| Literature DB >> 34949967 |
Huiling Liu1, Xiaona Yang2, Xinkun Wang1, Xiaoyu Yang3, Xusheng Zhang4, Qi Li5.
Abstract
In order to improve the efficiency of auxiliary medication for patients with mild cognitive impairment, this paper proposes a method based on VR technology and health education. Sixty elderly patients with COPD and MCI admitted to a hospital from January 2019 to February 2020 were randomly divided into a control group and study group, with 50 cases in each group. On the basis of conventional drug therapy, health education, and respiratory muscle training, patients in the control group received routine lung rehabilitation training, while patients in the study group received lung rehabilitation training using the BioMaster virtual scene interactive rehabilitation training system. Both groups continued training for 12 weeks. Lung function indexes, 6-minute walking distance, COPD assessment test (CAT) score, and Montreal Cognitive Function Assessment Scale (MoCA) score were compared between the 2 groups before training and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after training. The experimental results show that, in the study group, the percentage of FEV1 in the predicted value at 8 weeks after training, the percentage of FEV1 in the predicted value at 12 weeks after training, and FEV1/FVC were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in 6-minute walking distance, CAT score, and MoCA score between the two groups before training (P > 0.05). Twelve weeks after training, patients in the study group had a longer 6-minute walking distance, a lower CAT score, and a higher MoCA score than those in the control group (P < 0.05). It is proved that the application of virtual reality technology in lung rehabilitation training of elderly COPD patients with MCI is effective, which can effectively improve the lung function, cognitive function, and exercise tolerance of the patients and reduce the symptoms of dyspnea and the efficiency of medication.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34949967 PMCID: PMC8670913 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1187704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Comparison of pulmonary function indexes before training and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after training between the two groups.
| Group | Number of cases | The percentage of FEV1in the predicted value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before training. | Four weeks after training. | Eight weeks after training. | Twelve weeks after training. | ||
| Control group | 50 | 40.3 ± 10.7 | 45.8 ± 12.7 | 44.8 ± 5.9 | 51.7 ± 13.2 |
| Research group | 50 | 39.2 ± 8.6 | 44.0 ± 10.3 | 55.1 ± 8.3 | 57.7 ± 10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Figure 1Comparison of FEV1 between two groups before training and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after training.
Figure 2Comparison of walking distance, CAT score, and MoCA score between the two groups before and after training for 12 weeks and 6 minutes.
Comparison of ADL scores of patients before and after intervention.
| Group | Before intervention. | After 12 weeks of intervention, |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 28.5 | 22.13 | 0.026 |
| Research group | 28.17 | 25.9 | 0.125 |
| Compared with the control group after intervention, | |||