Literature DB >> 34957528

Staging 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in 963 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: incidence and characterization of skeletal involvement.

Mikhail Kesler1, Kosta Kerzhner1, Ido Druckmann2, Jonathan Kuten1, Charles Levine1, David Sarid3, Daniel Keizman3, Ofer Yossepowitch4,5, Einat Even-Sapir6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to elaborate the incidence and type of skeletal involvement in a large cohort of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) referred for Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT staging in a single center.
METHODS: Study cohort included 963 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PCa referred for Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET/CT study for staging. The incidence of bone involvement, type of bone metastases, and extent of disease were determined and correlated with the ISUP Grade Group (GG) criteria and PSA levels.
RESULTS: Bone metastases were found in 188 (19.5%) of 963 patients. Bone metastases were found in 10.7% of patients with PSA < 10 ng/dL and in 27.4% of patients with PSA > 10 ng/dL and in 6.1% of patients with GG ≤ 2/3 and in 8.9% of patients with GG 4/5. In 7.6% of the patients, skeletal involvement was extensive, while 11.9% of patients had oligometastatic disease. Osteoblastic type metastases were the most common type of bone metastases presented in 133 of the patients with malignant bone involvement (70.7%). More than half of them had only osteoblastic lesions (72 patients (38.3%)), while the other (61 patients (32.5%)) had also intramedullary and/or osteolytic type lesions. Intramedullary metastases were found in 97 patients (51.6%), while 41 (21.8%) of them were only intramedullary lesions. Osteolytic metastases were detected in 36 patients (19.2%), of which 8 were only osteolytic lesions.
CONCLUSION: Although traditionally bone metastases of PCa are considered osteoblastic, osteolytic and intramedullary metastases are common, as identified on PET with labeled PSMA. Skeletal spread may be present also in patients with GG ≤ 2/3 and PSA < 10 ng/dL.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ga-68 PSMA; Intramedullary; Osteoblastic; Osteolytic; PET/CT; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34957528     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05655-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   10.057


  32 in total

1.  Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients.

Authors:  L Bubendorf; A Schöpfer; U Wagner; G Sauter; H Moch; N Willi; T C Gasser; M J Mihatsch
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 2.  Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using 11C-Choline PET/Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Paolo Castellucci; Francesco Ceci; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2017-01-09

3.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Bone Scintigraphy in Prostate and Breast Cancer: Summary and Excerpts.

Authors:  Kevin J Donohoe; Erica J Cohen; Francesco Giammarile; Erin Grady; Bennett S Greenspan; Robert E Henkin; John Millstine; Gary T Smith; Sandy Srinivas; Julie Kauffman; Sukhjeet Ahuja
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection.

Authors:  Peter H Carroll; James L Mohler
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark (1999 to 2007).

Authors:  Mette Nørgaard; Annette Østergaard Jensen; Jacob Bonde Jacobsen; Kara Cetin; Jon P Fryzek; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; P Bäumer; K Kopka; B A Hadaschik; M Hohenfellner; A Kopp-Schneider; U Haberkorn; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Prostate Cancer-Pretreatment Detection, Surveillance, and Staging.

Authors:  Fergus V Coakley; Aytekin Oto; Lauren F Alexander; Brian C Allen; Brian J Davis; Adam T Froemming; Pat F Fulgham; Keyanoosh Hosseinzadeh; Christopher Porter; V Anik Sahni; David M Schuster; Timothy N Showalter; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Sadhna Verma; Carolyn L Wang; Erick M Remer; Steven C Eberhardt
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Friedrich Fitz; Michael Nader; Wolfgang Loidl; Gabriele Broinger; Franz Stoiber; Ignac Foglman; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options.

Authors:  Martin G Sanda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Erin Kirkby; Ronald C Chen; Tony Crispino; Joann Fontanarosa; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Greene; Laurence H Klotz; Danil V Makarov; Joel B Nelson; George Rodrigues; Howard M Sandler; Mary Ellen Taplin; Jonathan R Treadwell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.

Authors:  Maarten L Donswijk; Pim J van Leeuwen; Erik Vegt; Zing Cheung; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Henk G van der Poel; Marcel P M Stokkel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gallium-68-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET in gastrointestinal cancer: insights into diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Chunxia Qin; Yangmeihui Song; Yongkang Gai; Weiwei Ruan; Qingyao Liu; Fang Liu; Danzha Zheng; Peng Zhang; Hongli Liu; Tao Zhang; Kaixiong Tao; Xiaoli Lan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  18F- or 177Lu-labeled bivalent ligand of fibroblast activation protein with high tumor uptake and retention.

Authors:  Hongsheng Li; Shimin Ye; Jiawei Zhong; Qingsong Yan; Yuhua Zhong; Pengju Feng; Kongzhen Hu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  [18F]FAPI-42 PET imaging in cancer patients: optimal acquisition time, biodistribution, and comparison with [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04.

Authors:  Kongzhen Hu; Lijuan Wang; Hubing Wu; Shun Huang; Ying Tian; Qiaoyu Wang; Caixia Xiao; Yanjiang Han; Ganghua Tang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Rong Lin; Zefang Lin; Zhenying Chen; Shan Zheng; Jiaying Zhang; Jie Zang; Weibing Miao
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT Modalities in Gastrointestinal System Malignancies with Peritoneal Involvement.

Authors:  Umut Elboga; Ertan Sahin; Tulay Kus; Yusuf Burak Cayirli; Gokmen Aktas; Merve Okuyan; Havva Yesil Cinkir; Fatih Teker; Ozlem Nuray Sever; Alper Aytekin; Latif Yılmaz; Aydın Aytekin; Ufuk Cimen; Vuslat Mumcu; Benan Kilbas; Kurtulus Eryilmaz; Davut Cakici; Yusuf Zeki Celen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.484

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.