| Literature DB >> 34959268 |
Chih-Sheng Chiang1,2,3, Bo-Jie Huang4, Jui-Yu Chen4, Wee Wei Chieng4, Seh Hong Lim5, Wei Lee4, Weoi-Cherng Shyu1,3,4,6,7, Long-Bin Jeng2,8.
Abstract
The anticancer properties of fucoidan have been widely studied in cancer research. However, the lack of safety information on the parenteral administration of fucoidan and its rapid clearance from the system have limited its application. Herein, we assessed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of fucoidan and developed fucoidan nanoparticles (FuNPs) to enhance their therapeutic effect in the mouse model of breast cancer. FuNPs were synthesized through the emulsion method, and the stable colloid has an average size of 216.3 nm. FuNPs were efficiently internalized into breast cancer cells in vitro, demonstrating an enhanced antitumor activity in comparison with free form fucoidan. After the treatment of FuNPs, the tumor progression was significantly inhibited in viv. The tumor volume was reduced by 2.49-fold compared with the control group. Moreover, the inhibition of the invasion of tumor cells into the lungs revealed the antimetastatic properties of the FuNPs. FuNPs, as naturally marine polysaccharide-based nanoparticles, have shown their broader therapeutic window and enhanced antimetastatic ability, opening an avenue to the development of the inherently therapeutic nanomedicines.Entities:
Keywords: anti-metastasis; antitumor effect; fucoidan nanoparticle; marine polysaccharide; parenteral administration; safety
Year: 2021 PMID: 34959268 PMCID: PMC8707834 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13121986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1The use of fucoidan at the single dose of 50–275 mg kg−1 via intraperitoneal injection is determined safe in mice. (a) Left panel: there was no significant difference in body weight of the males and females when they were randomly assigned to each group before the injection. Middle panel: The body weight of the mice was not affected 14 days after the exposure to a single dose of Fucoidan. Right panel: Low-, mid- and high-dose Fucoidan did not affect the body weight of the mice at the end point of the toxicity test. (b) Representative microscopic images depict no observable impact of fucoidan to the brain, heart, lung, spleen, and kidney. All data are shown in means ± s.d. Exact p-values are reported in text. Scale bar = 50 μm for cerebrum, cerebellum, heart, lung, and kidney = 100 μm for spleen.
Figure 2Illustration of the size selection strategy and the characterization of FuNPs. (a) Schematic illustration of size selection for FuNP using centrifugation. SEM images of L+S (b), Large (c), and Small (d) FuNPs groups; (e) TEM image of the Small FuNPs group; The size (f) and zeta potential (g) of the different groups were measured using DLS.
Figure 3Internalization of FuNPs with different sizes into cancer cell lines. The percentage of 4T1 (a) and MDA-MB-231 cells (b) internalizing FuNPs from L+S, Large, and Small groups at 24 h and 48 h incubation was evaluated using flow cytometry.
Figure 4Monitoring the stability of FuNPs in PBS by size (a) and zeta potential (b) using DLS from day 0 (as synthesis) to day 7.
Figure 5The cell viability of MDA-MB-231 after treating fucoidan or FuNPs with various concentrations. The experiments were performed with at least 6 biological independent samples. One-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the statistical difference of cell viability between the cells treated with fucoidan and FuNPs at the concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6Therapeutic efficacy of FuNPs in MDA-MB-231-tumor bearing mice. Tumor volume (a) and body weight change (b) of the MDA-MB-231-tumor-bearing mice treated with saline (control) and FuNPs following the treatment course of q3dx6; the section of lung in control and FuNPs-treated groups. (c) H&E stains of the mice’s lungs showed metastatic tumors in the control group, while the invasion was inhibited in the FuNPs-treated group. Scale bar = 50 μm. The experiments were performed with 4 biological independent animals. One-way ANOVA was performed in Figure 6a to evaluate the statistical difference between the tumor volume at day 49.
Figure 7Safety assessments of FuNPs. (a) The organs and tumors weight of the mice treated with saline (control) and FuNPs; (b) H&E stain for the pathological analysis of the mice treated with FuNPs. Scale bar = 50 μm. The experiments were performed with 4 biological independent animals. One-way ANOVA was performed in Figure 7a to evaluate the statistical difference between the tumor weight between control and FuNP-treated mice; ** p < 0.01.