| Literature DB >> 34947007 |
Carmen Rodríguez-Cerdeira1,2,3,4,5, Erick Martínez-Herrera1,4,5,6,7, Gabriella Fabbrocini4,8, Beatriz Sanchez-Blanco1,3,4, Adriana López-Barcenas4,5,9, May El-Samahy4,10, Eder R Juárez-Durán1,5,9, José Luís González-Cespón1,3.
Abstract
The most important aetiological agent of opportunistic mycoses worldwide is Candida spp. These yeasts can cause severe infections in the host, which may be fatal. Isolates of Candida albicans occur with greater frequency and variable resistance patterns. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been recognised as an alternative treatment to kill pathogenic microorganisms. PDT utilises a photosensitizer, which is activated at a specific wavelength and oxygen concentration. Their reaction yields reactive oxygen species that kill the infectious microorganism. A systematic review of new applications of PDT in the management of candidiasis was performed. Of the 222 studies selected for in-depth screening, 84 were included in this study. All the studies reported the antifungal effectiveness, toxicity and dosimetry of treatment with antimicrobial PDT (aPDT) with different photosensitizers against Candida spp. The manuscripts that are discussed reveal the breadth of the new applications of aPDT against Candida spp., which are resistant to common antifungals. aPDT has superior performance compared to conventional antifungal therapies. With further studies, aPDT should prove valuable in daily clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Candida spp.; antimicrobial photodynamic therapy; genes; nanocarriers; photosensitizer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947007 PMCID: PMC8705304 DOI: 10.3390/jof7121025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Participating elements in photodynamic reactions: Type I reactions and singlet oxygen type II reactions require the presence of molecular oxygen, superoxide, and hydroxyl radicals. ROS can affect many types of organic molecules, including nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids.
Figure 2PRISMA flow diagram [10].
Characteristics of nanocarriers for drug delivery in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.
| Nanocarriers | Characteristics | References |
|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | Liposomes are spherical vesicles bounded by a membrane bilayer composed of phospholipids. The water-soluble and fat-soluble portions of the phospholipids enable the activated release of liposome contents. | Fan et al. [ |
| Dendrimers | A dendrimer is a polyvalent polymer with a three-dimensional tree-like structure. They allow the transport of therapeutic agents physically entrapped within the dendritic scaffold or attached to end groups. | Sherje et al. [ |
| Gold and silver nanoparticles | The nanoparticles consist of gold and silver particles with a typical size between 1 and 100 nm. Biodistribution and cellular absorption of the nanoparticles depend on their size and shape. | Yaqoob et al. [ |
| Metal oxide nanoparticles | These are essential components of catalysts in electrochemical energy conversion and storage devices, including fuel cells, metal–air batteries, and water element separation systems. | Zafar et al. [ |
| Mesoporous silica nanoparticles | These are a mesoporous form of silica. | Niculescu et al. [ |
| Chitosan | It is composed of fibres of marine origin, found naturally in the chitin of the shells of crustaceans. A linear polysaccharide is chemically composed of β-(1-4)-linked, deacetylated D-glucosamine and acetylated N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Its biocompatibility and biodegradability are good. Chitosan acts synergistically with antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. | Calixto et al. [ |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | They are particles of less than 1 µm in size (generally 10–500 nm). They are composed of different polymeric materials. They are stable in suspension and are readily biocompatible. As they are compounds foreign to our body, toxicity and immunogenicity can occur. | Zielińska et al. [ |
Examples of nanocarriers in combination with photosensitizers in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.
| Nanocarrier Type | Compound | Photosensitizer | Effectiveness | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | CTAB-liposomes constituted with various ratios of dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-phosphatidylcholine | Chlorine e6 |
| Improved | Yang et al. [ |
| Dendrymers | Amino acid-based dendrimers and tetra- and octapeptides attached to poly(L-lysine) (PLL) dendrimers | NA |
| Improved | Mlynarczyk et al. [ |
| PEGylated dendrimers | Silicon phthalocyanine Pc 4 is |
| Increased | Baron et al. [ | |
| Gold and silver nanoparticles | Monodispersed biogenic colloidal gold nanoparticles | Rose Bengal |
| Improved | Maliszewska et al. [ |
| Chitosan | Cationic chitosan/tripolyphosphate nanoparticles | Phthalocyanine |
| Improved | Hesieh et al. [ |
| Ethylcellulose/chitosan | 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(p-hydroxyphenyl)porphyrin (pTHPP) |
| Improved | Hasanin et al. [ | |
| Carboxymethyl chitosan | 1-[4-(2-aminoethyl) phenoxy] zinc (II) phthalocyanine (ZnPcN) |
| Increased | Tang et al. | |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Polymeric nanocapsules | Curcumin |
| Variable | Sakima et al. [ |
| Zinc phthalocyanine derivatives |
| Improved | Evangelista et al. [ |
CTAB = cationic surfactant, cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide. NA = not applicable or not available.
Overview of photosensitizer types and their characteristics.
| Photosensitizer Type | Compound | Characteristics Compound Absorption Peak λ (nm) Used | Dose Range/Con-centration % | Light Dose/Power (J/cm2)/mW Used | Toxicity | Outcome | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyanines | Phthalocyanine | Cyanine dye; | 0.14 mg/kg intravenously | 12.6–94.5 J/cm2 | Colonies | Minimal skin photosensitivity | To increase efficiency, nanocarriers are needed | Malisze-wska et al. [ |
| Indomethacin green | λ = 606 and 808 nm | 0.1 mL | 10 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Azizi et al. | ||
| Silicon phthalocyanine Pc 4 | λ = 670–675 | 5 µM of Pc4 encapsulated in PEGylated PAMAM nanoparticles | 10 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Hutnick et al. [ | ||
| Chlorins | Chlorin e6 | λ = 632 nm | 2 mL | 150 mW | Cells of | NA | Effective | Acosta et al. [ |
| Photoditazine® | λ = 660 nm | 200 mg/L | 50 J/cm2 | Tongues of mice with oral candidiasis: | NA | Efficacy of therapies evaluated by microbiological, macroscopic, histopathological and confocal scanning laser microscopy | Hidalgo et al. [ | |
| λ = 650–680 nm | 100 mg/L | 37.2 J/cm2 | Tongues of mice with oral candidiasis: | NA | Effective, but in vivo studies needed | Alves et al. | ||
| λ = 660 nm | 100 mg/L | 37.5 J/cm2 | Tongues of mice with oral candidiasis: | Safe | Effective | Carmello et al. [ | ||
| Porphyrins | Hematoporphyrin and porfimer sodium | Tetrapyrrole structure; | 0.5–5 mg/kg | 75–250 J/cm2 | Great photosensitivity for 6–10 | Effective | Sousa et al. [ | |
| (ALA | λ = 350–800 nm | 5 μM | 90 mW/cm2 | NA | Effective | Quiroga et al. [ | ||
| Tetrapyrrole structure | 10–60 mg/kg orally | 50–150 J/cm2 | Neurotoxicity | Effective | Cai et al. [ | |||
| MAL) | λ = 633 ± 10 nm | 100 µL of 0.5% hexyl-aminolevulinate and ethosomes | 60 mW/cm2, distance 10 cm | NA | Effective | Wang et al. [ | ||
| 5-Methyl-aminolevulinate | λ= 630 nm | 16–20% | 37 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Aspiroz et al. [ | ||
| Synthetic Dyes | Toluidine blue | λ = 635 nm | NA | 400 mW | NA | Variable, depends on yeast type | Keten et al. [ | |
| Toluidine ortho blue | λ = 630–660 nm | 0.1 μM | 50 J/cm2 | NA | Efficacy reaches 80% | Wiench et al. [ | ||
| Toluidine blue | λ = 405–650 nm | 20 μg/mL | 10 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Merigo et al. [ | ||
| λ = 635 nm | 44 μM | 175.2 J/cm2, | NA | Variable | Garcia et al. [ | |||
| Methylene blue | λ = 635 nm | 0.0003 to 0.06 molar | 6- 18 J/cm2 | NA | Variable | Boltes Cecatto et al. [ | ||
| λ = 664 nm | 25–500 μg/mL | 275 J/cm2 and 400 mW during 687.5 s | NA | Effective | Teichert et al. [ | |||
| λ = 660 nm | 0.01–0.001 mg/mL | 76.8 J/cm2 | NA | Partially | Hosseini et al. [ | |||
| Methylene blue and glucose | ʎ = 660 nm at a radiant power of 473 mW and 50 mM glucose | 0 mM glucose | 10, 30 and 60 J/cm2 | Cells and biofilm | NA | Partial effect | Oliveira-Silva et al. | |
| Methylene blue and | λ = 660 nm | 10 µL | 10–15 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Figueiredo-Godoi et al. [ | ||
| Rose Bengal | Rose Bengal excited by green light at λ = 450–600 nm | Cultures 10 µmol/L; biofilms 40 µmol/L | 36 J/cm2 | Planktonic cultures and biofilms of | NA | Reduction in number of hyphae | Costa et al. [ | |
| Crystal violet | N-tetra-penta-hexametil p-rosanilinas; λ =660 nm | 1 g/10 mL | 76.8 J/cm2, | NA | Effective | Hosseine et al. [ | ||
| Malachite green | 400–700 nm | 50–500 µM | 1.9 ± 0.1 mW/cm2 for 30 min | Planktonic cultures of | NA | Effective | Valkov et al. [ | |
| Malachite green | λ = 660 nm | 0.1 mL | 26 J/cm | Microbial suspensions containing 106 cells/mL | NA | Low cost, highly efficient, and short application time | Junqueira et al. [ | |
| Natural dyes | Hyperecin | λ = 570 nm | 0.62 μmol/L | 18–37 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Paz-Cristobal et al. [ | |
| Hipocrellin A and B | Peak at λ = 600–900 nm; λ = 470 nm | 1 mg/mL to 10 μM | 72 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Yang et al. [ | ||
| Riboflavin | Λ = 360 and 440 nm | 0,1% | blue LED light (light dose) | Culture of | NA | Effective | Alshehri et al. [ | |
| Chlorophyll | Pheophorbide A | Tetrapyrrole structure | 5 μM | 50 mW/cm2 for 10 min | NA | Effective | Dong et al. [ | |
| Others | Aloe-emodin (1,8-dihydrox 3-(hydroxymethyl)-9,10-anthracenedione) | λ = 400–780 nm | 0.1–100 μM | 4.8 J/cm2 | NA | Effective | Ma et al. [ |
PS = photosensitizer; ALA = 5-aminolevulinic acid; MAL = 5-methyl aminolevulinate; s = second; min = minute; g = gram; mg = milligram; μM = micromole; λ = wavelength; nm = nanometres; J/cm2 = Joules per square centimetre; NA = not applicable or not available.
Characteristics of C. albicans genes related to virulence and involved in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.
| Photosensitizer | Genes | Results | Origin | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylene blue | SAP5, LIP9 and PLB2 | 60% SAP5/50% LIP9 and PLB2 | Biofilms | Freire et al. [ | |
| Methylene blue | ALS3, HWP1, BCR1, TEC1, CPH1 y EFG1 | ALS3, HWP1, BCR1, TEC1, CPH1 y EFG1 | Strains | Freire et al. [ | |
| Photodithazine (PDZ | ALS1, HWP1, CAP1, CAT1, SOD1 | ALS1, HWP1, CAP1, CAT1, | Biofilms | Jordão et al. [ | |
| Photodithazine® (PDZ) | ALS1, HWP1, EFG1, CAT1, CAP1, SOD1, SAP1, PLB1 and LIP3 | Special decrease in SOD1 | Colonies from tongues of mice | Jordão et al. [ | |
| Photodithazine® (PDZ) plus | ALS1, HWP1, EFG1, CAP1, CAT1, SOD1, SAP1, PLB1 y LIP3 | PLB1 y ACT1 | Dental patient samples | Alonso et al. [ |