| Literature DB >> 34957249 |
Chunping Liu1,2, Nathan Bayado3, Dongyue He1, Jie Li1, Huiqi Chen1, Longmei Li1, Jinhua Li1, Xinyao Long1, Tingting Du1, Jing Tang1, Yue Dang1, Zhijin Fan4, Lei Wang1, Phillip C Yang3.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of human death worldwide. Drug thrombolysis, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and other methods are used to restore blood perfusion for coronary artery stenosis and blockage. The treatments listed prolong lifespan, however, rate of mortality ultimately remains the same. This is due to the irreversible damage sustained by myocardium, in which millions of heart cells are lost during myocardial infarction. The lack of pragmatic methods of myocardial restoration remains the greatest challenge for effective treatment. Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles (EVs) actively secreted by all cell types that act as effective transmitters of biological signals which contribute to both reparative and pathological processes within the heart. Exosomes have become the focus of many researchers as a novel drug delivery system due to the advantages of low toxicity, little immunogenicity and good permeability. In this review, we discuss the progress and challenges of EVs in myocardial repair, and review the recent development of extracellular vesicle-loading systems based on their unique nanostructures and physiological functions, as well as the application of engineering modifications in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial repair.Entities:
Keywords: diagnosis and treatment; drug delivery system; engineering strategy; extracellular vesicles; myocardial repair
Year: 2021 PMID: 34957249 PMCID: PMC8695616 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.758050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Mechanisms of EVs-mediated local and distal communications of the heart.
Summary of application of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as carriers in myocardial repair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesenchymal stem cell | Centrifugation Total Exosome Isolation reagent (Invitrogen) | Exosomes 135 nm | Lamp2b+IMTP transfection | AMI | IMTP-exosomes exert enhanced therapeutic effects | ( |
| Induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes (iCMs) | Differential ultracentrifugation method | EVs 98–677 nm | Mitochondrion iCMs self-contain | Myocardial infarction | M-EVs improve mitochondrial function and prevent post-MI LV remodeling | ( |
| Mesenchymal stem cell | Ultracentrifugation | EVs | Chronic myocardial ischemia | Mesenchymal cell–derived EVs induct capillary and arteriolar growth resulting in increased cardiac output and stroke volume | ( | |
| Genetically modified MSCs overexpressing CD47 | Ultracentrifugation | EVs 90–350 nm | miR-21 Electroporation | I/R injury | miR21-loaded CD47-Evs exert anti-apoptosis effects, alleviate cardiac inflammation, improve cardiac morphology and the functional recovery of the I/R myocardium | ( |
| Mesenchymal stem cell Raw 264.7 | Exosome isolation kit (Beyotime, China) LiposoFast extruder apparatus (Avestin, Canada) | Hybrid EVs 109.76 nm | RAW 264.7 membrane fusion-extrusion | I/R injury | Mon-Exos were shown to promote endothelial maturation during angiogenesis and modulate macrophage subpopulations after MI/RI offering additional techniques to help clinicians better manage regenerative therapeutics for ischemic heart diseases | ( |
| Ultrafiltration by centrifugation (UFC) | Chimeric EVs 30–150 nm | DPS/ischemic homing peptide/incubation | I/R injury | IschCDC-EVs greatly enhances localization to injured myocardium as a potential targeting carrier of CVD | ( | |
| HEK293 cells expressing CTP-tagged FLAG-LAMP2b | Sartorius 10-kDa (5 L) poly- ether sulfone membranes | Chimeric EVs <150 nm | siRAGE-loaded C-sEVs | Myocarditis | C-sEVs may be a useful drug delivery vehicle for the treatment of heart disease | ( |
Figure 2Loading and transshipment of EVs.
Strategies for cargo loading into EVs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cargo loading into donor cells | Co-incubation | Simple and feasible; No damage to membrane integrity | Poor specificity; Low loading efficiency | Delivery of DHA and S1P | ( |
| Transfection | Simple and feasible; No damage to membrane integrity | Induce donor cell apoptosis; Impair biological responses; Inefficient packaging | Delivery of miRNA-181a, Lamp2b, IMTP and MiR21 | ( | |
| Direct loading into EVs | Electroporation | Simple and quick; Higher loading efficiency than transfection | EVs aggregation; siRNA precipitation; Not suitable for some RNAs with special structures | Delivery of MiR21 | ( |
| Extrusion | Efficient packaging | Cause potential damages to biofunctional contents | Targeted delivery of MSC-exosomes | ( | |
| Freeze and thaw cycles | Higher loading efficiency | EVs aggregation; Lower drug loading capacity than extrusion | Delivery of curcumin and miR-144-3p | ( | |
| General modification of EVs membrane | Chimeric EVs | Cell membrane targeting ability | Cost of presenting chimeric peptides | Targeted delivery of MSCs and CDC-XOs | ( |
| New engineered EVs-based platforms | Hybrid EVs | Easy preparation and scalability; Adjustable physical parameters | May lose biological functions of integral EVs; Low homogeneity | Delivery of HELIOS | ( |
| New engineered EVs-based platforms EVs membrane camouflaged NVs | Maintain complex EVs membrane structure; Specific targeting ability; High therapy efficacy | Low scalability; Increase the difficulty of fabrication; Time-consuming | Delivery of MiR-21 mimics | ( |
CDC-XOs, cardiosphere-derived cell exosomes; CREKA, cysteine-arginine-glutamic acid-lysine-alanine; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; HELIOS, highly efficient life-support intracellular opto-driven system; IMTP, ischemic myocardium-targeting peptide CSTSMLKAC; LFA1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen1 or αLβ2 integrin; Mac1, macrophage receptor 1 or integrin αMβ2; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; NVs, nanovesicles; S1P, sphingosine-1 phosphate.