| Literature DB >> 34956135 |
Selvasankar Murugesan1, Mohammed Elanbari2, Dhinoth Kumar Bangarusamy1, Annalisa Terranegra1, Souhaila Al Khodor1.
Abstract
Background: Many studies have linked dysbiosis of the gut microbiome to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, studies assessing the association between the salivary microbiome and CVD risk on a large cohort remain sparse. This study aims to identify whether a predictive salivary microbiome signature is associated with a high risk of developing CVD in the Qatari population.Entities:
Keywords: CVD; QGP; machine learning; precision medicine; salivary microbiome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34956135 PMCID: PMC8703018 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.772736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Clinical parameters of the study cohort.
| LR ( | MR ( | HR ( | ||
| Male ( | 1184 | 161 | 87 | <0.001 |
| Female ( | 1307 | 159 | 76 | <0.001 |
| CVD score | 2.78 ± 2.48 | 13.89 ± 2.75 | 31.76 ± 11.87 | <0.001 |
| BMI | 28.37 ± 5.86 | 30.51 ± 4.76 | 31.18 ± 5.80 | <0.001 |
| Age | 35.11 ± 10.22 | 50.89 ± 7.15 | 55.87 ± 8.14 | <0.001 |
| APT | 33.82 ± 2.97 | 33.82 ± 2.97 | 33.13 ± 3.05 | 0.011 |
| Albumin (gm/L) | 44.30 ± 3.31 | 44.16 ± 3.16 | 43.14 ± 3.59 | 0.001 |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 70.02 ± 20.66 | 75.71 ± 21.32 | 76.39 ± 21.70 | <0.001 |
| ALT (GPT) (U/L) | 22.02 ± 16.54 | 28.67 ± 16.15 | 27.72 ± 15.11 | <0.001 |
| AST (GOT) (U/L) | 19.89 ± 16.80 | 21.08 ± 7.83 | 20.39 ± 7.41 | <0.001 |
| Calcium (mmol/L) | 2.29 ± 0.08 | 2.30 ± 0.095 | 2.32 ± 0.10 | <0.001 |
| Cholesterol total (mmol/L) | 4.92 ± 0.93 | 5.37 ± 1.11 | 5.44 ± 1.28 | <0.001 |
| C-Peptide (ng/mL) | 2.14 ± 1.30 | 2.88 ± 2.22 | 2.83 ± 1.38 | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 65.24 ± 13.90 | 74.04 ± 13.91 | 77.71 ± 19.86 | <0.001 |
| Dihydroxy VitD Total (ng/mL) | 17.65 ± 11.46 | 19.57 ± 11.35 | 19.13 ± 9.43 | <0.001 |
| Ferritin (mcg/L) | 65.02 ± 105.93 | 109.76 ± 96.33 | 124.33 ± 101.1 | <0.001 |
| Fibrinogen (gm/L) | 3.29 ± 0.68 | 3.40 ± 0.65 | 3.48 ± 0.67 | 0.001 |
| Folate (nmol/L) | 20.64 ± 7.51 | 22.42 ± 7.25 | 22.82 ± 7.44 | <0.001 |
| Free thyroxine (pmol/L) | 12.96 ± 1.89 | 12.73 ± 1.85 | 12.82 ± 1.46 | 0.006 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.18 ± 1.50 | 6.71 ± 2.91 | 7.92 ± 3.79 | <0.001 |
| HbA1C | 5.40 ± 0.83 | 6.28 ± 1.56 | 7.14 ± 1.95 | <0.001 |
| HDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.43 ± 0.38 | 1.19 ± 0.30 | 1.12 ± 0.29 | <0.001 |
| Hemoglobin (gm/dL) | 13.44 ± 1.79 | 14.59 ± 1.44 | 14.45 ± 1.56 | <0.001 |
| Insulin (mcunit/mL) | 12.31 ± 14.90 | 19.03 ± 27.04 | 16.25 ± 12.89 | <0.001 |
| INR | 1.05 ± 0.09 | 1.01 ± 0.09 | 1.00 ± 0.10 | <0.001 |
| Iron (μmol/L) | 14.92 ± 6.71 | 16.59 ± 5.75 | 16.18 ± 5.74 | <0.001 |
| LDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.96 ± 0.87 | 3.29 ± 1.20 | 3.37 ± 1.18 | <0.001 |
| Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.36 ± 0.37 | 4.44 ± 0.38 | 4.51 ± 0.42 | <0.001 |
| Total protein (gm/L) | 73.67 ± 3.90 | 73.26 ± 3.82 | 73.15 ± 3.81 | 0.083 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.16 ± 0.69 | 1.81 ± 1.18 | 1.94 ± 1.15 | <0.00 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 4.21 ± 1.25 | 4.75 ± 1.21 | 5.07 ± 1.84 | <0.001 |
APT, activated partial thromboplastin time; BMI, body mass index; INR, International Normalization Ration, PT, prothrombin time; TSH, thyroid stimulating Hormone; TIBC, total iron binding capacity.
*P-value < 0.05, **P-value < 0.01, ***P-value < 0.001.
FIGURE 1Overall study design from participant recruitment to SM-based CVD marker selection. (A) The study workflow. (B) Strategies applied in Supervised machine learning (ML) to select pertinents.
FIGURE 2The salivary microbiome composition of CVD risk groups. Y-axis shows % of relative abundance of the microbiome; X-axis indicates the microbial abundance in LR, MR, and HR groups; (A) phylum level; (B) genus level.
FIGURE 3Graphs of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores for differentially enriched bacterial genera among the groups. (A) LR (green) vs. HR (red) groups; (B) LR (green) vs. MR (Yellow) groups; (C) HR (red) vs MR (Yellow) groups.
FIGURE 4Machine learning models. Barplots representing the selection percentages of the microbes selected at least 80% of the time by the four methods over the 50 random splits of the data. (A) Binary transformation. (B) Arcsin transformation. (C) Venn Diagram showing the number of microbes. (D) Heatmap [presence (green)/absence (red)] of selected microbes using Binary and Arcsin transformations. (E) Balloon plot representing sign counts of the regression coefficients: Binary transformation (F) Arcsin transformation. The size of circles represents the number of splits. The color represents the number of counts. (G) Box plots of the MSE for the four-methods and the two transformations applied to the microbiome abundance data. Each point of the boxplot represents the MSE on the test-set.