| Literature DB >> 34946806 |
Lulu Wang1, Gang Zheng1, Yiming Yuan1, Ziyi Wang1, Changjun Liu2, Hao Zhang1, Ling Lian1.
Abstract
Marek's disease (MD) was an immunosuppression disease induced by Marek's disease virus (MDV). MD caused huge economic loss to the global poultry industry, but it also provided an ideal model for studying diseases induced by the oncogenic virus. Alternative splicing (AS) simultaneously produced different isoform transcripts, which are involved in various diseases and individual development. To investigate AS events in MD, RNA-Seq was performed in tumorous spleens (TS), spleens from the survivors (SS) without any lesion after MDV infection, and non-infected chicken spleens (NS). In this study, 32,703 and 25,217 AS events were identified in TS and SS groups with NS group as the control group, and 1198, 1204, and 348 differently expressed (DE) AS events (p-value < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05) were identified in TS vs. NS, TS vs. SS, SS vs. NS, respectively. Additionally, Function enrichment analysis showed that ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, p53 signaling pathway, and phosphatidylinositol signaling system were significantly enriched (p-value < 0.05). Small structural variations including SNP and indel were analyzed based on RNA-Seq data, and it showed that the TS group possessed more variants on the splice site region than those in SS and NS groups, which might cause more AS events in the TS group. Combined with previous circRNA data, we found that 287 genes could produce both circular and linear RNAs, which suggested these genes were more active in MD lymphoma transformation. This study has expanded the understanding of the MDV infection process and provided new insights for further analysis of resistance/susceptibility mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: RNA-Seq; alternative splice; marek’s disease; regulatory network
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946806 PMCID: PMC8701255 DOI: 10.3390/genes12121857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1(A) The number of AS events in each group. (B) The number of corresponded genes of total AS evens in each group.
Figure 2PCR amplification was performed TS, NS, and SS with primers designed for both sides of the skipped exons. The black arrow represents the product of amplification from the original transcript, and the red arrow represents the product of amplification after exon skipping. Sanger sequencing showed the sequence after exon skipping.
Inclusion junction counts (IJC) and skipping junction counts (SJC) of AS events in TS, NS, and SS.
| Gene_Name | IJC_TS | SJC_TS | IJC_NS | SJC_NS | IJC_SS | SJC_SS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1730, 701, 912, 599, 833, 980, 1362 | 55, 43, 83, 19, 16, 28, 22 | 1379, 1025, 940, 1399, 1600 | 23, 9, 8, 17, 14 | 10, 229, 697, 271, 717, 700 | 14, 11, 68, 22, 6 |
|
| 0, 58, 79, 22, 26, 15, 8 | 126, 272, 326, 146, 102, 57, 128 | 4, 1, 7, 0, 11 | 127, 129, 113, 204, 140 | 17, 11, 8, 20, 14 | 172, 182, 148, 184, 156 |
|
| 658, 398, 738, 318, 133, 188, 482 | 20, 4, 4, 13, 18, 14, 36 | 327, 271, 220, 366, 296 | 43, 53, 60, 39, 33 | 220, 228, 289, 371, 427 | 29, 24, 28, 42, 34 |
|
| 45, 130, 38, 33, 53, 63, 66, 29 | 6, 47, 24, 3, 4, 6, 1 | 4, 7, 3, 5, 5 | 3, 0, 1, 1, 1 | 11, 13, 4, 7, 1 | 5, 0, 0, 2, 0 |
Note: The number that was separated by commas represented the counts in different samples were detected within the group.
Figure 3(A) The number of SNP and indel in TS, NS, SS groups. (B) Annotations of SNP on the genome. (C) Annotations of SNP on splice site acceptor, splice site donor, and splice site region. (D) Annotations of indel on the genome. (E) Annotations of indel on splice site acceptor, splice site donor, and splice site region.
Figure 4(A) Total DE AS events in TS_vs_NS, TS_vs_SS, SS_vs_NS. (B). Statistics on the number of alternative splicing events produced by parental genes. MYCBP2 possessed 13 predicted DE AS events, and MSH4 harbored 16 predicted DE AS events. (C). DE AS events corresponding genes in TS_vs_NS, TS_vs_SS, SS_vs_NS. (D) Venn diagram of DE AS events.
Figure 5(A,B) Significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathway analysis of DE AS corresponded genes TS_vs_NS. (C,D) Significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathway analysis of DE AS corresponded genes TS_vs_SS. (E,F) Significantly enriched GO terms and KEGG pathway analysis of DE AS corresponded genes SS_vs_NS.
Figure 6(A) A total of 287 overlapped genes in DE AS corresponded genes and circRNA parental genes. (B) The proportion of exon and intron circRNAs of 501 circRNAs generated from 287 overlapped genes. (C) Number of circRNAs that generated from these 287 genes. (D) PPI network of 287 genes. Top 5 nodes were identified by the MCC method in the cytohubba model in Cytoscape. (E) DE SE event of TRIP12 in TS vs. NS and TS vs. SS.