Natalie J McLain1, Moheb S Yani1, Jason J Kutch2. 1. Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 2. Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: kutch@usc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have found evidence of reduced resting-state peak alpha frequency (PAF) in populations with pain. However, the stability of PAF from different analytic pipelines used to study pain has not been determined and underlying neural correlates of PAF have not been validated in humans. NEW METHOD: For the first time we compare analytic pipelines and the relationship of PAF to activity in the whole brain and thalamus, a hypothesized generator of PAF. We collected resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data and subsequently 64 channel resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) from 47 healthy men, controls from an ongoing study of chronic prostatitis (a pain condition affecting men). We identified important variations in EEG processing for PAF from a review of 17 papers investigating the relationship between pain and PAF. We tested three progressively complex pre-processing pipelines and varied four postprocessing variables (epoch length, alpha band, calculation method, and region-of-interest [ROI]) that were inconsistent across the literature. RESULTS: We found a single principal component, well-represented by the average PAF across all electrodes (grand-average PAF), explained > 95% of the variance across participants. We also found the grand-average PAF was highly correlated among the pre-processing pipelines and primarily impacted by calculation method and ROI. Across methods, interindividual differences in PAF were correlated with rs-fMRI-estimated activity in the thalamus, insula, cingulate, and sensory cortices. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest PAF is a relatively stable marker with respect to common pre and post-processing methods used in pain research and reflects interindividual differences in thalamic and salience network function.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have found evidence of reduced resting-state peak alpha frequency (PAF) in populations with pain. However, the stability of PAF from different analytic pipelines used to study pain has not been determined and underlying neural correlates of PAF have not been validated in humans. NEW METHOD: For the first time we compare analytic pipelines and the relationship of PAF to activity in the whole brain and thalamus, a hypothesized generator of PAF. We collected resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data and subsequently 64 channel resting-state electroencephalographic (EEG) from 47 healthy men, controls from an ongoing study of chronic prostatitis (a pain condition affecting men). We identified important variations in EEG processing for PAF from a review of 17 papers investigating the relationship between pain and PAF. We tested three progressively complex pre-processing pipelines and varied four postprocessing variables (epoch length, alpha band, calculation method, and region-of-interest [ROI]) that were inconsistent across the literature. RESULTS: We found a single principal component, well-represented by the average PAF across all electrodes (grand-average PAF), explained > 95% of the variance across participants. We also found the grand-average PAF was highly correlated among the pre-processing pipelines and primarily impacted by calculation method and ROI. Across methods, interindividual differences in PAF were correlated with rs-fMRI-estimated activity in the thalamus, insula, cingulate, and sensory cortices. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest PAF is a relatively stable marker with respect to common pre and post-processing methods used in pain research and reflects interindividual differences in thalamic and salience network function.
Authors: Marco Aiello; Elena Salvatore; Arnaud Cachia; Sabina Pappatà; Carlo Cavaliere; Anna Prinster; Emanuele Nicolai; Marco Salvatore; Jean-Claude Baron; Mario Quarantelli Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 6.556