| Literature DB >> 34951133 |
Jong Hwan Jeong1, Hyeongbin Park1, Chang-Min Choi1, Ju Hyun Oh1, Geun Dong Lee2, Dong Kwan Kim2, Hee Sang Hwang3, Se Jin Jang3, Sang Young Oh4, Mi Young Kim4, Wonjun Ji1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB)-guided transbronchial dye marking and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is an emerging technique that enables successful resection of multiple small subsolid pulmonary nodules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety of preoperative ENB-guided transbronchial multiple dye localization for VATS resection of subsolid pulmonary nodules.Entities:
Keywords: dye localization; electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy; multiple subsolid pulmonary nodules
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34951133 PMCID: PMC8807268 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
FIGURE 1ENB‐guided one‐stage multiple dye localization case. (a) A ground‐glass opacity (GGO) nodule in the anterior segment of the LUL. (b) A GGO nodule in the lingular division of the LUL. (c) A GGO nodule of LLL superior segment; (a, b, c‐1) chest CT image; (a, b, c‐2) the navigation screen during the transbronchial approaches; (a, b, c‐3) the lung surface in intraoperative fields after transbronchial dye injection using indigo carmine; (a, b, c‐4) the resected specimen stained by indigo carmine; (a, b, c‐5) the photomicrographs of the resected tissue (X400)
Baseline characteristics of patients with multiple small, subsolid pulmonary nodules
| Cases | Age/sex | Comorbidities | Pulmonary function FVC/FEV1/ratio, %) | DLCO (%) | Number of lung nodules | Size of lung nodules (mm) | Location of lung nodules (segment) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 51/F | Hypothyroidism | 86/87/83 | 82 | 3 | 14 | LLL posterior |
| 7 | LUL anterior | ||||||
| 6 | LLL superior | ||||||
| Case 2 | 53/F | Papillary thyroid cancer, myoma | 92/96/83 | 86 | 3 | 14 | Lingular superior |
| 9 | LLL superior | ||||||
| 6 | LUL anterior | ||||||
| Case 3 | 41/M | Ameloblastoma | 83/81/77 | 84 | 3 | 10 | RLL laterobasal |
| 7 | RLL anterobasal | ||||||
| 4 | RLL mediobasal | ||||||
| Case 4 | 66/F | DM, HTN, endometrial cancer | 103/106/77 | 102 | 2 | 13 | Lingular superior. |
| 8 | LLL anterobasal | ||||||
| Case 5 | 44/F | ‐ | 90/98/93 | 85 | 3 | 12 | LLL laterobasal |
| 9 | LLL superior | ||||||
| 7 | LLL posterobasal | ||||||
| Case 6 | 59/M | Papillary thyroid cancer | 73/77/82 | 100 | 2 | 18 | RUL anterior |
| 6 | RLL superior | ||||||
| Case 7 | 60/M | ‐ | 101/90/68 | ‐ | 2 | 14 | LUL apical |
| 4 | LUL anterior |
Abbreviations: DLCO, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; F, female; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; M, male; LLL, left lower lobe; LUL, left upper lobe; RLL, right lower lobe; RUL, right upper lobe.
Results of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy guided one‐stage multiple dye localization
| Cases | Location of lung nodules | Nodule characteristics | Type of dye used | Localization results | Extent of resection | Pathological finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | LLL posterior | GGO | indigo carmine | Success | Segmentectomy | Invasive ADC |
| LUL anterior | GGO | Success | Wedge resection | AIS | ||
| LLL superior | GGO | Inaccessible | Wedge resection | AIS | ||
| Case 2 | Lingular superior | GGO | indigo carmine | Success | Segmentectomy | Invasive ADC |
| LLL superior | GGO | Success | Wedge resection | AIS | ||
| LUL anterior | GGO | Success | Wedge resection | AIS | ||
| Case 3 | RLL laterobasal | Solid | indigo carmine | Success | Wedge resection | Ameloblastoma |
| RLL anterobasal | Solid | invisible | Wedge resection | Ameloblastoma | ||
| RLL mediobasal | Solid | Success | Wedge resection | Ameloblastoma | ||
| Case 4 | Lingular superior | GGO | indigo carmine | Success | Wedge resection | Focal interstitital fibrosis |
| LLL anterobasal | GGO | Success | Wedge resection | Focal interstitital fibrosis | ||
| Case 5 | LLL laterobasal | GGO | indigo carmine | Success | Lobectomy | Minimally invasive ADC |
| LLL superior | GGO | Success | Lobectomy | Invasive ADC | ||
| LLL posterobasal | GGO | invisible | Lobectomy | Minimally invasive ADC | ||
| Case 6 | RUL anterior | Part solid | indigo carmine | Success | Lobectomy | Invasive ADC |
| RLL superior | GGO | Success | Wedge resection | Minimally invasive ADC | ||
| Case 7 | LUL apical | GGO | indigo carmine + ICG | Success | Wedge resection | AAH |
| LUL anterior | Part solid | Success | Segmentectomy | Invasive ADC |
Abbreviations: AAH, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia; ADC, adenocarcinoma; AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ; GGO, ground‐glass opacity; ICG, indocyanine green; LLL, left lower lobe; LUL, left upper lobe; RLL, right lower lobe; RUL, right upper lobe.
Pre‐ and postoperative pulmonary function
| Baseline value (% of predicted value) | Postoperative value (% of predicted value) | Change of FEV1, L (% of change) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | FVC, L | FEV1, L | FEV1/FVC | FVC, L | FEV1, L | FEV1/FVC | |
| Case 1 | 2.82 (86) | 2.35 (87) | 83 | 2.61 (80) | 2.02 (75) | 77 | −0.33 (−14.0) |
| Case 2 | 3.34 (92) | 2.79 (96) | 83 | 3.16 (89) | 2.35 (83) | 74 | −0.44 (−15.8) |
| Case 3 | 4.75 (83) | 3.67 (81) | 77 | 4.61 (81) | 3.55 (80) | 77 | −0.12 (−3.3) |
| Case 4 | 3.20 (103) | 2.47 (106) | 77 | 3.13 (102) | 2.43 (105) | 78 | −0.04 (−1.6) |
| Case 5 | 2.99 (90) | 2.78 (98) | 93 | 2.35 (71) | 2.09 (74) | 89 | −0.69 (−24.8) |
| Case 6 | 3.12 (73) | 2.55 (77) | 82 | 2.83 (67) | 2.48 (77) | 88 | −0.07 (−2.7) |
| Case 7 | 4.60 (101) | 3.12 (90) | 68 | 4.49 (98) | 2.70 (78) | 60 | −0.42 (−13.5) |
Abbreviations: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; L, liter.