Literature DB >> 34949593

Feasibility and Added Value of Fetal DTI Tractography in the Evaluation of an Isolated Short Corpus Callosum: Preliminary Results.

A-E Millischer1,2,3,4, D Grevent5,2,3, P Sonigo5,2,3, N Bahi-Buisson2,6, I Desguerre2,6, H Mahallati3,7, J-P Bault8, T Quibel8, S Couderc9, M-L Moutard10, E Julien11, V Dangouloff5,2, B Bessieres12, V Malan13, T Attie13, L-J Salomon14,3, N Boddaert5,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Prognosis of isolated short corpus callosum is challenging. Our aim was to assess whether fetal DTI tractography can distinguish callosal dysplasia from variants of normal callosal development in fetuses with an isolated short corpus callosum.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 37 cases referred for fetal DTI at 30.4 weeks (range, 25-34 weeks) because of an isolated short corpus callosum  less than the 5th percentile by sonography at 26 weeks (range, 22-31 weeks). Tractography quality, the presence of Probst bundles, dysmorphic frontal horns, callosal length (internal cranial occipitofrontal dimension/length of the corpus callosum ratio), and callosal thickness were assessed. Cytogenetic data and neurodevelopmental follow-up were systematically reviewed.
RESULTS: Thirty-three of 37 fetal DTIs distinguished the 2 groups: those with Probst bundles (Probst bundles+) in 13/33 cases (40%) and without Probst bundles (Probst bundles-) in 20/33 cases (60%). Internal cranial occipitofrontal dimension/length of the corpus callosum was significantly higher in Probst bundles+ than in Probst bundles-, with a threshold value determined at 3.75 for a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI, 77%-100%) and specificity of 85% (95% CI, 63%-100%). Callosal lipomas (4/4) were all in the Probst bundles- group. More genetic anomalies were found in the Probst bundles+ than in Probst bundles- group (23% versus 10%, P = .08).
CONCLUSIONS: Fetal DTI, combined with anatomic, cytogenetic, and clinical characteristics could suggest the possibility of classifying an isolated short corpus callosum as callosal dysplasia and a variant of normal callosal development.
© 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34949593      PMCID: PMC8757544          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

1.  Assessing prenatal white matter connectivity in commissural agenesis.

Authors:  Gregor Kasprian; Peter C Brugger; Veronika Schöpf; Christian Mitter; Michael Weber; Johannes A Hainfellner; Daniela Prayer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  An unusual association of corpus callosum agenesis in a patient with acromegaly.

Authors:  Sambit Das; Anil Bhansali; Pinaki Dutta; Niranjan Khandelwal; Vimal Upreti; R Santosh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-12-20

Review 3.  Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes.

Authors:  Timothy J Edwards; Elliott H Sherr; A James Barkovich; Linda J Richards
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Organising white matter in a brain without corpus callosum fibres.

Authors:  Audrey Bénézit; Lucie Hertz-Pannier; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Karla Monzalvo; David Germanaud; Delphine Duclap; Pamela Guevara; Jean-François Mangin; Cyril Poupon; Marie-Laure Moutard; Jessica Dubois
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 5.  Midline congenital malformations of the brain and skull.

Authors:  Sara Nuñez; Maria T Mantilla; Sonia Bermúdez
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Neurodevelopmental outcome following prenatal diagnosis of a short corpus callosum.

Authors:  Roni Meidan; Omer Bar-Yosef; Itay Ashkenazi; Orr Yahal; Michal Berkenstadt; Chen Hoffman; Abraham Tsur; Reuven Achiron; Eldad Katorza
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Fetal pericallosal lipomas - Clues to diagnosis in the second trimester.

Authors:  Shiri Shinar; Tally Lerman-Sagie; Monica Echevarria Telleria; Fernando Viñals; Raquel García; Hector Quiroga; Carmina Bermejo; Liat Ben-Sira; Zvika Leibovitz; Joseph Har-Toov; Gustavo Malinger
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).

Authors:  Erin Rooney Riggs; Erica F Andersen; Athena M Cherry; Sibel Kantarci; Hutton Kearney; Ankita Patel; Gordana Raca; Deborah I Ritter; Sarah T South; Erik C Thorland; Daniel Pineda-Alvarez; Swaroop Aradhya; Christa Lese Martin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Gerlinde M Gruber; Janina M Patsch; Rainer Seidl; Daniela Prayer; Gregor Kasprian
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

10.  Improved neurodevelopmental prognostication in isolated corpus callosal agenesis: fetal magnetic resonance imaging-based scoring system.

Authors:  M C Diogo; S Glatter; D Prayer; G M Gruber; D Bettelheim; M Weber; G Dovjak; R Seidl; G Kasprian
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 8.678

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.