Literature DB >> 33471115

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Quantify Glomerulosclerosis in Kidney Biopsy Specimens.

Jon N Marsh1,2, Ta-Chiang Liu1, Parker C Wilson1, S Joshua Swamidass1,2, Joseph P Gaut1,3.   

Abstract

Importance: A chronic shortage of donor kidneys is compounded by a high discard rate, and this rate is directly associated with biopsy specimen evaluation, which shows poor reproducibility among pathologists. A deep learning algorithm for measuring percent global glomerulosclerosis (an important predictor of outcome) on images of kidney biopsy specimens could enable pathologists to more reproducibly and accurately quantify percent global glomerulosclerosis, potentially saving organs that would have been discarded. Objective: To compare the performances of pathologists with a deep learning model on quantification of percent global glomerulosclerosis in whole-slide images of donor kidney biopsy specimens, and to determine the potential benefit of a deep learning model on organ discard rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study used whole-slide images acquired from 98 hematoxylin-eosin-stained frozen and 51 permanent donor biopsy specimen sections retrieved from 83 kidneys. Serial annotation by 3 board-certified pathologists served as ground truth for model training and for evaluation. Images of kidney biopsy specimens were obtained from the Washington University database (retrieved between June 2015 and June 2017). Cases were selected randomly from a database of more than 1000 cases to include biopsy specimens representing an equitable distribution within 0% to 5%, 6% to 10%, 11% to 15%, 16% to 20%, and more than 20% global glomerulosclerosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Correlation coefficient (r) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) with respect to annotations were computed for cross-validated model predictions and on-call pathologists' estimates of percent global glomerulosclerosis when using individual and pooled slide results. Data were analyzed from March 2018 to August 2020.
Results: The cross-validated model results of section images retrieved from 83 donor kidneys showed higher correlation with annotations (r = 0.916; 95% CI, 0.886-0.939) than on-call pathologists (r = 0.884; 95% CI, 0.825-0.923) that was enhanced when pooling glomeruli counts from multiple levels (r = 0.933; 95% CI, 0.898-0.956). Model prediction error for single levels (RMSE, 5.631; 95% CI, 4.735-6.517) was 14% lower than on-call pathologists (RMSE, 6.523; 95% CI, 5.191-7.783), improving to 22% with multiple levels (RMSE, 5.094; 95% CI, 3.972-6.301). The model decreased the likelihood of unnecessary organ discard by 37% compared with pathologists. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this prognostic study suggest that this deep learning model provided a scalable and robust method to quantify percent global glomerulosclerosis in whole-slide images of donor kidneys. The model performance improved by analyzing multiple levels of a section, surpassing the capacity of pathologists in the time-sensitive setting of examining donor biopsy specimens. The results indicate the potential of a deep learning model to prevent erroneous donor organ discard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33471115      PMCID: PMC7818108          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  33 in total

Review 1.  Role of donor kidney biopsies in renal transplantation.

Authors:  P Randhawa
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Peritransplant kidney biopsies: comparison of pathologic interpretations and practice patterns of organ procurement organizations.

Authors:  Pooja Singh; John L Farber; Cataldo Doria; George C Francos; Rakesh Gulati; Carlo B Ramirez; Warren R Maley; Adam M Frank
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Improving the Supply and Quality of Deceased-Donor Organs for Transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan G Tullius; Hamid Rabb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Kidney.

Authors:  A Hart; J M Smith; M A Skeans; S K Gustafson; A R Wilk; S Castro; A Robinson; J L Wainright; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske; A K Israni
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Region-Based Convolutional Neural Nets for Localization of Glomeruli in Trichrome-Stained Whole Kidney Sections.

Authors:  John D Bukowy; Alex Dayton; Dustin Cloutier; Anna D Manis; Alexander Staruschenko; Julian H Lombard; Leah C Solberg Woods; Daniel A Beard; Allen W Cowley
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Characteristics and Performance of Unilateral Kidney Transplants from Deceased Donors.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Mariana C Chiles; Samnang Lee; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer; Bekir Tanriover; Lloyd E Ratner; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Relationship between donor renal interstitial surface and post-transplant function.

Authors:  D Serón; M Carrera; J M Griño; A M Castelao; M A Lopez-Costea; L Riera; J Alsina
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 9.  Translational AI and Deep Learning in Diagnostic Pathology.

Authors:  Ahmed Serag; Adrian Ion-Margineanu; Hammad Qureshi; Ryan McMillan; Marie-Judith Saint Martin; Jim Diamond; Paul O'Reilly; Peter Hamilton
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-01

10.  Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Clara I Sánchez; Nadya Timofeeva; Meyke Hermsen; Iris Nagtegaal; Iringo Kovacs; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Peter Bult; Bram van Ginneken; Jeroen van der Laak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  10 in total

1.  How Whole Slide Imaging and Machine Learning Can Partner with Renal Pathology.

Authors:  Parker C Wilson; Nidia Messias
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-02-11

2.  Evaluating tubulointerstitial compartments in renal biopsy specimens using a deep learning-based approach for classifying normal and abnormal tubules.

Authors:  Satoshi Hara; Emi Haneda; Masaki Kawakami; Kento Morita; Ryo Nishioka; Takeshi Zoshima; Mitsuhiro Kometani; Takashi Yoneda; Mitsuhiro Kawano; Shigehiro Karashima; Hidetaka Nambo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  The potential of artificial intelligence-based applications in kidney pathology.

Authors:  Roman D Büllow; Jon N Marsh; S Joshua Swamidass; Joseph P Gaut; Peter Boor
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Deep learning segmentation of glomeruli on kidney donor frozen sections.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Richard C Davis; Yuemei Xu; Zehan Wang; Nao Souma; Gina Sotolongo; Jonathan Bell; Matthew Ellis; David Howell; Xiling Shen; Kyle J Lafata; Laura Barisoni
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Procurement Biopsies in Kidney Transplantation: More Information May Not Lead to Better Decisions.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram Kasiske; David A Axelrod
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 14.978

6.  Scale-Aware Transformers for Diagnosing Melanocytic Lesions.

Authors:  Wenjun Wu; Sachin Mehta; Shima Nofallah; Stevan Knezevich; Caitlin J May; Oliver H Chang; Joann G Elmore; Linda G Shapiro
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  The Independent Effects of Procurement Biopsy Findings on 10-Year Outcomes of Extended Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants.

Authors:  Darren E Stewart; Julia Foutz; Layla Kamal; Samantha Weiss; Harrison S McGehee; Matthew Cooper; Gaurav Gupta
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-05-30

8.  A user-friendly tool for cloud-based whole slide image segmentation with examples from renal histopathology.

Authors:  Brendon Lutnick; David Manthey; Jan U Becker; Brandon Ginley; Katharina Moos; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Luis Rodrigues; Alexander J Gallan; Laura Barisoni; Charles E Alpers; Xiaoxin X Wang; Komuraiah Myakala; Bryce A Jones; Moshe Levi; Jeffrey B Kopp; Teruhiko Yoshida; Jarcy Zee; Seung Seok Han; Sanjay Jain; Avi Z Rosenberg; Kuang Yu Jen; Pinaki Sarder
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Renal Pathology: Advances and Prospects.

Authors:  Yiqin Wang; Qiong Wen; Luhua Jin; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 10.  Artificial intelligence applications for pre-implantation kidney biopsy pathology practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ilaria Girolami; Liron Pantanowitz; Stefano Marletta; Meyke Hermsen; Jeroen van der Laak; Enrico Munari; Lucrezia Furian; Fabio Vistoli; Gianluigi Zaza; Massimo Cardillo; Loreto Gesualdo; Giovanni Gambaro; Albino Eccher
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.393

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.