PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the utilization of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in comparison to 18FDG PET/CT to evaluate the peritoneal involvement of the gastrointestinal malignancies alongside primary lesions and other metastatic foci. PROCEDURES: A total of 37 patients with various gastrointestinal malignancies with accompanying peritoneal involvement who underwent 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT imaging between September 2020 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective study. SUVmax values of 68Ga-FAPI and 18FDG were compared according to lesion locations. Also, the lesion localization ability of both imaging was compared in patient basis. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients with peritoneal involvement (23 males and 14 females; median age, 62.8 ± 12.7 years), 35.1% (n = 13) had colorectal cancer, 37.8% (n = 14) gastric cancer, and 27.0% (n = 10) pancreaticobiliary cancer. While 45.9% of them were operated, the remaining did not have surgery. The mean time interval between two studies was 3.2 days (range: 2-6 days). The mean SUVmax value of peritoneal metastases (p < 0.001) was significantly higher with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT compared to that with 18FDG PET/CT, as in primary lesions (p < 0.001), lymph node metastases (p = 0.006), liver metastases (p = 0.002), and bone metastases (p = 0.018). A total of 185 lesions was detected in the initial assessment with 18FDG PET/CT. Of the total lesions detected with 18FDG PET/CT, 5 of them were evaluated as benign lesions with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT also in accordance with the reference standard. In addition to 180 lesions detected with 18FDG PET/CT, a total of 37 additional malignant lesions, 12 of which were peritoneal metastases, were detected with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. CONCLUSION: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was determined to be superior to 18FDG PET/CT in terms of detection of peritoneal involvement with high image quality as well as primary tumor and other metastatic foci. Consequently, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT can be used as a complementary imaging modality especially for inconclusive 18FDG findings due to the lack of accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT in some of the metastatic regions, especially in the liver.
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the utilization of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in comparison to 18FDG PET/CT to evaluate the peritoneal involvement of the gastrointestinal malignancies alongside primary lesions and other metastatic foci. PROCEDURES: A total of 37 patients with various gastrointestinal malignancies with accompanying peritoneal involvement who underwent 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18FDG PET/CT imaging between September 2020 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective study. SUVmax values of 68Ga-FAPI and 18FDG were compared according to lesion locations. Also, the lesion localization ability of both imaging was compared in patient basis. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients with peritoneal involvement (23 males and 14 females; median age, 62.8 ± 12.7 years), 35.1% (n = 13) had colorectal cancer, 37.8% (n = 14) gastric cancer, and 27.0% (n = 10) pancreaticobiliary cancer. While 45.9% of them were operated, the remaining did not have surgery. The mean time interval between two studies was 3.2 days (range: 2-6 days). The mean SUVmax value of peritoneal metastases (p < 0.001) was significantly higher with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT compared to that with 18FDG PET/CT, as in primary lesions (p < 0.001), lymph node metastases (p = 0.006), liver metastases (p = 0.002), and bone metastases (p = 0.018). A total of 185 lesions was detected in the initial assessment with 18FDG PET/CT. Of the total lesions detected with 18FDG PET/CT, 5 of them were evaluated as benign lesions with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT also in accordance with the reference standard. In addition to 180 lesions detected with 18FDG PET/CT, a total of 37 additional malignant lesions, 12 of which were peritoneal metastases, were detected with 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT. CONCLUSION: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was determined to be superior to 18FDG PET/CT in terms of detection of peritoneal involvement with high image quality as well as primary tumor and other metastatic foci. Consequently, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT can be used as a complementary imaging modality especially for inconclusive 18FDG findings due to the lack of accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT in some of the metastatic regions, especially in the liver.
Authors: Jan D Soyka; Klaus Strobel; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Niklaus G Schaefer; Daniel T Schmid; Alois Tschopp; Thomas F Hany Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: V Lopez-Lopez; P A Cascales-Campos; J Gil; L Frutos; R J Andrade; M Fuster-Quiñonero; E Feliciangeli; E Gil; P Parrilla Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: M J Scanlan; B K Raj; B Calvo; P Garin-Chesa; M P Sanz-Moncasi; J H Healey; L J Old; W J Rettig Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-06-07 Impact factor: 11.205