Literature DB >> 34956703

Anonymous Audience Response Technology in Image-Based Quiz (IBQ) Neuropathology Lecture for Undergraduate Pre-clinical Medical Students: a Comparison with Traditional Lectures.

Siaw Cheok Liew1, Venkatesh Naik2, Darlina Hani Fadil Azim3.   

Abstract

Pathology teaching, an intensively image loaded discipline, poses a significant challenge in its delivery. A lot of effort has been placed into sourcing teaching methods that could effectively enhance students' understanding and knowledge retention in this discipline. We describe for the first time in the literature the use of an image-based quiz (IBQ) to deliver a neuropathology lecture. The participating medical students were randomised into either the study group (IBQ) or the control group (traditional lecture, TL). The students were asked to complete the pre- and post-multiple choice question (MCQ) test before and after attending either of the allocated interventions. In the IBQ group, the students were presented with image-based quizzes, and answers to the quizzes were projected in real-time on screen. The students in the TL group were given the usual, traditional lecture. A total of 75 third-year medical students participated in this study. The participants were recruited from third-year medical students representing two different academic years. There was no significant difference in the pre- and post-MCQ scores between the IBQ and TL groups. However, a significant improvement in the mean scores for the pre- and post-MCQ results in both the study (p = 0.001; 95% CI 0.572-1.954) and control (p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.561-1.763) groups was observed. We found that the IBQ was a simple, personalised, and cost-effective digitalised tool which our study suggests it to be as effective as the traditional lecture in the delivery of pathology knowledge in undergraduate medical students. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image-based quiz; Medical education; Medical students; Pathology teaching; Quiz

Year:  2021        PMID: 34956703      PMCID: PMC8651868          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01433-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  17 in total

1.  The standard medical microscopic anatomy course: histology circa 1998.

Authors:  J A Hightower; F R Boockfor; C A Blake; C F Millette
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1999-06-15

2.  The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds.

Authors:  Hardy Ernst; Kay Colthorpe
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Don't dump the didactic lecture; fix it.

Authors:  Daniel Richardson
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Esther P Black; Jürgen Rohr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students.

Authors:  Michèle Doucet; André Vrins; Denis Harvey
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  A brief history of pathology: Preface to a forthcoming series that highlights milestones in the evolution of pathology as a discipline.

Authors:  Jan G van den Tweel; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Audience response technology: engaging and empowering non-medical prescribing students in pharmacology learning.

Authors:  Joanne S Lymn; Alison Mostyn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices.

Authors:  Kristina Lisk; Anne M R Agur; Nicole N Woods
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-06

Review 9.  Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jemma Looyestyn; Jocelyn Kernot; Kobie Boshoff; Jillian Ryan; Sarah Edney; Carol Maher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates.

Authors:  Lasitha Samarakoon; Tharanga Fernando; Chaturaka Rodrigo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.