Ingrid S van Maurik1, Stephanie J Vos2, Isabelle Bos3, Femke H Bouwman4, Charlotte E Teunissen5, Philip Scheltens4, Frederik Barkhof6, Lutz Frolich7, Johannes Kornhuber8, Jens Wiltfang9, Wolfgang Maier10, Oliver Peters11, Eckart Rüther12, Flavio Nobili13, Giovanni B Frisoni14, Luiza Spiru15, Yvonne Freund-Levi16, Asa K Wallin17, Harald Hampel18, Hilkka Soininen19, Magda Tsolaki20, Frans Verhey2, Iwona Kłoszewska21, Patrizia Mecocci22, Bruno Vellas23, Simon Lovestone24, Samantha Galluzzi25, Sanna-Kaisa Herukka19, Isabel Santana26, Ines Baldeiras26, Alexandre de Mendonça27, Dina Silva28, Gael Chetelat29, Stephanie Egret29, Sebastian Palmqvist30, Oskar Hansson31, Pieter Jelle Visser3, Johannes Berkhof32, Wiesje M van der Flier33. 1. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: i.vanmaurik@amsterdamumc.nl. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands. 3. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands. 4. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 5. Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK. 7. Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medical Faculty Mannheim University of Heidelberg, Germany. 8. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 9. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Göttingen, Germany; iBiMED, Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. 10. Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Gerotopsychiatry, University of Bonn, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany. 11. Department of Psychiatry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany. 12. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. 13. Clinical Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Neurology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. 14. Memory Clinic, University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 15. Geriatrics, Gerontology and Old Age Psychiatry Clinical Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy-"Elias" Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania; Memory Clinic and Longevity Medicine, Ana Aslan International Foundation, Romania. 16. School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet Center for Alzheimer Research, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. 17. Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 18. Alzheimer Precision Medicine, GRC 21, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Eisai, Neurology Business Group, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA. 19. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 20. 1st Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Memory and Dementia Center, "AHEPA" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece. 21. Department of Geriatric Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. 22. Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 23. UMR INSERM 1027, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France. 24. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 25. Lab Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy. 26. Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 27. Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. 28. Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Centre for Biomedical Research, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal. 29. Université Normandie, Inserm, Université de Caen-Normandie, Inserm UMR-S U1237, GIP Cyceron, Caen, France. 30. Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. 31. Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. 32. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 33. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomarker-based risk predictions of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment are highly relevant for care planning and to select patients for treatment when disease-modifying drugs become available. We aimed to establish robust prediction models of disease progression in people at risk of dementia. METHODS: In this modelling study, we included people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from single-centre and multicentre cohorts in Europe and North America: the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer's Disease (EMIF-AD; n=883), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; n=829), Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC; n=666), and the Swedish BioFINDER study (n=233). Inclusion criteria were a baseline diagnosis of MCI, at least 6 months of follow-up, and availability of a baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and MRI or CSF biomarker assessment. The primary endpoint was clinical progression to any type of dementia. We evaluated performance of previously developed risk prediction models-a demographics model, a hippocampal volume model, and a CSF biomarkers model-by evaluating them across cohorts, incorporating different biomarker measurement methods, and determining prognostic performance with Harrell's C statistic. We then updated the models by re-estimating parameters with and without centre-specific effects and evaluated model calibration by comparing observed and expected survival. Finally, we constructed a model combining markers for amyloid deposition, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration (ATN), in accordance with the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association research framework. FINDINGS: We included all 2611 individuals with MCI in the four cohorts, 1007 (39%) of whom progressed to dementia. The validated demographics model (Harrell's C 0·62, 95% CI 0·59-0·65), validated hippocampal volume model (0·67, 0·62-0·72), and updated CSF biomarkers model (0·72, 0·68-0·74) had adequate prognostic performance across cohorts and were well calibrated. The newly constructed ATN model had the highest performance (0·74, 0·71-0·76). INTERPRETATION: We generated risk models that are robust across cohorts, which adds to their potential clinical applicability. The models could aid clinicians in the interpretation of CSF biomarker and hippocampal volume results in individuals with MCI, and help research and clinical settings to prepare for a future of precision medicine in Alzheimer's disease. Future research should focus on the clinical utility of the models, particularly if their use affects participants' understanding, emotional wellbeing, and behaviour. FUNDING: ZonMW-Memorabel.
BACKGROUND: Biomarker-based risk predictions of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment are highly relevant for care planning and to select patients for treatment when disease-modifying drugs become available. We aimed to establish robust prediction models of disease progression in people at risk of dementia. METHODS: In this modelling study, we included people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from single-centre and multicentre cohorts in Europe and North America: the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer's Disease (EMIF-AD; n=883), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; n=829), Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC; n=666), and the Swedish BioFINDER study (n=233). Inclusion criteria were a baseline diagnosis of MCI, at least 6 months of follow-up, and availability of a baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and MRI or CSF biomarker assessment. The primary endpoint was clinical progression to any type of dementia. We evaluated performance of previously developed risk prediction models-a demographics model, a hippocampal volume model, and a CSF biomarkers model-by evaluating them across cohorts, incorporating different biomarker measurement methods, and determining prognostic performance with Harrell's C statistic. We then updated the models by re-estimating parameters with and without centre-specific effects and evaluated model calibration by comparing observed and expected survival. Finally, we constructed a model combining markers for amyloid deposition, tauopathy, and neurodegeneration (ATN), in accordance with the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association research framework. FINDINGS: We included all 2611 individuals with MCI in the four cohorts, 1007 (39%) of whom progressed to dementia. The validated demographics model (Harrell's C 0·62, 95% CI 0·59-0·65), validated hippocampal volume model (0·67, 0·62-0·72), and updated CSF biomarkers model (0·72, 0·68-0·74) had adequate prognostic performance across cohorts and were well calibrated. The newly constructed ATN model had the highest performance (0·74, 0·71-0·76). INTERPRETATION: We generated risk models that are robust across cohorts, which adds to their potential clinical applicability. The models could aid clinicians in the interpretation of CSF biomarker and hippocampal volume results in individuals with MCI, and help research and clinical settings to prepare for a future of precision medicine in Alzheimer's disease. Future research should focus on the clinical utility of the models, particularly if their use affects participants' understanding, emotional wellbeing, and behaviour. FUNDING: ZonMW-Memorabel.
Authors: Silvia Ingala; Ingrid S van Maurik; Daniele Altomare; Raphael Wurm; Ellen Dicks; Ronald A van Schijndel; Marissa Zwan; Femke Bouwman; Niki Schoonenboom; Leo Boelaarts; Gerwin Roks; Rob van Marum; Barbera van Harten; Inge van Uden; Jules Claus; Viktor Wottschel; Hugo Vrenken; Mike P Wattjes; Wiesje M van der Flier; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael E Belloy; Valerio Napolioni; Summer S Han; Yann Le Guen; Michael D Greicius Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Philip Scheltens; Bart De Strooper; Miia Kivipelto; Henne Holstege; Gael Chételat; Charlotte E Teunissen; Jeffrey Cummings; Wiesje M van der Flier Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Leuzy; N J Ashton; N Mattsson-Carlgren; A Dodich; M Boccardi; J Corre; A Drzezga; A Nordberg; R Ossenkoppele; H Zetterberg; K Blennow; G B Frisoni; V Garibotto; O Hansson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Oskar Hansson; Nicholas C Cullen; Antoine Leuzy; Shorena Janelidze; Sebastian Palmqvist; Anna L Svenningsson; Erik Stomrud; Jeffrey L Dage Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Harriet A Ball; Laura McWhirter; Clive Ballard; Rohan Bhome; Daniel J Blackburn; Mark J Edwards; Stephen M Fleming; Nick C Fox; Robert Howard; Jonathan Huntley; Jeremy D Isaacs; Andrew J Larner; Timothy R Nicholson; Catherine M Pennington; Norman Poole; Gary Price; Jason P Price; Markus Reuber; Craig Ritchie; Martin N Rossor; Jonathan M Schott; Tiago Teodoro; Annalena Venneri; Jon Stone; Alan J Carson Journal: Brain Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Lucrezia Hausner; Lutz Frölich; Christine A F von Arnim; Jens Bohlken; Richard Dodel; Markus Otto; Michael Rapp; Jörg Schulz; Tilmann Supprian; M Axel Wollmer; Frank Jessen Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 1.214