| Literature DB >> 34946115 |
Ilavenil Soundharrajan1, Yong Hee Yoon2, Karnan Muthusamy1, Jeong-Sung Jung1, Hyun Jeong Lee3, Ouk-Kyu Han4, Ki Choon Choi1.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging condition that increases the risk of spreading and prolonging infectious diseases globally. Therefore, a new alternative strategy for antibiotics is required urgently to control pathogens spreading. Probiotics are considered as an alternative for antibiotics that inhibit pathogens. In the present study, potent lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated and screened for their probiotic characteristics and antagonistic activity against intestinal pathogens by agar well diffusion, Time and Dose-dependent killing assay, minimum inhibitor, and minimum bactericidal concentration (MIC/MBC), and co-culture methods. The Lactococcus lactis RWP-3 and RWP-7 fermented the different carbohydrate substrates and produced different extracellular enzymes. Both isolates showed significant tolerant capability in the gastric, duodenal, and intestinal juices. In addition, RWP-3 and RWP-7 had hydrophobicity and aggregation properties in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, the cell-free secondary metabolites (CFS) of RWP-3 and RWP-7 showed strong antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli,Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis. A co-culture study revealed that the RWP-3 and RWP-7 strongly compete with pathogen growths. RWP-3 and RWP-7 showed strong antagonistic activities against tested pathogens with significant probiotic characteristics, suggesting that these strains obtained could be used as an alternative strategy for the antibiotic to control infectious pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: CFS; Lactococcus lactis; antagonistic activities; infectious diseases; probiotics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946115 PMCID: PMC8703902 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9122513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Probiotic characteristics of isolated strains RWP-3 and RWP-7. (A) Survival of isolates in GIT conditions, (B) Hydrophobicity, (C) Auto-aggregation property of isolates. Data were represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. a,b,c p < 0.05 alphabets between bars represent significance between the pathogens.
Antibacterial activity by well diffusion method.
| Species Name | Zone of Inhibitions (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| RWP-3 | 23.6 ± 1.2 b | 28.60 ± 2.8 a | 17.8 ± 0.56 c | 18.3 ± 0.49 c |
| RWP-7 | 42.0 ± 1.4 a | 22.05 ± 2.1 b | 15.6 ± 0.28 c | 18.5 ± 1.06 c |
mm: millimeter. Data were represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. a,b,c p < 0.05 alphabets within rows represent significance between the pathogens.
Figure 2(A) Assay of pathogenic bacterial growth inhibition in response to CFS of RWP3 treatment by time and dose-dependent killing method. (B) Assay of pathogenic bacterial growth inhibition in response to CFS of RWP7 treatment by time and dose-dependent killing method. (a) E. coli vs. CFS, (b) E. faecalis vs. CFS, (c) P. aeruginosa vs. CFS, (d) S. aureus vs. CFS. Data were represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Minimum Inhibitory concentration and Minimum bactericidal Concentration (MIC/MBC) of CFS of RWP-3 and RWP-7.
| Pathogens | CFS of RWP3 | CFS of RWP7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | |
|
| 12.5 | - | 25 | 12.5 |
|
| 6.25 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 25 |
|
| 12.5 | 25 | 6.25 | 12.5 |
|
| 12.5 | 25 | 12.5 | 25 |
Growth competition study between L. lactis strains and pathogens by co-culture method.
| Groups | Growth on MRS Agar | Growth on NA | Groups | Growth on MRS Agar | Growth on NA | Groups | Growth on NA (Mono) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| 4.28 ± 0.22 # | RWP7 alone | 6.08 ± 0.45 # | ||||
|
| 3.93 ± 0.15 # | 0.236 ± 0.03 c | RWP7 ± SA | 5.84 ± 1.20 # | 0.70 ± 0.03 b | SA alone | 28.0 ± 0.56 a |
|
| 5.16 ± 0.65 # | 0.548 ± 0.06b | RWP7 ± PA | 6.08 ± 0.11 # | 0.50 ± 0.07 b | PA alone | 28.4 ± 1.98 a |
|
| 1.51 ± 0.14 * | 0.124 ± 0.02 c | RWP7 ± EC | 1.36 ± 0.14 * | 0.03 ± 0.01 b | EC alone | 29.5 ± 2.80 a |
|
| 5.06 ± 0.14 # | 0.212 ± 0.01 c | RWP7 ± EF | 2.97 ± 0.04 # | 0.27 ± 0.03 c | EF alone | 23.4 ± 0.07 a |
|
| |||||||
|
| 5.85 ± 0.11 # | RWP7 alone | 7.81 ± 0.30 # | ||||
|
| 1.21 ± 0.08 * | 0.236 ± 0.03 d | RWP7 ± SA | 1.12 ± 0.06 * | 0.74 ± 0.03 c | SA alone | 54.0 ± 6.29 a |
|
| 1.26 ± 0.32 * | 0.822 ± 0.09b | RWP7 ± PA | 0.92 ± 0.29 * | 0.95 ± 0.28 b | PA alone | 47.3 ± 1.81 a |
|
| 5.50 ± 0.07 # | 0.036 ± 0.00 e | RWP7 ± EC | 1.30 ± 0.21 * | 0.17 ± 0.00 d | EC alone | 35.6 ± 2.26 a |
|
| 1.40 ± 0.14 * | 0.680 ± 0.00 c | RWP7 ± EF | 1.50 ± 0.78 * | 0.17 ± 0.00 d | EF alone | 38.7 ± 3.40 a |
|
| |||||||
|
| 7.64 ± 0.53 # | RWP7 alone | 8.28 ± 0.48 # | ||||
|
| 1.68 ± 0.17 * | 0.108 ± 0.01d | RWP7 ± SA | 1.64 ± 0.48 * | 0.192 ± 0.01 c | SA alone | 48.8 ± 2.95 a |
|
| 7.44 ± 0.05 # | 0.216 ± 0.01 c | RWP7 ± PA | 8.14 ± 0.14# | 0.156 ± 0.03 c | PA alone | 33.8 ± 2.07 a |
|
| 2.80 ± 0.21 * | 0.846 ± 0.29 b | RWP7 ± EC | 2.71 ± 0.15 * | 0.590 ± 0.07 b | EC alone | 37.7 ± 2.76 a |
|
| 3.20 ± 0.28 * | 0.16 ± 0.022 d | RWP7 ± EF | 7.35 ± 0.81# | 0.148 ± 0.14 c | EF alone | 38.5 ± 5.03 a |
Co-Culture: LAB co-cultured with pathogens; Monoculture: LAB and pathogens were cultured separately. Both mono (alone) and co-cultures were grown in MRS: NA broth (1:1 ratio) and incubated at 37 °C with mild shaking. At 12, 24 and 36 h, then tenfold serial dilution as made with sterile distilled water. A hundred microliter of diluted sample was spread onto MRS and NA agar plates for LAB and pathogen growth and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The bacterial colonies were counted in both MRS and NA agar plates and the data were compared with respective monocultures. The data were represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *, < 0.05 indicates significant between LAB of mono and co-cultures. a,b,c,d,e p < 0.05 alphabets within a columns represent significant between pathogens of mono and co-culture.