| Literature DB >> 34945462 |
Sonia Tammar1,2, Nidhal Salem3, Wissem Aidi Wannes1, Hajer Limam1,4, Soumaya Bourgou1, Nedia Fares3, Sarra Dakhlaoui1, Majdi Hammami1, Saber Khammassi1, Giovanni Del Re5, Kamel Hessini6, Kamel Msaada1.
Abstract
This research aimed to study the chemical composition of Aloysia citrodora methanolic extract and its biological activities as an antioxidant, and its antibacterial, antifungal and anti-inflammatory activities based on four bioclimatic collection stages. The contents of total phenols, total flavonoids and total tannins were determined. Nine phenolic compounds were identified by LC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS. The major compound was acteoside, a phenylpropanoid which represented about 80% of the methanolic fraction in the various regions. The antioxidant activities of different locations were measured by different analytical assays, such as DPPH, ABTS and iron reducing power. The results showed that phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities varied with climatic and environmental factors. Moreover, there was a significant dependency between regions and biological activities. The use of a principal component analysis showed that there was a close relationship among phenylpropanoids, phenolic compounds and the studied biological activities.Entities:
Keywords: Aloysia citrodora; anti-inflammatory activity; antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; antioxidant activity; environmental factors; phenolic compounds; verbascoside
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945462 PMCID: PMC8700817 DOI: 10.3390/foods10122912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Studied area data of Tunisian lemon verbena.
| Bioclimatic Zone | Longitude | Latitude | Elevation | Mean Rainfall | Soil | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kairouan | Upper Arid | 10°05′46″ E | 36°27′21″ N | 122 | 287 | Sandy |
| Gabes | Middle Arid | 10°05′53″ E | 33°52′53″ N | 299 | 223 | Sandy |
| Boussalem | Interior Sub-Humid | 8°46′48″ E | 36°30′04″ N | 143 | 537 | Clay |
| Belli | Upper Semi-Arid | 10°44′15″ E | 36°27′21″ N | 14 | 326 | Clay |
Retention time (Rt), spectral data and tentative identification of methanolic lemon verbena extract.
| Peak | Rt (min) | λmax | [M-H]− | Production | Tentative Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.17 | 326 | 335 | 179 | Caffeoylshikimic acid |
| 2 | 14.08 | 273 | 305 | 289 | Catechin-gallate |
| 3 | 16.02 | 326 | 515 | 353 | 3,4-Di-caffeoylquinic acid |
| 4 | 16.7 | 326 | 515 | 353 | 3,5-di-caffeoylquinic acid |
| 5 | 24.26 | 249, 289, 331 | 623 | 461 | Acteoside |
| 6 | 25.46 | 249, 289, 331 | 623 | 461 | Isoacteoside |
| 7 | 27.83 | 281, 325 | 651 | 475 | Martynoside |
| 8 | 39.44 | 337 | 299 | - | Diosmetin |
| 9 | 40.72 | 339 | 269 | - | Apigenin |
Variation in the chemical composition of methanolic lemon verbena extracts depending on the collection area.
| Peak Area (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolic Compound | Belli | Gabes | Boussalem | Kairouan |
| |
| 1 | Caffeoylshikimic acid | 0.64 c ± 0.03 | 0.85 b ± 0.04 | 0.95 a ± 0.05 | 0.53 d ± 0.03 | 0.001 *** |
| 2 | Catechin-gallate | 0.88 b ± 0.04 | 0.86 b ± 0.04 | 0.96 ab ± 0.05 | 1.01 a ± 0.05 | 0.034 * |
| 3 | 3,4-di-caffeoylquinic acid | 4.81 a ± 0.24 | 1.05 b ± 0.05 | 4.85 a ± 0.24 | 0.86 b ± 0.04 | 0.001 *** |
| 4 | 3,5-di-caffeoylquinic acid | 1.28 b ± 0.06 | 0.86 c ± 0.04 | 1.55 a ± 0.08 | 0.67 c ± 0.03 | 0.001 *** |
| 5 | Acteoside | 76.07 b ± 3.8 | 76.15 b ± 3.81 | 83.54 a ± 4.18 | 81.94 a ± 4.1 | 0.001 *** |
| 6 | Isoacteoside | 4.35 ab ± 0.22 | 4.19 b ± 0.21 | 4.70 a ± 0.24 | 4.55 a ± 0.23 | 0.021 * |
| 7 | Martynoside | 5.32 bc ± 0.27 | 5.85 b ± 0.3 | 5.59 b ± 0.28 | 8.18 a ± 0.41 | 0.001 *** |
| 8 | Diosmetin | 4.58 a ± 0.23 | 4.04 ab ± 0.2 | 3.21 c ± 0.16 | 3.83 b ± 0.19 | 0.01 ** |
| 9 | Apigenin | 1.66 b ± 0.08 | 2.35 a ± 0.12 | 1.05 bc ± 0.05 | 1.44 b ± 0.07 | 0.001 *** |
| Total flavonoids | 27.53 b ± 1.03 | 37.20 a ± 1.36 | 39.86 a ± 0.64 | 38.86 a ± 0.49 | 0.000 *** | |
| Total Polyphenols | 12.75 c ± 0.13 | 11.66 c± 0.12 | 29.16 a ± 0.30 | 25.50 b ± 0.26 | 0.000 *** | |
| Tannins | 0.03 ab ± 0.01 | 0.02 c ± 0.01 | 0.04 a ± 0.01 | 0.04 a ± 0.01 | 0.002 ** | |
The values shown in this table are the mean of three replicates and are given as the mean ± SD (n = 3). One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test were used. The values with different exponents (a–d) were significantly different at p < 0.05. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1Chemical composition chromatographic profile of methanolic lemon verbena extracts depending on the location of collection by LC-DAD. The affiliation of the numbered peaks is reported in Table 3.
Figure 2Relative positions of lemon verbena collection regions according to their phenolic composition using a hierarchical ascending classification (HAC).
Antioxidant properties against DPPH and ABTS radicals and the reducing power (RP) of methanolic lemon verbena extract.
| Collecting Regions | Synthetic Standard |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belli | Boussalem | Gabes | Kairouan | BHT | Ascorbic Acid | ||
| DPPH | 14.52 b ± 1.01 | 12.71 d ± 0.24 | 14.90 a ± 0.83 | 13.13 c ± 0.91 | 17 ± 0.41 | - | 0.001 *** |
| ABTS | 7.62 ab ± 1.05 | 4.54 c ± 1.13 | 8.10 a ± 1.12 | 5.61 c ± 0.92 | 16 ± 1.18 | - | 0.001 *** |
| RP | 15.24 b ± 1.06 | 10.37 b ± 1.33 | 16.02 a ± 1.15 | 11.24 c ± 1.07 | - | 4 ± 0.12 | 0.001 *** |
IC50 values represent the mean of three replicates (n = 3); the letters (a–d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. *** Significant at p < 0.001%.
In vitro antimicrobial activities of methanolic lemon verbena extracts collected in four localities.
| Regions | Antibiotic | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belli | Gabes | Boussalem | Kairouan | Gentamicine |
| ||
| Gram + | |||||||
|
| IZ | 13 a ± 2 | 10.33 bc ± 1 | 11 b ± 1 | 10.33 bc ± 2 | 22 ± 2 | 0.001 *** |
| MIC | 0.25 ± 0.20 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | |||||
|
| IZ | 26 b ± 1 | 25 bc ± 2 | 23 c ± 2 | 32.5 a ± 2 | 39 ± 3 | 0.001 *** |
| MIC | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | |||||
|
| IZ | 12 b ± 1 | 15 a ± 2 | 16 a ± 2 | 16.33 a ± 1 | 15 ± 1.85 | 0.04 * |
| MIC | 1 ± 0.23 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | |||||
| Gram − | |||||||
|
| IZ | 11 a ± 1 | 9.5 a ± 1 | 10 a ± 1 | 10.33 a ± 1 | 29 ± 2 | 0.52 NS |
| MIC | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.42 | |||||
|
| IZ | 9 c ± 1 | 11.33 b ± 1 | 14 a ± 1 | 11.5 b ± 1 | 19 ± 2.21 | 0.001 *** |
| MIC | 1.2 ± 0.38 | 0.86 ± 2.21 | |||||
|
| IZ | 15.5 ab ± 2 | 17.33 a ± 1 | 11 c ± 1 | 13 b ± 1 | 27.01 ± 2.7 | 0.001 *** |
| MIC | 1.33 ± 0.15 | 0.85 ± 0.76 | |||||
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration (µg/mL), IZ: inhibition zone (mm). Values are given as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and are the average of three replicates. One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test were used. Values with different superscripts (a–c) are significantly different at p < 0.05. Values followed by a common letter in columns are not significant (p > 0.05). NS: not significant. * significant at p < 0.1, *** significant at p < 0.001.
Figure 3Variation in the percentages of inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, Candida albicans and Nystatin depending on the location of collection. The values are the average of three replicates.
Figure 4Evolution of cell viability as a function of the concentrations of lemon verbena extracts in different collection regions. Percentages with different letters (a,A,b,B) were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 5Variation of anti-inflammatory activity of the methanolic lemon verbena extracts depending on the location of collection.
Figure 6Principal component analysis in a biplot of the lemon verbena populations according to the composition of methanolic extracts, their activities and climatic conditions. TP: total polyphenols, TF: total flavonoids, NO: anti-inflammatory, DPPH, ABTS: antifree radical activity, RP: reducing power.