-10.
Bandeira et al. [24]December 2017 Crotalus durissus terrificus Ctn, ctn (1–14), ctn (15–34), IL-37Ctn TCE: Ctn(4.47 ± 0.9 μM); ctn (1–14):DTDRIC50; ctn (15–34):DTDRIC50TCE &TCP:0.9–100 μMand TCA: 0.22 or0.44 μM T. cruzi Ctn resulted in the inhibition of all T. cruzi developmental stages, including the amastigote, and showed a high selective index against trypomastigote. Cell death was induced by necrosis and morphological alterations.
TCT:Ctn:0.22 μMctn (1–14):33.1ctn (15–34):9.5 μM
Barbosa et al. [25]January 2021 Bothrops jararacuccu BjussuLAAO-IIDTDR IC501.56–12.5 μg/mL L. amazonensis L. braziliensis Both were severely cytotoxic to the two Leishmania spp., even at lower concentrations. However, at the same concentrations, both showed a different cytotoxic effect.
Bothrops moojeni BmooLAOO-II
Barros et al. [26]December 2015 Crotalus durissus terrificus PLA2LAP:52.07 μg/mL (IC50)Peptide fraction: 16.98 μg/mL (IC50)0.5–2.5 μg/mL L. infantum Both showed in vitro leishmanicidal activity.
Peptide fractionLAAO: DTDR (IC50)Macrophages: PLA2:98 μg/mL; peptide:16.98 μg/mL0.5–2.5 μg/mL
Bastos et al. [27]December 2008 Bothrops neuwiedi NeuwiedaseBI: PI:7.70 μg/mL (IC50); PIR: 3.24 μg/mLAI: 4.84 μg/mL PIR: DTDR (IC50)12 to 0.7 μg/mLT. gondi infected human fibroblastInhibited the rate of infection by 71% and 61% following treatments before and after infection, respectively. The enzyme has the ability to degrade extracellular matrix components, which is necessary to sabotage T. gondii activity on infected cells.
Bhattacharya et al. [28]September 2013 Bungarus caeruleus Crude venomL.P:14.5 μg/mL (IC50) L.A:11.2 μg/mL (IC50)1–50 μg/mL L. donovani Showed antileishmanial activity against L. donovani in vivo and in vitro; the activity was partly mediated by an immunomodulatory activity that involved the macrophages.
Borges et al. [29]September 2016 Bothrops pauloensis DTDR IC50 The toxin showed reasonable cytotoxicity against HeLa cells at a higher concentration; however, the effect was reduced with a reduction in concentration. In addition, the toxin could not elicit effects on the viability of tachyzoites but lessened its adhesion and proliferation when the tachyzoites were treated before infection.
BnSP-7200–1.5 μg/mL Toxoplasma gondii
Borges et al. [30]June 2018Anti-BnSP-7 IgY antibodies100–0.09 μg/mLToxoplasma gondii and L. amazonensisAnti –BnSP-7 IgY antibodies reduced parasite viability and, at a concentration of 12.5 μg/mL, induced proliferation intracellularly.
Bregge-silva et al. [31]December 2012 Lachesis muta (L.A. A.O)2.22 μg/mL (IC50)0.5–32 μg/mL L. brasiliense Inhibited the activity of L. brasiliense promastigotes.
DTDR IC50 T. cruzi T. cruzi showed resistance.
Carone et al. [32]October 2017 Bothrops jararacussu BJussuLAAO-II4.56 μg/mL (IC50)0.5–32 μg/mL L. amazonensis Showed an antileishmanial and trypanocidal effect on promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania and Trypanosome, respectively.
4.85 μg/mL (IC50)0.93–50 μg/mL T. cruzi
Castanheira et al. [33] March 2015 Bothrops pauloensis BpLecDTDR IC500.195–12.5 μg/mL T. gondii Reduced T.gondi parasitic activity after tachyzoite treatment.
Castillo et al. [34]December 2012 Bothrops asper Fraction V (containing catalytically active PLA2s)1.42 ± 0.56 μg/mL (IC50)25–200 μg/mL P. falciparum The whole venom and fractions showed activity against the parasite. Fraction V, however, had the highest toxicity compared to the whole venom and fraction VI.
Fraction VI (containing a catalytically inactive PLA2-like protein)22.89 ± 1.22 μg/mL (IC50)
Crude venom0.13 ± 0.01 μg/mL (IC50)
Chechet et al. [35]December 2018 Bitis arietans Crude venom0.3085 μg/mL (IC50)0.02–5.0 μg/mL T. brucei brucei Showed anti-trypanosomal activity by lysing the parasite across all different concentrations with little or mild lysis of the erythrocytes.
Ciscotto et al. [36]March 2009 Bothrops jararaca LAAO- active fraction &venomDTDR IC500.8 mg/mL L. amazonensis The venom and LAOO-active fraction resulted in parasite viability of 69% and 47%, respectively.
Costa et al. [37]September 2015 Calloselasma rhodostoma CR-LAOOL.C.P:16.66 μg/mL (IC50)L.B.P:24.47 μg/mL (IC50)0.5, 2, 8, 32 μg/mLL. braziliensis, L. chagasiCaused cytotoxic effect on T. cruzi and Leishmania spp. promastigotes; the activity against all the trypanosomatids was significantly inhibited by catalase.
0.5, 2, 8, 32 μg/mL L. infantum
0.5, 2, 8, 32 μg/mL T. cruzi
Costa-Torres et al. [38]April 2010 Bothrops marajoensis PLA2 (BmarPLA2)DTDR IC500.39–6.25 µg/mLL. amazonensis and L. chagasiFor BmarPLA2, the dosage used (100 μg/mL) could not reach IC50; BmarTV and Bmar LAAO inhibited the growth of L. amazonensis and L. chagasi stages.
Crude venom (BmarTV)LAP:86.56 and LCP:79.02 μg/mL (IC50)12.5–200 µg/mL
BmarLAAOLAP:2.55 µg/mL and LCP:2.86 µg/mL (IC50)0.39–6.25 µg/mL
De Barros et al. [39]July 2016 Bothrops jaracussu PLA214.36 μg/mL (IC50)100 μg/mL–6.25 μg/mL L. amazonensis Showed antileishmanial effect, reduced the promastigotes by 78%, and strengthened the macrophages’ viability by 82%. After 48 h, an amastigote reduction of up to 55% was recorded.
de Menezes et al. [40]January 2012 Bothropoides lutzi Crude venom61.2 μg/mL (IC50)6.25–200 μg/mL Leishmania chagasi Caused inhibitory effects on L. amazonensis and L. chagasi promastigotes.Repressed the growth of T. cruzi epimastigotes.
234.6 μg/mL (IC50)6.25–200 μg/mL L. amazonensis
DTDR IC506.25–100 μg/mL T. cruzi
Dematei et al. [41]June 2021 Bothrops atrox BatxC, 4.90 (EC50)0 to 50 μM; BatxC (0.70, 0.47, 0.23 μM); BatxC (C-2.14Phe) des-Phe (1.94, 0.97 and 0.48 μM) BatxC (C-2.15Phe) (0.93, 0.47 and 0.23 μM) L. amazonensis All showed antileishmanial activity on promastigotes and amastigotes and also induced morphological changes.
BatxC (C-2.15Phe)6.74 (EC50),
BatxC (C-2.14Phe)des-Phe18.86 μM (EC50)
Deolindo et al. [42]November 2010 Bothrops jararaca LAAO4.3 μg/mL (LD50)10–60 μg/mL T. cruzi Induced antitrypanosomal activity, resulting in changes similar to those observed in programmed cell death. The activity was, however, reversed not only by the presence but also by the absence of a hydrophobic amino acid that was required for the process.
Deolindo et al. [43]February 2005 Bothrops jararaca Crude venom10 μg/mL (IC50)5, 10, 25, 50 μg/mL T. cruzi Both induced the programmed death of cells in T. cruzi epimastigotes, with the activity of crude venom being due to stress, through a process similar to that of apoptosis in metazoans.
El Chamy Maluf et al. [44]April 2016 Crotalus durissus Crotamine1.87 μM (IC50)1.25–20 μM P. falciparum Inhibited the development of P. falciparum in a dose-dependent pattern.
Fernandez et al. [45]August 1994 Cerastes cerastes Naja haje Vipera lebetina Crude venomDTDR (IC50)1–100 μg/mL T. cruzi, L. donovani infantum The venoms of C. cerastes and N. haje showed a growth inhibition effect on the trypanosomatids.
Gonçalves et al. [46]March 2002 Bothrops jararaca Crude venomDTDR (IC50)K0.5: 0.1–0.3 μg/mL (IC50)50 μg/mL L. major Resulted in ultrastructural alteration and inhibited the growth of L. major epimastigotes and amastigotes.Resulted in the ultrastructural alteration and inhibition in the growth of T. cruzi trypomastigotes.
0.1, 1, 10, 100 μg/mL T. cruzi
Grabner et al. [47]September 2017 Bothrops marajoensis Crude venom: 0.14 ± 0.08μ g/mL (IC50)BmajPLA2-II(b): 6.41 ± 0.64 μg/mL (IC50) Venom: 3–0.093 μg/mL; PLA2: 10–0.3125 μg/mL P. falciparum Showed antiplasmodial activity against the parasites.
DTDR(IC50)125 μg/mL T. cruzi Showed activity against the stages of trypanosome.
BmajPLA2-II(b)Dosage used (100 μg/mL) did not reach IC50100–6.25 μg/mL L. infantum Showed activity against the stages of Leishmania.
Guillaume et al. [48]March 2004 Najamossambica PLA22.3 pM (IC50) P. falciparum All the tested PLA2s inhibited the intraerythrocytic development of P. falciparum. All PLA2s showed toxicity against trophozoite as well as schizont stages.
Notechis scutatus Notexin2.6 nM (IC50)
Agkistrodon halys PLA282.3 pM (IC50)
Vipera ammodytes Ammodytoxin A2.8 nM (IC50)
Hajialiani et al. [49]April 2020 Naja Naja Oxiana Venom fraction0.026 μg/mL (IC50)2.6 μg/mL–0.0000026 μg/mL P. falciparum The active fraction at the particularly stated concentration possessed anti-plasmodial efficacy.
Imam et al. [50] February 2021 Naja nigricolis Crude venom0.411 μg/mL (IC50)1.2, 2.4, 3.6 μg/mL Trichomonas vaginalis Showed trichomonicidal potency.
Bitis arietans 0.805 μg/mL (IC50)
Izidora et al. [51]May/June 2011 Bothrops pijarai BpirLAAO-IBI: 1.83 μg/mL (ID50); 3.14 μg/mLAI: 1.20 μg/mL (ID50)20 to 0.3 μg/mLT. gondii in human foreskin fibroblastsThe enzyme was effective in inhibiting the infection of neighboring cells and, hence, the spread of the parasite, instead of targeting the primary infection and arresting parasite replication.
Kayano et al. [52]November 2015 Bothrops brazili Venom BbMP-1Venom:3.2 μg/mL (IC50)BbMP-1: 0.17 μg/mL (IC50)20–0.001 μg/mLs P. falciparum Showed the biotechnological potential of the metalloproteinase as an antiplasmodial candidate.
Macedo et al. [53]January 2015 Crotalus durissis terrificus Crotamine, Crotamine in solution and in microparticlesDTDR IC50100 to 3.1 μg/mLL. amazonensis in infected macrophagesCaused a decrease in the number of amastigotes. When a comparison was made with its activity on infected macrophages; the biodegradable microparticles containing crotamine were trapped by macrophages, which led to an increase in TNF-α levels of about 196 pg/mL.
Martins et al. [54]July 2019 Bothrops moojeni Crude venom 0.5 ± 0.01 μg/mL (IC50) 20 μL P. falciparum Inhibited the growth of W2 strain P. falciparum in vitro.
BmooMP α-I16.14 ± 2.35 μg/mL (IC50)
Mello et al. [55]May 2017 Bothrops atrox (BatxC)TT: 0.44 μM (IC50)TE: 11.3 μM(IC50)0.44–100 μm T. cruzi Inhibited all the developmental stages of T. cruzi, with a high selective index of 315, and also caused necrosis.
Mendes et al. [56]December 2019 Agkistrodon contortrix p-AclpAcl: L.A.P:50.98, (EC50)L.A.A: 57.23 (EC50)L.I.A: 220.32) μm (EC50)L.A.P. & L.A.A:0–250 μm L.I.A:0–100 μm L. amazonensis Active against L. amazonensis and L. infantum promastigotes and amastigotes, with low cytotoxicity on primary murine macrophages.
p-AclR727.19, 36.83, 70.72 μm (EC50) L. infantum
P-ACLR7: 237.70 μM (CC50)P-Acl-232.88 μM (CC50)0, 2.5, 50, 100, 150 μmL. infected macrophages
Merkel et al. [57]September 2007 Eristocophis macmahoni Spermine 186 ng/mL (IC50)2–10 μg/mL T. brucie Caused autophagy in the parasite.
Moura et al. [58]March 2014 Bothrops mattogrossensis BmatTX-IDTDR IC503.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μg/mL L. amazonensis Inhibited the cellular viability of L. amazonensis promastigotes in vitro.
BmatTX-I II
BmatTX-I I
Crude venom
Nunes et al. [59]February 2013 Bothrops pauloensis BnSP-7LP:58.7 μg/mL (IC50) and LA:28.1 μg/mL (IC50)L.P-25–200 μg/mLL.A-100 μg/mL L. amazonensis This resulted in the inhibition of parasite proliferation of the promastigotes and reduced the cellular viability of the amastigotes. The toxin also resulted in severe morphological changes in the promastigotes.
Paiva et al. [60]May 2011 Bothrops atrox BatroxLAAOLDP: 4.3 μg/mL (EC50) 0.5–32 μM L.donovani Resulted indose-dependent killing of the parasite.
LMP: 4.5 μg/mL 0.5–32 μM L. major Resulted in the dose-dependent killing of Leishmania spp. promastigotes and T. cruzi trypomastigotes.
LBP: 23.34 μg/mL (EC50) 0.5–32 μM L. braziliensis
TCP: 62.8 μg/mL (IC50)0.5–32 μM T. cruzi
Passero et al. [61]July 2007Crotalus speciesCrotalus durissus terrificus (Cdt) venom(4.70 ± 1.72 μg/mL IC50)7.81–500 μg/mL Crotalus durissus terrificus (Cdt) venom resulted in higher antileishmanial activity than Cdca.Crotalus durissus cascavella (Cdca) venom resulted in antileishmanial activity; however, a concentration of 44.30 μg/mL increased parasite numbers by 50%. Equally, the venom showed less antileishmanial activity at higher concentrations (281.00 μg/mL IC50).
Crotalus durissus cascavella (Cdca) venom(9.41 ±1.21 μg/mL IC50)
Crotalus durissus collineatus (Cdcol) venom(281.00 ± 9.50μg/mL IC50) 7.81–500 μg/mL
Cdca crotamine-19.95 ± 4.21 μg/mL (IC50)3.12–100 μg/mL
Cdca crotoxin-99.80 ± 2.21 μg/mL (IC50)
Cdca gyroxin-3.80 ± 0.52 μg/mL (IC50)
Cdca convulvin DTDR IC50
Peichoto et al. [62]July 2011 Philodryas patagoniensis (PPV) Crude venomsDTDR (IC50)50.1–1.695 μg/mL L. major TblV showed significant antileishmanial activity at its highest concentration; however, it resulted in parasite proliferation at intermediate concentrations.PPV was not very active in inhibiting parasite growth and its highest concentration was required to inhibit 51.5% proliferation. PbV, PooV and HttV at their final concentrations did not significantly inhibit L. major growth.PLA2 (trimorphin) of TbLV caused a biphasic effect with potent cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent pattern and resulted in parasite proliferation at its highest concentration.
Philodryas baroni (PbV) DTDR (IC50)438,524,562 μg/mL
P. olfersi olfersi (POOV)
Hypsiglena torquata texana (HttV)
Trimorphodon biscutatus lambda (TlbV) (108.6 μg/mL IC50)11.9–191 μg/mL
(TblV) PLA2(Trimorphin)0.25 μM; 3.6 μg/mL0.01–1 μM
Quintana et al. [63]November 2012 Crotalus durissus cumanensis Crude venom0.17 ± 0.03 μg/mL (IC50)0.05–0.5 μg/mL P. falciparum The venom and the two fractions showed antiplasmodial activity against the mononuclear cells. Although all showed a cytotoxic effect, crotoxin B showed the highest at a concentration higher than the one required to exert an antiplasmodial effect.
Crotoxin B0.6 ± 0.04 μg/mL (IC50)0.1–1.0 μg/mL
Crotoxin B complex0.76 ± 0.17 μg/mL (IC50)0.1–1.0 μg/mL
2.22 μg/mL (IC50)0.5–2.00 μg/mL
DTDR IC50
Sharifi et al. [64]November 2021 Naja Naja oxiana Venom fraction NNOV-FKLTP: 46.59 ± 2.38 μg/mL:(IC50)LTA:0.18 ug/mL ± 0.02 (IC50) and L.IM: 0.51 μg/mL (IC50)6.25–100 μg/mL L. tropica Showed severe leishmanicidal activity against developmental stages in a dimensional pattern. The Th1 indicators significantly improved (TNF-α, interleukins-12 and iNOS gene expression). Conversely, IL-10 (T helper 2 markers) were drastically reduced.
Shinohara et al. [65]December 2005 C. d. terrificus DTDR (IC50)3.125–200 μg/mL Giardia duodenalis Both inhibited the growth of trophozoites, and the inhibition level varied with concentration and incubation times.
B.jararaca 5–320 μg/mL
Simoes-Silva et al. [66]September 2021 Bothrops asper Venom and acidic PLA2s; BasPAC-I, BASPAC-II, BASPAC-III, and BASPAC-IV and the basic PLA2s; BASPB-I, BASPB-II, BASPB-III, BASPB-IV and BASPB-V8.6 μg/mL (IC50):100–6.25 μg/mL L. infantum All the acidic, BASPAC-I, BASPAC-II, BASPAC-III, BASPAC-IV demonstrated action against L. infantum promastigotes and T. cruzi epimastigotes.The basic, BASPB-II, and BASP-IV showed activity against P. falcifarum with activity showing about a 10-fold increase when ASP49-PLA2 and LYS49-PLA2 were associated with each other, thereby proving a synergistic action between the PLA2 isoforms.
34.7 μg/mL (IC50)BASPB-II (100–6.25) T. cruzi
BASPB-II:2.46; 0.98 μM (IC50)BASPB-IV: 0.019; 0.0019 μm (IC50)BASPB-II:40–0.625 μm BASPB-IV (0.2–0.0031 μm) P. falciparum
Soares et al. [67]July 2020 Micrurus lemniscatus ML-LAAO0.14 μg/mL (IC50)5.0 to 0.03 μg/mL L. amazonensis Showed in vitro leishmanicidal action in a dose-dependent pattern, which was significantly reduced by catalase.
0.039 μg/mL (IC50) L. chagasi
Stábeli et al. [68]March/April 2006 Bothrops moojeni MjTX-IIDTDR (IC50)0.1–100 μg/mL L. donovani Inhibited the cellular viability of L. amazonensis, L. braziliensis, L. donovani, and L. major promastigotes in vitro.
L. major
DTDR (IC50) L. braziliensis
L. amazonenis
Tempone et al. [69]January 2001 Bothrops moojeni Crude venom Crude venom: LAP:7.56 ± 0.020 μg/mL (EC50)30–0.15 μg/mL L. amazonensis L. chagasi L. panamensis Caused a killing effect in vitro against Leishmania spp., and activity was attributed to the activity of an enzyme that constitutes 1.5% of the venom, characterized as L-amino acid oxidase.
LAOOLAP: 1.44 ± 0.062 μg/mLLPP: 1.19 ± 0.0083 μg/mL (EC50)LCP: 1.08 ± 0.0024 μg/mL (EC50)300–0.244 μg/mL
Toyama et al. [70]January 2006 Crotalus durissus cascavella LAAO2.39 μg/mL (IC50)4.81–77 μg/mL L. amazonensis Resulted in severe antileishmanial activity on the L. amazonensis promastigote.
Vitorino et al. [71]December 2020 Bothrops diporus Enzymatically active PLA2s and homologs: BdTX-I, 2.44 μg/mL (IC50)10–0.00488 μg/mL P. falciparum All the phospholipases showed antiparasitic activity against the P. falciparum W2 strain.
BdTX-II0.0153 μg/mL,
BdTX-III0.59 μg/mL, respectively (IC50)
Zieler et al. [72]December 2001 Crotalus adamanteus PLA2DTDR IC500.0001–10 μmol L−1P. gallinaceum and P. falciparumBlocked ookinete adhesion and oocyst formation of P. gallinaceum and P. falciparum. Although PLA2 did not present a direct effect on the parasite, pretreatment of the midguts with its catalytically active or inactive form may strongly lessen the association between ookinete and midgut. This indicated that PLA2 functions by associating with the midgut surface and preventing the activity of ookinete in relation to it.

Abbreviations: P-Acl = Agkistrodon contortrix myotoxin; p-AclR7 = Acl homolog; Ctn = cathelicidin; Batxc = Bothrops cathelicidin; BLL = Bothrops leucurus lectin; Bplec = Bothrops pauloensis lectin; BPP = Bradykinin potentiate peptide; BSF = Blood Stream form, PCF = procyclic form; TCP: Tissue culture promastigotes; BatxC = Batroxicidin; MTx = Mojave toxin; MjTx-II = Bothrops moojeni myotoxin-II; BnSP-7 = B. pauleonsis toxin; BdTx = B. diporus toxin; BjTx = B. moojeni toxin; LAAO = L-amino acid oxidase; LIM = Leishmania-infected macrophages; NI = not indicated; BI = before infection; AI = after infection; IR = intracellular replication; PI = parasite invasion; ASA = all species above; LA = Leishmania amastigotes; L.P = Leishmania promastigotes; TT = Trypanosome trypomastigotes; DTDR IC50: dosage tried did not reach IC50; ADSC: at different serial concentrations; LAP: L. amazonensis promastigotes; LLP: Leishmania panamensis promastigotes; LCP: Leishmania chagasi promastigotes; LDP: Leishmania donovani promastigotes; LMP: Leishmania major promastigotes; LBP: Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes; TCT: Trypasoma cruzi trypomastigotes.ss.

3.2. Antiprotozoal Effect of Snake Crude Venoms

We identified 55 studies that met our inclusion criteria, of which 20 were conducted to evaluate the antiprotozoal efficacy of snake crude venoms [18,21,28,34,35,36,38,40,43,45,46,47,49,50,58,61,62,63,65,69]. We identified a previous study that reported the antiprotozoal effect of snake crude venoms, with some hypotheses about the specific snake venom fractions responsible for antiprotozoal activity without proof from laboratory trials [10]. Three reports [35,50,61] hypothesized that several proteins identified from the crude venom of Bitis arietans (B. arietans) could be responsible for its trypanocidal activity. Alape-Giron et al. [73] described snake venoms as a mixture of structured peptides, including enzymes and toxins, that comprise metalloproteases (41–44%), PLA2s (29–45%), serine proteases (4–18%), LAAOs (5–59%), disintegrins (1–2%), C-type lectin-like proteins (0.5%) and cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs; 0.1%). Similarly, Imam et al. [50] reported that the venom of B. arietans is composed of several catalytically active enzymes, including PLA2, LAAOs and CRISPs. Adade et al. [18] also reported that crovirin, a CRISP contained in the snake venom of Crolatus viridis viridis, showed promising activity against T. cruzi. PLA2s have equally been reported to have antitrypanosomal activity [34]. Furthermore, previous studies [28,69] showed the impact of the trypanocidal activity of LAAOs. However, this may exclude the possibility that the other proteins reported by Chechet et al. [35], which corresponded to those reported by Guidlolin et al. [74], were responsible for the antitrypanosomal activity, either singly or synergistically. According to Peichoto et al. [62], the activity of the crude venom on the protozoal species was due to trimorphin. However, several works [18,40,45,46] suggested the need for further research to ascertain which components possess antiprotozoal efficacy, though crucial information has been reported on them, including their molecular weight and thermal stability [45,46]. Similarly, a need was reported to further investigate the fractions of B. jararaca and C.d. terrificus with antigiardial potential, suggesting that more research will provide details on the mechanisms of action [75].

3.3. Antiprotozoal Effect of Snake Venom Components or Fractions

LAAOs are oxidoreductase flavoenzymes that catalyze the stereospecific oxidative deamination of L-amino acids to produce the α-keto acids, NH3 and H2O2 [25]. They form part of several proteins in ophidians, particularly hemorrhagic venoms. LAAOs have been reported to possess the ability to induce apoptosis in several types of cells [25], including vascular endothelial cells, but the mechanism of action remains unclear. The LAAO activity has been proven to be due to H2O2 production, which, in turn, has been linked with the oxidation of several proteins in the plasma membrane [1]. Our systematic review found different documented antiprotozoal activities of LAAOs. Several researchers reported antileishmanial activity in the respective species [31,32,36,67,70]. Other [25,37,38,42,60] showed their influence on growth inhibition, cytotoxic activity, inhibitory effect, programmed cell death and parasite killing on trypanosomatids. Furthermore, the LAAOs of Bothrops pirajai resulted in maximal inhibition of infection with T. gondii [51]. PLA2s are enzymatic proteins with a low molecular weight. They are responsible for promoting hydrolysis of the 3-sn-phosphoglyceride-dependent calcium 2-acyl ester bond, resulting in lysophospholipids and fatty acid products [1]. The PLA2s of snake venoms may appear to be the same but could have different toxicological efficacies in their myotoxicity, neurotoxicity, anticoagulant activity, hemolysis, hyperalgesia, inflammation, edema, cytotoxicity, hypotension, and parasitic activity [10]. The activity of PLA2s on protozoal species varies across species of snakes and the protozoal organisms involved, as described in Table 1. Previous reports [34,47,71] indicated the inhibitory effects of PLA2s of the respective snake venoms on P. falciparum. According to many other studies [21,58,59,68], various PLA2s inhibited the cellular viability of Leishmania species. In addition, Borges et al. [29] and Borges et al. [30] reported that PLA2s of B. pauloensis inhibited parasite adhesion, intracellular proliferation, parasite viability, intracellular proliferation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in T. gondii. Furthermore, the PLA2s of B. pauloensis induced in vitro cell death in L. mexicana [52], and Zieler et al. [72] reported that the PLA2s of C. adamanteus blocked the ookinete adhesion and oocyst formation of both P. gallinaceum and P. falciparum. According to a previous study [63], crotoxin B and its complex from C. durissus cumanensis exerted a cytotoxic effect against the mononuclear cells of P. falciparum, and another [19] reported that the crovirin from C. viridis could inhibit and lyse human-infective trypanosome species, including the intracellular amastigotes. However, despite the successful antiprotozoal activities of PLA2s on protozoal species, Costa-Torres et al. [38] reported that the PLA2s of B. marajoensis did not promote any inhibition of L. amazonensis or L. chagasi growth. Similarly, Grabner et al. [47] reported that the PLA2s of B. marajoensis did not promote the in vitro inhibition of cellular viability in T. cruzi epimastigote, even at 100 μg/mL. Snake venom metalloproteases (SVMPs) are zinc-dependent proteinases of around 20–110 kDa [76]. They are grouped into P-I, P-II and P-III classes according to their structural domains. These toxins are significant in viper venom compositions and have a substantial role in the toxicity of these venoms. The origin of SVMPs is linked to disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) proteins, particularly ADAM28 [77], with the P-III class being the most basal structural variant, comprising metalloproteinase, disintegrin-like, and cysteine-rich domains. Subsequently, P-II SVMPs came from P-IIIs and consisted of a metalloprotease and disintegrin domain, with the latter particularly found in venom as a proteolytically processed product [1]. The final class, PI SVMPs, which have only the metalloproteinase domain, evolved on multiple independent occasions in specific lineages due to the loss of the P-II disintegrin coding domain. SVMPs contribute extensively to the hemorrhagic and coagulopathy venom activities following bites by viperid snakes. Their isoform diversity often presents in their venom, likely facilitating synergistic effects such as a simultaneous action on multiple steps of the blood-clotting cascade [1]. Reports [27,52,54] showed the antiprotozoal activities of a metalloproteinase from the Bothrops species on T. gondii, and P. falciparum, which is one of the most threatening and widespread species.

4. Discussion

A total of 55 articles on the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their components were identified through our systematic search of the existing literature. The majority were on the antiprotozoal efficacy of PLA2s. Over 70% of the snake species reported were vipers, with very few reports on the Colubridae species [78]. A significant proportion (around 20%) constituted species of the Elapidae family. PLA2s form a considerable component in the venoms of vipers and elapids [78], due to their biomedical importance over others [79]. PLA2s have catalytically active and inactive components. Asp49-PLA2s are the catalytically active component, and Lys49-PLA2s are the catalytically inactive component, which can facilitate pharmacological effects regardless of catalytic activity [80,81]. Findings on both the catalytically active and catalytically inactive PLA2s were reported in our study. The mediation of antiprotozoal effects by PLA2s could occur through the interaction of either PLA2 phospholipids or PLA2 proteins. Interestingly, the commonly described receptors in the cell membranes are the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), M-type receptors, and nucleolin [82,83]. Bregge-Silva et al. [31] reported synergism involving the PLA2 isoforms of B. asper, which resulted in around a 10-fold increase in antiplasmodial activity during the association of AS49-PLA2 and LYS49-PLA2. Synergism is an important phenomenon that occurs in snake venoms, leading to evolving strategies to potentiate toxicities. Synergism exists between toxins or toxin complexes in various snake venoms, with PLA2s (toxins or subunits) the primary enablers [84]. Snake venoms can induce considerable toxicity, which may be due to many toxins’ cumulative or synergistic roles. Their compositions function together, directly or indirectly, and result in improved toxicity and pharmacological efficacy. Most synergisms of toxins have been noticed where SVSPs, PLA2s, 3FTxs and SVMPs were co-administered [84]. Synergism involving two PLA2s in B. asper has also been reported [85]. The ASP49-PLA2 and LYS49-PLA2 homologs were reported to have acted synergistically, leading to an increase in Ca2+ ions in the plasma membrane, in turn resulting in the rapid death of myotubes. Another study reported a synergistic phenomenon between the myotoxins of ASP49-PLA2 and LYS49-PLA2, which resulted in irreversible membrane and overall cell damage [86]. Concerning the antiprotozoal activity of whole crude venoms, variations in their activity and composition are not uncommon, leading to their unique potentials in biomedical research [79]. The past literature has noted that variations in snake venoms’ biochemical makeup occur even among closely related species and within species [87,88,89]. For instance, in pit vipers and adders, intra-genus or intra-specific variation in venoms has been documented [87,90]. These diversities are attributed to diet [87,91,92,93] or topography [94,95]. Other attributable factors include repetitions in toxin-encoding genes, production processes [96,97,98,99,100], and functional and structural diversifications [75,88,101,102]. For example, venom from Laticauda semifasciata (a sea snake) does not have a complex composition, and it has just two prominent families of proteins, 3FTxs and PLA2s. However, the venoms of rattlesnakes and mambas can have 50–100 peptides or proteins, representing around 10–20 protein families [84]. Generally, the predominant protein families in snake venoms significantly comprise phylogenetic trends. The venoms of cobras, kraits, mambas and hydrophids in particular have more negligible toxins, such as 3FTxs and PLA2s. In contrast, viperid venoms are made up of more significant fractions with enzymatic activities such as snake venom metalloproteinase and snake venom serine protease [84]. For instance, the venom of C. durissus terrificus is composed of amino acids, small peptides, carbohydrates, lipids, biogenic amines, and enzymes, whereas that of B. jararaca has peptides, serine, and metalloproteases as its constituents [75]. Hence, the activity of venoms varies with the difference in concentrations and compositions. Aside from the role of snake species in the antiprotozoal effect, parasites also present contributing factors. Promastigotes and amastigotes are physiologically different in their sensitivity to drugs, with amastigotes having the greater capability to accumulate drugs [75]. Furthermore, Podešvová et al. [52] reported that variations in the compositions of parasite membranes could also be responsible for the differences in the activities of snake venoms and their fractions. Additionally, mechanisms including post-translational modifications, protein stability, and folding may likely influence toxin activity on parasites [52].

4.1. Strengths

This systematic review was conducted following an extensive literature search of the pertinent PubMed and Embase databases. Relevant citations were extracted using the reference lists of the included studies to ensure robust coverage of the existing literature. The systematic review covered studies on the antiprotozoal effect of crude venoms and their components from clinical studies and scientific reports. No restrictions were placed on the year of publication to ensure the thorough collation of relevant information. Equally, the study inclusion criteria were not restricted to snake species or components, to provide detailed information to the research community on the research question and the gaps in the literature.

4.2. Limitations

Despite the strengths of our systematic review, it has some limitations. First, we restricted inclusion to studies published in English, thereby limiting the ability to incorporate relevant data from studies in languages other than English. Additionally, incorporating a meta-analysis on the antiprotozoal efficacy of venoms and their fractions would have improved the quality of our work, which could be considered in future studies.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review provides a general overview of the antiprotozoal effect of snake venoms and their components. We found varying antiprotozoal activities, presenting outstanding breakthroughs in the quest for alternative therapies for lingering protozoal infections. However, several variations were documented, including the concentrations of the crude venoms and fractions used, IC50 dosages, protozoan species, and antiprotozoal activities. These findings present challenges as to how the reviewed snake venoms and their fractions could serve as alternative antiprotozoal agents for many protozoal species, if not all. An excellent approach to this dilemma could be gearing research efforts toward understanding the relationships between venom components in the context of synergism, rather than toward studies on individual units, mainly because venomous snake species are numerous. Future studies also need to focus on other snake venom components that have received little attention. We recommend that other protozoan species should be subjected to trials with crude snake venoms and their fractions.
  91 in total

Review 1.  Snake venomics. Strategy and applications.

Authors:  Juan J Calvete; Paula Juárez; Libia Sanz
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  Isolation of a new L-amino acid oxidase from Crotalus durissus cascavella venom.

Authors:  Marcos H Toyama; Daniela de O Toyama; Luiz F D Passero; Marcia D Laurenti; Carlos E Corbett; Thaise Y Tomokane; Fabiana V Fonseca; Edson Antunes; Paulo P Joazeiro; Luis O S Beriam; Maria Alice C Martins; Helena S A Monteiro; Marasses C Fonteles
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Evaluation of the antichagasic activity of batroxicidin, a cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide found in Bothrops atrox venom gland.

Authors:  Clarissa Perdigão Mello; Danya Bandeira Lima; Ramon Róseo Paula Pessoa Bezerra de Menezes; Izabel Cristina Justino Bandeira; Louise Donadello Tessarolo; Tiago Lima Sampaio; Claudio Borges Falcão; Gandhi Rádis-Baptista; Alice Maria Costa Martins
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 4.  Neglected tropical diseases: diagnosis, clinical management, treatment and control.

Authors:  Jürg Utzinger; Sören L Becker; Stefanie Knopp; Johannes Blum; Andreas L Neumayr; Jennifer Keiser; Christoph F Hatz
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 5.  Snakebite envenoming.

Authors:  José María Gutiérrez; Juan J Calvete; Abdulrazaq G Habib; Robert A Harrison; David J Williams; David A Warrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  Genetic organization of alpha-bungarotoxins from Bungarus multicinctus (Taiwan banded krait): evidence showing that the production of alpha-bungarotoxin isotoxins is not derived from edited mRNAs.

Authors:  L Chang; S Lin; H Huang; M Hsiao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  In vivo and in vitro antileishmanial activity of Bungarus caeruleus snake venom through alteration of immunomodulatory activity.

Authors:  Shamik Bhattacharya; Prasanta Ghosh; Tripti De; Antony Gomes; Aparna Gomes; Sandhya Rekha Dungdung
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.011

8.  Heterogeneity, geographic distribution, and pathogenicity of serodemes of Leishmania viannia in Colombia.

Authors:  Nancy Gore Saravia; Kristen Weigle; Claudia Navas; Iris Segura; Liliana Valderrama; Anais Zully Valencia; Blanca Escorcia; Diane McMahon-Pratt
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Toxoplasma gondii: effects of neuwiedase, a metalloproteinase from Bothrops neuwiedi snake venom, on the invasion and replication of human fibroblasts in vitro.

Authors:  Luciana Machado Bastos; Robson J Oliveira Júnior; Deise Aparecida Oliveira Silva; José Roberto Mineo; Carlos Ueira Vieira; David Nascimento Silva Teixeira; Maria Inês Homsi-Brandeburgo; Veridiana Melo Rodrigues; Amélia Hamaguchi
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 2.011

10.  Purification and biochemical characterization of three myotoxins from Bothrops mattogrossensis snake venom with toxicity against Leishmania and tumor cells.

Authors:  Andréa A de Moura; Anderson M Kayano; George A Oliveira; Sulamita S Setúbal; João G Ribeiro; Neuza B Barros; Roberto Nicolete; Laura A Moura; Andre L Fuly; Auro Nomizo; Saulo L da Silva; Carla F C Fernandes; Juliana P Zuliani; Rodrigo G Stábeli; Andreimar M Soares; Leonardo A Calderon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.