| Literature DB >> 34948132 |
Jingyi Luo1,2,3, Pengbo Sun1,2,4, Xun Zhang1,2,3, Guanglan Lin1,2,4, Qilei Xin1,2,3, Yaoyun Niu1,2, Yang Chen1,2,3, Naihan Xu1,2,3,4, Yaou Zhang1,2,3,4, Weidong Xie1,2,3,4.
Abstract
The microenvironment plays a vital role in tumor progression, and hypoxia is a typical microenvironment feature in nearly all solid tumors. In this study, we focused on elucidating the effect of canagliflozin (CANA), a new class of antidiabetic agents, on hepatocarcinoma (HCC) tumorigenesis under hypoxia, and demonstrated that CANA could significantly inhibit hypoxia-induced metastasis, angiogenesis, and metabolic reprogramming in HCC. At the molecular level, this was accompanied by a reduction in VEGF expression level, as well as a reduction in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins and glycolysis-related proteins. Next, we focused our study particularly on the modulation of HIF-1α by CANA, which revealed that CANA decreased HIF-1α protein level by inhibiting its synthesis without affecting its proteasomal degradation. Furthermore, the AKT/mTOR pathway, which plays an important role in HIF-1α transcription and translation, was also inhibited by CANA. Thus, it can be concluded that CANA decreased metastasis, angiogenesis, and metabolic reprogramming in HCC by inhibiting HIF-1α protein accumulation, probably by targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway. Based on our results, we propose that CANA should be evaluated as a new treatment modality for liver cancer.Entities:
Keywords: HIF-1α; angiogenesis; canagliflozin; epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT); glycolysis; hypoxia; liver cancer; metastasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34948132 PMCID: PMC8704642 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413336
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1CANA inhibited hypoxia-induced metastasis. (A) Chemical structure of CANA. (B) Cytotoxic effects after chemical hypoxia (CoCl2 100 μM) and CANA (0–100 μM) intervention for 24 h were evaluated by MTT assay. Transwell (200X) (C) and wound healing assays (100X) (D) were performed to determine the migration of HepG2 cells. Data were shown as means ± S.D. (n = 3); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Control, normal untreated control; CANA, CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group.
Figure 2CANA inhibited hypoxia-induced epithelia-to-mesenchymal transition. (A) Effect of CANA on the protein expression of the epithelial marker in hypoxia-induced HepG2 cells after 24 h. (B) Effect of CANA on the protein expression of the mescenchymal marker in hypoxia-induced HepG2 cells after 24 h. (C) Effect of CANA on the protein expression of β-catenin and talin in hypoxia-induced HepG2 cells after 24 h. (D) Effects of CANA on reactive oxygen species (ROS) in hypoxia-induced HepG2 cells after 24 h (100×). Data were shown as means ± S.D. (n = 3); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Control, normal untreated control; CANA, CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group.
Figure 3CANA inhibited hypoxia-induced angiogenesis. HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM medium or CoCl2 100 μM and CANA (10 or 20 μM) for 24 h to obtain the condition medium. (A) Tube formation was performed with condition medium to determine the angiogenic ability of HUVECs (50X). (B) Tube-like structure formation on Matrigel in HepG2 cells (50X). Protein expression levels in (C) HUVEC cells with condition medium or in (D) HepG2 cells. (E) Immunohistochemical staining for the VEGFA protein in tumor specimens from xenografts (200X, 400X). Data were shown as means ± S.D. (n = 3); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Control, normal untreated control; CANA, CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group.
Figure 4CANA inhibited hypoxia-induced glycolysis. (A) Effect of CANA or/and chemical hypoxia on extracellular glucose levels, extracellular lactate levels and extracellular ATP levels in HepG2 cells. (B–E) Effect of CANA or/and chemical hypoxia on protein expression of glycolytic enzymes in HepG2 cells. Data were shown as means ± S.D. (n = 3); * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. Control, normal untreated control; CANA, CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group.
Figure 5CANA inhibited accumulation of HIF-1α. (A) Venn diagram of the common targets between liver cancer-related targets and CANA potential targets and bubble plot of the key regulators for overlapping genes. (B) Expression of HIF-1α protein in HepG2 cells exposed to CoCl2 in the presence or absence of CANA. (C) Expression of HIF-1α protein in HepG2 cells exposed to CoCl2 in the presence of LW-6, CANA, or both. (D) Representative tumor tissue sections showing expression of HIF-1α protein detected immunohistochemically in the indicated groups (200X, 400X). Data were shown as means ± S.D. (n = 3); *** p < 0.001. Control, normal untreated control; CANA, CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group; LW-6, LW-6-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group; LW-6 + CANA, LW-6-treated CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group.
Figure 6CANA triggered HIF-1α reduction through the AKT/mTOR pathway through inhibiting HIF-1α protein synthesis. (A) Effect of CANA or/and chemical hypoxia on mRNA expression of HIF-1α in HepG2 cells. (B) Schematic summary of HIF-1α hydroxylation and its proteasome-dependent degradation pathway. (C) HIF-1α protein expression in HepG2 cells treated with CANA or proteasome inhibitor MG132 under chemical hypoxia. (D) HIF-1α protein expression in HepG2 cells treated CHX and with/without CANA under chemical hypoxia. (E) WikiPathway enrichment analysis of the common targets. (F–H) Effect of CANA or/and chemical hypoxia on protein expression of AKT/mTOR pathway-related molecules in HepG2 cells. (I) HepG2 cells were treated with LY294002 or/and CANA under hypoxia followed by Western blots analysis of HIF-1α, AKT, and p-AKT. (J) HepG2 cells were treated with insulin or/and CANA followed by Western blots analysis of HIF-1α, AKT, and p-AKT. Data were shown as means ± S.D. (n = 3); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Control, normal untreated control; CANA, CANA-treated CoCl2 (100 μM)-induced group.