Nathan T James1, Joseph H Breeyear2, Richard Caprioli2, Todd Edwards2, Brian Hachey2, Prince J Kannankeril3,4, Jacob M Keaton2,5, Matthew D Marshall6, Sara L Van Driest2,3,4, Leena Choi1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 4. Center for Pediatric Precision Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 6. Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Our objectives were to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis of dexmedetomidine in children using remnant specimens and electronic health records (EHRs) and explore the impact of patient's characteristics and pharmacogenetics on dexmedetomidine clearance. METHODS: Dexmedetomidine dosing and patient data were gathered from EHRs and combined with opportunistically sampled remnant specimens. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. Stage 1 developed a model without genotype variables; Stage 2 added pharmacogenetic effects. RESULTS: Our final study population included 354 post-cardiac surgery patients aged 0-22 years (median 16 mo). The data were best described with a 2-compartment model with allometric scaling for weight and Hill maturation function for age. Population parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals were 27.3 L/h (24.0-31.1 L/h) for total clearance, 161 L (139-187 L) for central compartment volume of distribution, 26.0 L/h (22.5-30.0 L/h) for intercompartmental clearance and 7903 L (5617-11 119 L) for peripheral compartment volume of distribution. The estimate for postmenstrual age when 50% of adult clearance is achieved was 42.0 weeks (41.5-42.5 weeks) and the Hill coefficient estimate was 7.04 (6.99-7.08). Genotype was not statistically or clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the use of real-world EHR data and remnant specimens to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis and investigate covariate effects in a large paediatric population. Weight and age were important predictors of clearance. We did not find evidence for pharmacogenetic effects of UGT1A4 or UGT2B10 genotype or CYP2A6 risk score.
AIMS: Our objectives were to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis of dexmedetomidine in children using remnant specimens and electronic health records (EHRs) and explore the impact of patient's characteristics and pharmacogenetics on dexmedetomidine clearance. METHODS: Dexmedetomidine dosing and patient data were gathered from EHRs and combined with opportunistically sampled remnant specimens. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. Stage 1 developed a model without genotype variables; Stage 2 added pharmacogenetic effects. RESULTS: Our final study population included 354 post-cardiac surgery patients aged 0-22 years (median 16 mo). The data were best described with a 2-compartment model with allometric scaling for weight and Hill maturation function for age. Population parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals were 27.3 L/h (24.0-31.1 L/h) for total clearance, 161 L (139-187 L) for central compartment volume of distribution, 26.0 L/h (22.5-30.0 L/h) for intercompartmental clearance and 7903 L (5617-11 119 L) for peripheral compartment volume of distribution. The estimate for postmenstrual age when 50% of adult clearance is achieved was 42.0 weeks (41.5-42.5 weeks) and the Hill coefficient estimate was 7.04 (6.99-7.08). Genotype was not statistically or clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the use of real-world EHR data and remnant specimens to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis and investigate covariate effects in a large paediatric population. Weight and age were important predictors of clearance. We did not find evidence for pharmacogenetic effects of UGT1A4 or UGT2B10 genotype or CYP2A6 risk score.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Alexander A Vinks; Nieko C Punt; Frank Menke; Eric Kirkendall; Dawn Butler; Thomas J Duggan; DonnaMaria E Cortezzo; Sam Kiger; Tom Dietrich; Paul Spencer; Rob Keefer; Kenneth D R Setchell; Junfang Zhao; Joshua C Euteneuer; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Kevin R Dufendach Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Amanda L Potts; Brian J Anderson; Guy R Warman; Jerrold Lerman; Susan M Diaz; Sanna Vilo Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: Marshall L Jacobs; Sean M O'Brien; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Constantine Mavroudis; Francois Lacour-Gayet; Sara K Pasquali; Karl Welke; Christian Pizarro; Felix Tsai; David R Clarke Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Leena Choi; Cole Beck; Elizabeth McNeer; Hannah L Weeks; Michael L Williams; Nathan T James; Xinnan Niu; Bassel W Abou-Khalil; Kelly A Birdwell; Dan M Roden; C Michael Stein; Cosmin A Bejan; Joshua C Denny; Sara L Van Driest Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Tomoyuki Mizuno; Min Dong; Zachary L Taylor; Laura B Ramsey; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Athena F Zuppa; Susan C Nicolson; Nicole S Wilder; Juan C Ibla; Erin A Gottlieb; Kristin M Burns; Mario Stylianou; Felicia Trachtenberg; Hua Ni; Tera H Skeen; Dean B Andropoulos Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 11.719