| Literature DB >> 34956336 |
Yoshiaki Maru1, Yoshitaka Hippo1.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common malignancy of the female reproductive tract worldwide. Although comprehensive genomic analyses of EC have already uncovered many recurrent genetic alterations and deregulated signaling pathways, its disease model has been limited in quantity and quality. Here, we review the current status of genetic models for EC in mice, which have been developed in two distinct ways at the level of organisms and cells. Accordingly, we first describe the in vivo model using genetic engineering. This approach has been applied to only a subset of genes, with a primary focus on Pten inactivation, given that PTEN is the most frequently altered gene in human EC. In these models, the tissue specificity in genetic engineering determined by the Cre transgenic line has been insufficient. Consequently, the molecular mechanisms underlying EC development remain poorly understood, and preclinical models are still limited in number. Recently, refined Cre transgenic mice have been created to address this issue. With highly specific gene recombination in the endometrial cell lineage, acceptable in vivo modeling of EC development is warranted using these Cre lines. Second, we illustrate an emerging cell-based model. This hybrid approach comprises ex vivo genetic engineering of organoids and in vivo tumor development in immunocompromised mice. Although only a few successful cases have been reported as proof of concept, this approach allows quick and comprehensive analysis, ensuring a high potential for reconstituting carcinogenesis. Hence, ex vivo/in vivo hybrid modeling of EC development and its comparison with corresponding in vivo models may dramatically accelerate EC research. Finally, we provide perspectives on future directions of EC modeling.Entities:
Keywords: carcinogenesis; endometrial cancer; genetically engineered mouse; immunodeficient mice; mouse model; organoid
Year: 2021 PMID: 34956336 PMCID: PMC8696168 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.798628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Transgenic Cre mice used in generating genetically engineered mice for endometrial cancer models.
| Cell-specificity in uterus | Other FRT | Main non-FRT | Reference | |||
| Epithelium | Mesenchyme | Ovary | FT | |||
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | pituitary gland, mammary gland |
|
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | kidney, cerebellum |
| |
| BAC | ✓ |
| ||||
|
| ✓ | ✓ | mammary gland, neutrophil |
| ||
|
| ✓ | ✓ | kidney |
| ||
|
| ✓ | ✓ | kidney, hepatocyte |
| ||
| CAG | ✓ | N.E. | N.E. | lung, colon, kidney, thyroid, liver |
| |
|
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| ||
| Adenovirus | ✓ | ✓ |
| |||
FRT, female reproductive tract; N.E., not examined.
Drinking water containing doxycyclin.
Intraperitoneal injection of tamoxifen.
Low penetration.
Past literature on genetically engineered mice for endometrial cancer models.
| Cre line | Targeted gene | Penetrance | Latency | EC type | Major histological type | Reference |
| Systemic |
| 100% | 18–39w | - | CAH |
|
|
| 21% | 30–66w | I | AC (poorly diff.) |
| |
|
| 40% | 14–18w | I | AC (well diff.) |
| |
|
| 25% | 32w | I | AC |
| |
|
|
| 89% | 12w | I | AC |
|
|
| 100% | 4w | I | AC (EMC) |
| |
|
| 100% | 16w | I | AC |
| |
|
| N.A. | N.A. | I | AC |
| |
|
| 100% | 34w | I | AC (EMC) |
| |
|
| 47% | 48w | II | AC |
| |
|
| 100% | 12w | II | AC (poorly diff.) |
| |
|
|
| 100% | 30w | I | AC |
|
|
| 100% | 43–58w | I | AC |
| |
|
| 100% | 60w | II | AC |
| |
| BAC |
| 100% | 40–67w | II | CS |
|
|
| 100% | 45w | I | AC (EMC) |
| |
|
|
| 100% | 12w | - | CAH |
|
|
| 100% | 20w | I | AC (moderately to poorly diff.) |
| |
|
|
| 84% | 65–79w | II | AC (SC, CCC), CS, Undiff. Ca |
|
|
|
| 100% | 6–12w | I | AC (EMC) |
|
|
| 81% | 57w | II | AC (SC) |
| |
| CAG |
| 100% | 6–8w | - | AC |
|
|
|
| 90% | 22–56w | - | Stromal tumor |
|
| Adenovirus |
| 41% | 16–32w | I | AC |
|
|
| 88% | 2w | I | CAH, AC (EMC) |
| |
|
| 100% | 8–28w | I | AC (EMC) |
| |
|
| 50% | 14w | I | AC (EMC) |
|
AC, adenocarcinoma; CAH, complex atypical hyperplasia; CCC, clear cell carcinoma; CS, carcinosarcoma; EMC, endometrioid carcinoma; SC, serous carcinoma; diff., differentiated; Undiff. Ca, undifferentiated carcinoma; N.A., not available.
FIGURE 1Organoid-based ex vivo/in vivo hybrid carcinogenesis model. Primary cells were isolated and subjected to the Matrigel bilayer organoid culture method. Cancer-specific recurrent genetic alterations are reconstituted in murine organoids by lentiviral infection. These transduced organoids were inoculated into the subcutis of nude mice to monitor tumor development for 8–10 weeks. The effects of particular genetic alterations on tumorigenic potential were evaluated in terms of the incidence, size, and histology of the tumors. Induced subcutaneous tumors and mouse-derived tumor organoids can be analyzed using many downstream assays.