| Literature DB >> 34945608 |
Xin Xu1,2, Chengtuo Niu1,2, Chunfeng Liu1,2, Jinjing Wang1,2, Feiyun Zheng1,2, Qi Li1,2.
Abstract
Flavor stability is important for beer quality and extensive efforts have been undertaken to improve this. In our previous work, we proved a concept whereby metabolic engineering lager yeast with increased cellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydride (NADH) availability could enhance the flavor stability of beer. However, the method for breeding non-genetically modified strains with higher NADH levels remains unsolved. In the current study, we reported a novel approach to develop such strains based on atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) mutagenesis coupled with 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) selection. As a result, we obtained a serial of strains with higher NADH levels as well as improved flavor stability. For screening an optimal strain with industrial application potential, we examined the other fermentation characteristics of the mutants and ultimately obtained the optimal strain, YDR-63. The overall fermentation performance of the strain YDR-63 in pilot-scale fermentation was similar to that of the parental strain YJ-002, but the acetaldehyde production was decreased by 53.7% and the resistance staling value of beer was improved by 99.8%. The forced beer aging assay further demonstrated that the favor stability was indeed improved as the contents of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in YDR-63 was less than that in YJ-002 and the sensory notes of staling was weaker in YDR-63. We also employed this novel approach to another industrial strain, M14, and succeeded in improving its flavor stability. All the findings demonstrated the efficiency and versatility of this new approach in developing strains with improved flavor stability for the beer industry.Entities:
Keywords: ARTP; DNP; beer; flavor stability; lager yeast
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945608 PMCID: PMC8701400 DOI: 10.3390/foods10123057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1The death rate of YJ-002 at different times of ARTP treatment.
Figure 2Heatmap for the NADH/NAD+ ratios of the mutants selected from the DNP plate. The NADH/NAD+ ratio of YJ-002 was 0.180. The strains with an increased NADH level are marked in red, and those with a decreased value are marked in green.
Figure 3Screening an optimal strain with improved flavor stability. (a) Schematic representation of the entire selection. (b) Heat map for the TAB value of the mutants; strains with reduced TBA value than YJ-002 are marked in pink, strains with increased TBA value are marked in blue, strains with reduced NADH levels are marked in grey, and the TBA values have not been detected. (c) The reduction rates of the TBA value in those strains with decreased TBA value (126 of 142) were calculated to reflect the improvement in the flavor stability. (d) Fermentation stability is an important criterion for the industrial producing strain; therefore, five runs of fermentation were carried out and the fluctuations in acetaldehyde production were compared to judge this characteristic.
Figure 4Fermentation performance of the optimal strain YDR-63 and parental strain YJ-002. (a) Cell amounts; (b) apparent extract; (c) diacetyl content; (d) ethanol production. Three samples were collected at each time point, and the data are shown as mean ± SD.
Parameters after the fermentation in CCTs with 14 °P wort (mean ± SD, n = 3, * p < 0.05).
| YJ-002 | YDR63 | M14 | MDR17 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real attenuation (%) | 68.73 ± 0.12 | 69.29 ± 0.08 * | 65.49 ± 0.19 | 65.04 ± 0.05 * |
| Diacetyl (mg/L) | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| Ethanol (%) | 6.21 ± 0.16 | 6.31 ± 0.09 | 5.56 ± 0.15 | 5.52 ± 0.03 |
| Acetaldehyde (mg/L) | 10.56 ± 0.04 | 4.89 ± 0.03 * | 14.16 ± 0.03 | 5.14 ± 0.05 * |
| Ethyl acetate (mg/L) | 18.42 ± 0.11 | 17.33 ± 0.17 * | 13.24 ± 0.08 | 13.17 ± 0.05 |
| Isoamyl acetate (mg/L) | 1.27 ± 0.03 | 1.59 ± 0.05 * | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.33 ± 0.05 |
| 13.82 ± 0.21 | 12.78 ± 0.23 * | 8.23 ± 0.25 | 8.57 ± 0.18 | |
| Isoamyl alcohol (mg/L) | 54.55 ± 0.23 | 50.35 ± 0.20 * | 40.62 ± 0.26 | 41.91 ± 0.37 * |
| Isobutanol (mg/L) | 9.17 ± 0.18 | 6.98 ± 0.13 * | 6.43 ± 0.05 | 6.71 ± 0.08 * |
| RSV | 50.23 | 100.37 * | 61.55 | 133.24 * |
Figure 5(a) Sensory analysis of the beer produced by the strain YDR-63 and strain YJ-002. (b) Detecting the levels of 5-HMF in beer samples to reflect the beer aging degree. Samples collected at the end of storage were marked with the tail E while the samples with forced aging treatment were marked with the tail F.