Xiang Li1, Richard C Davis2, Yuemei Xu2,3, Zehan Wang4, Nao Souma5, Gina Sotolongo2, Jonathan Bell2, Matthew Ellis5,6, David Howell2, Xiling Shen4, Kyle J Lafata1,7,8, Laura Barisoni2,5. 1. Duke University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 2. Duke University, Department of Pathology, Division of AI and Computational Pathology, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 3. Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Department of Pathology, Nanjing, China. 4. Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 5. Duke University, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 6. Duke University, Department of Surgery, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 7. Duke University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 8. Duke University, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Recent advances in computational image analysis offer the opportunity to develop automatic quantification of histologic parameters as aid tools for practicing pathologists. We aim to develop deep learning (DL) models to quantify nonsclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli on frozen sections from donor kidney biopsies. Approach: A total of 258 whole slide images (WSI) from cadaveric donor kidney biopsies performed at our institution ( n = 123 ) and at external institutions ( n = 135 ) were used in this study. WSIs from our institution were divided at the patient level into training and validation datasets (ratio: 0.8:0.2), and external WSIs were used as an independent testing dataset. Nonsclerotic ( n = 22767 ) and sclerotic ( n = 1366 ) glomeruli were manually annotated by study pathologists on all WSIs. A nine-layer convolutional neural network based on the common U-Net architecture was developed and tested for the segmentation of nonsclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli. DL-derived, manual segmentation, and reported glomerular count (standard of care) were compared. Results: The average Dice similarity coefficient testing was 0.90 and 0.83. And the F 1 , recall, and precision scores were 0.93, 0.96, and 0.90, and 0.87, 0.93, and 0.81, for nonsclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli, respectively. DL-derived and manual segmentation-derived glomerular counts were comparable, but statistically different from reported glomerular count. Conclusions: DL segmentation is a feasible and robust approach for automatic quantification of glomeruli. We represent the first step toward new protocols for the evaluation of donor kidney biopsies.
Purpose: Recent advances in computational image analysis offer the opportunity to develop automatic quantification of histologic parameters as aid tools for practicing pathologists. We aim to develop deep learning (DL) models to quantify nonsclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli on frozen sections from donor kidney biopsies. Approach: A total of 258 whole slide images (WSI) from cadaveric donor kidney biopsies performed at our institution ( n = 123 ) and at external institutions ( n = 135 ) were used in this study. WSIs from our institution were divided at the patient level into training and validation datasets (ratio: 0.8:0.2), and external WSIs were used as an independent testing dataset. Nonsclerotic ( n = 22767 ) and sclerotic ( n = 1366 ) glomeruli were manually annotated by study pathologists on all WSIs. A nine-layer convolutional neural network based on the common U-Net architecture was developed and tested for the segmentation of nonsclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli. DL-derived, manual segmentation, and reported glomerular count (standard of care) were compared. Results: The average Dice similarity coefficient testing was 0.90 and 0.83. And the F 1 , recall, and precision scores were 0.93, 0.96, and 0.90, and 0.87, 0.93, and 0.81, for nonsclerotic and sclerotic glomeruli, respectively. DL-derived and manual segmentation-derived glomerular counts were comparable, but statistically different from reported glomerular count. Conclusions: DL segmentation is a feasible and robust approach for automatic quantification of glomeruli. We represent the first step toward new protocols for the evaluation of donor kidney biopsies.
Authors: R B Munivenkatappa; E J Schweitzer; J C Papadimitriou; C B Drachenberg; K A Thom; E N Perencevich; A Haririan; F Rasetto; M Cooper; L Campos; R N Barth; S T Bartlett; B Philosophe Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: David Tellez; Geert Litjens; Péter Bándi; Wouter Bulten; John-Melle Bokhorst; Francesco Ciompi; Jeroen van der Laak Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Meyke Hermsen; Thomas de Bel; Marjolijn den Boer; Eric J Steenbergen; Jesper Kers; Sandrine Florquin; Joris J T H Roelofs; Mark D Stegall; Mariam P Alexander; Byron H Smith; Bart Smeets; Luuk B Hilbrands; Jeroen A W M van der Laak Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John D Bukowy; Alex Dayton; Dustin Cloutier; Anna D Manis; Alexander Staruschenko; Julian H Lombard; Leah C Solberg Woods; Daniel A Beard; Allen W Cowley Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Dustin Carpenter; S Ali Husain; Corey Brennan; Ibrahim Batal; Isaac E Hall; Dominick Santoriello; Raphael Rosen; R John Crew; Eric Campenot; Geoffrey K Dube; Jai Radhakrishnan; M Barry Stokes; P Rodrigo Sandoval; Vivette D'Agati; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner; Glen Markowitz; Sumit Mohan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nassim Bouteldja; Barbara M Klinkhammer; Roman D Bülow; Patrick Droste; Simon W Otten; Saskia Freifrau von Stillfried; Julia Moellmann; Susan M Sheehan; Ron Korstanje; Sylvia Menzel; Peter Bankhead; Matthias Mietsch; Charis Drummer; Michael Lehrke; Rafael Kramann; Jürgen Floege; Peter Boor; Dorit Merhof Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Maximilian Dahmen; Felix Becker; Hermann Pavenstädt; Barbara Suwelack; Katharina Schütte-Nütgen; Stefan Reuter Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 4.379