| Literature DB >> 34955645 |
Gezahegn Faye1, Tadesse Birhanu2, Tolosa Belete3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergency of multidrug resistance due to the global burden of infectious diseases and drug misuse leads to an urgent identification of new medicines from medicinal plants. The study was designed to perform the documentation of ethno-medicinal plants usage, extraction, phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activities of the herbal extracts.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; North Shewa zone; antimicrobial activity; maceration method; medicinal plants; phytochemical screening
Year: 2021 PMID: 34955645 PMCID: PMC8694572 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S333772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Family, Scientific and Local Names of Ethno-Medicinal Plants Used for Treatment of Infectious Diseases in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia
| S.N | Specimen Voucher No | Family | Scientific Name | Local Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | SlU Ethno Med/01/2018 | |||
| 2. | SlU Ethno Med/02/2018 | |||
| 3. | SlU Ethno Med/03/2018 | |||
| 4. | SlU Ethno Med/04/2018 | |||
| 5. | SlU Ethno Med/05/2018 | |||
| 6. | SlU Ethno Med/06/2018 | |||
| 7. | SlU Ethno Med/07/2018 | |||
| 8. | SlU Ethno Med/08/2018 | |||
| 9. | SlU Ethno Med/09/2018 | |||
| 10. | SlU Ethno Med/10/2018 | |||
| 11. | SlU Ethno Med/11/2018 | |||
| 12. | SlU Ethno Med/12/2018 | |||
| 13. | SlU Ethno Med/13/2018 | |||
| 14. | SlU Ethno Med/14/2018 |
Summary of Plant Families, Habits, Parts, Administration Routes and Diseases Treated Using Medicinal Plants in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia
| S.N | Description of Items | Frequency | Percent (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Plant family | 2 | 14.3 | |
| 2 | 14.3 | |||
| 2 | 14.3 | |||
| 2 | 14.3 | |||
| 1 | 7.14 | |||
| 1 | 7.12 | |||
| 1 | 7.12 | |||
| 1 | 7.14 | |||
| 1 | 7.14 | |||
| 1 | 7.14 | |||
| 2. | Plant habits | Shrub | 9 | 64.3 |
| Tree | 3 | 21.4 | ||
| Herb | 2 | 14.3 | ||
| 3. | Plant parts | Leaf | 10 | 71.4 |
| Root | 2 | 14.3 | ||
| Bark | 1 | 7.14 | ||
| Shoot bud | 1 | 7.14 | ||
| 4. | Administration routes | Topical | 6 | 42.9 |
| Inhalation | 4 | 28.6 | ||
| Oral | 4 | 28.5 | ||
| 5. | Diseases treated | Wound | 5 | 35.7 |
| Abdominal pain | 3 | 21.4 | ||
| Headache | 2 | 14.3 | ||
| Ring worm | 2 | 14.3 | ||
| Pneumonia | 2 | 14.3 | ||
Note: Each percentage was calculated from the total 14 documented family plants.
Phytochemical Screening Test Results Selected Ethno-Medicinal Plants
| S.N | Scientific Name | Phytochemicals | Tests | Hexane extract | Chloroform extract | Methanol extract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alkaloid | Wagner’s test | _ | _ | _ | |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski’s test | + | _ | _ | ||
| Phenolic | Ferric chloride | _ | _ | + | ||
| Flavonoid | NaOH test | _ | + | _ | ||
| Saponin | Foam test | _ | + | + | ||
| 2 | Alkaloid | Wagner’s test | _ | _ | _ | |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski’s test | ++ | _ | _ | ||
| Phenolic | Ferric chloride | _ | _ | ++ | ||
| Flavonoid | NaOH test | + | + | _ | ||
| Saponin | Foam test | _ | _ | + | ||
| 3 | Alkaloid | Wagner’s test | _ | _ | _ | |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski’s test | + | + | _ | ||
| Phenolic | Ferric chloride | _ | _ | + | ||
| Flavonoid | NaOH test | _ | _ | + | ||
| Saponin | Foam test | _ | + | _ | ||
| 4 | Alkaloid | Wagner’s test | _ | _ | _ | |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski’s test | + | _ | _ | ||
| Phenolic | Ferric chloride | _ | _ | + | ||
| Flavonoid | NaOH test | + | _ | _ | ||
| Saponin | Foam test | + | + | _ | ||
| 5 | Alkaloid | Wagner’s test | _ | _ | _ | |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski’s test | + | _ | _ | ||
| Phenolic | Ferric chloride | _ | ++ | + | ||
| Flavonoid | NaOH test | _ | _ | + | ||
| Saponin | Foam test | _ | _ | _ |
Notes: − = Not present; + = Present; ++ = highly present.
Antibacterial Activity Results of Plant Extracts Against Bacterial Species (200 mg mL−1)
| Bacterial Species | Diameter of Inhibition Zone (mm) (Mean ± S.D) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hexane | Chloroform | Methanol | G | DMSO | Hexane | Chloroform | Methanol | G | DMSO | |
| 10.3± 0.29 | 13.1 ± 0.29 | 9.83±0.29 | 13.2 ± 0.29 | NI | 11.7±0.58 | 13.2±0.29 | 12.7±0.58 | 15.3±0.58 | NI | |
| 8.83 ±0.29 | 21.7±0.58 | 17.7±0.58 | 21.7±0.58 | NI | 9.0±0.0 | 21.7±0.58 | 15.8±0.29 | 22.5±0.50 | NI | |
| 11.7 ± 058 | 12.3±0.58 | 10.8±0.29 | 12.3±0.58 | NI | 14.0±0.0 | 12.3±0.58 | 11.5±0.50 | 20.3±0.58 | NI | |
| 11.7 ± 0.58 | 11 ± 0.0 | 12.7± 0.58 | 11.0±0.0 | NI | 10.7±0.58 | 11.0±0.0 | 12.7±0.58 | 12.7±0.58 | NI | |
| 11.7±0.58 | 15.3±0.58 | 10.8±0.29 | 15.3±0.58 | NI | 12.7±0.58 | 11.7±0.58 | 12.0±0.0 | 11.7±0.58 | NI | |
| 16.7.±0.58 | 22.5±0.50 | 20.0±0.0 | 22.5±0.50 | NI | 12.7±0.58 | 22.3±0.58 | 11.7±0.58 | 22.3±0.58 | NI | |
| 13.9±0.06 | 20.3±0.58 | 12.7±0.58 | 20.3±0.58 | NI | 12.3±0.58 | 11.7±0.58 | 10.8±0.29 | 11.7±0.58 | NI | |
| 14.0±0.0 | 12.7±0.58 | 14.7±0.58 | 12.7±0.58 | NI | 11.0±0.0 | 11.7±0.58 | 15.7±0.58 | 11.7±0.58 | NI | |
| 9.83±0.29 | 11.7±0.58 | 13.7±0.58 | 24.1±1.00 | NI | ||||||
| 9.83±0.29 | 22.3±0.58 | 14.0±0.0 | 25.7±0.58 | NI | ||||||
| 13.7±0.58 | 11.7±0.58 | 14.3±0.58 | 26.3±0.58 | NI | ||||||
| 12.0±0.0 | 14.3±0.29 | 12.8±0.0 | 21.7±0.58 | NI | ||||||
: NI, No Inhibition; G, Gentamycin; DMSO, Dimethylsulfoxide.
Antifungal Activity Results of Plant Extracts Against Fungal Species (200 mg mL−1)
| Fungal | Diameter of Inhibition Zone (mm) (Mean ± S.D) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7 ± 0.58 | 13.7 ± 0.58 | 11.7 ±1.15 | 13.7±0.58 | NI | 13.0±0.58 | 13.7±0.58 | 13.0±1.00 | 15.0±0.0 | NI | |
| 12.0±1.00 | 28±0.29 | 21.0±1.00 | 28.3±3.10 | NI | 12.3±0.58 | 23.3± 1.15 | 14.3±1.15 | 23.3± 1.15 | NI | |
| 18.0±0.0 | 23.3±0.29 | 13.7±0.58 | 20.7±0.58 | NI | ||||||
Abbreviation: C, Contamazole.