Literature DB >> 3495038

Painful pseudarthrosis following lumbar spinal fusion: detection by combined SPECT and planar bone scintigraphy.

W J Slizofski, B D Collier, T J Flatley, G F Carrera, R S Hellman, A T Isitman.   

Abstract

Twenty-six adult patients more than 6-months post-lumbar spinal fusion were studied. Flexion and extension radiographs showing motion or bone scintigrams showing focal areas of increased activity within the fusion mass were considered positive for pseudarthrosis. Patients were classified as either symptomatic or asymptomatic. Among the 15 symptomatic patients, scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.83 which was superior to the 0.43 sensitivity and 0.50 specificity of radiography. Six of the 11 asymptomatic patients had focal areas of increased activity in the bony fusion mass, possibly reflecting painless pseudarthrosis. Planar imaging was substantially enhanced by SPECT in 14 of the 26 cases. It is concluded that for the patient who remains symptomatic after lumbar spinal fusion, bone scintigraphy with SPECT is of significant value in detecting painful pseudarthrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3495038     DOI: 10.1007/BF00367762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The nature of pseudarthrosis.

Authors:  A F DePalma; R H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1968 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Failure of technetium bone scanning to detect pseudarthroses in spinal fusion for scoliosis.

Authors:  K M Hannon; W J Wetta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Lumbar spinal instability (olisthesis) after extensive posterior spinal decompression.

Authors:  C K Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The scintigraphic assessment of the scoliotic spine after fusion.

Authors:  M J McMaster; M V Merrick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1980-02

6.  A comparison of the long term results of three types of posterior fusion of the lumbar spine for spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Y Suezawa; F P Bernoski; H A Jacob
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A comparison of radiographic findings in fusion and nonfusion patients ten or more years following lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; E N Hanley; J Howe; D Kuhlmann; R E Matteri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease. A minimum ten-year followup.

Authors:  J W Frymoyer; E Hanley; J Howe; D Kuhlmann; R Matteri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. End-result study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J C Flynn; M A Hoque
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Closed loop instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T J Flatley; H Derderian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of single photon emission computed tomography in bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  I P Murray; J Dixon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Bone scan: a useful test for evaluating patients with low back pain.

Authors:  B D Collier; K M Kir; B J Mills; N C Patel; W T Pochis; C Onsel; Y Liu; H T Turoglu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The role of bone SPECT/CT in patients with persistent or recurrent lumbar pain following lumbar spine stabilization surgery.

Authors:  Khulood Al-Riyami; Stefan Vöö; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Ian Pressney; Adam Meir; Adrian Casey; Sean Molloy; James Allibone; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Assessment of successful incorporation of cages after cervical or lumbar intercorporal fusion with [(18)F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Dorothee R Fischer; K Zweifel; V Treyer; R Hesselmann; A Johayem; K D M Stumpe; G K von Schulthess; T F Hany; K Strobel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Tomoscintigraphy of the lumbar spine: prospects and clinical application.

Authors:  R Gunzburg; F Servais; M Verhas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Bone SPECT/CT in the postoperative spine: a focus on spinal fusion.

Authors:  Khulood Al-Riyami; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Spinal fusion-hardware construct: Basic concepts and imaging review.

Authors:  Mohamed Ragab Nouh
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-28

Review 9.  Scintigraphy of spinal disorders in adolescents.

Authors:  G A Mandell; H T Harcke
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Initial investigation of ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT for identification of vertebral sites amenable to surgical revision after spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Quon; Robert Dodd; Andrei Iagaru; Marcelo Rodrigues de Abreu; Sergio Hennemann; Jose Maria Alves Neto; Clarice Sprinz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.